A randomized, double blind, single dose, comparative study of the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of MB02 (bevacizumab biosimilar) and reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers

Angela Sinn, Fernanda García-Alvarado, Veronica Gonzalez, Camino Huerga, Felicitas Bullo, Angela Sinn, Fernanda García-Alvarado, Veronica Gonzalez, Camino Huerga, Felicitas Bullo

Abstract

Aims: The pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between MB02, a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, and reference bevacizumab approved from the USA (US-bevacizumab) and European Union (EU-bevacizumab) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed.

Methods: In this phase 1, randomized, double blind, single dose, parallel group study, 114 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a 3 mg/kg intravenous dose of MB02, US-bevacizumab or EU-bevacizumab, and evaluated for 100 days. PK similarity between MB02 and reference bevacizumab was determined using the standard bioequivalence criteria (0.80-1.25) for the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞) ) and the maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ).

Results: Baseline demographics were similar across treatment groups. All study drugs exhibited similar PK profile. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric lead square means ratios for the primary parameters AUC(0-∞) and Cmax for MB02, US-bevacizumab and EU-bevacizumab were fully contained within the pre-defined bioequivalence limits for the 3 pairwise comparisons: AUC(0-∞) (MB02:US-bevacizumab 0.998 [0.944 to 1.05]; MB02:EU-bevacizumab 1.07 [1.00 to 1.14]; and US-bevacizumab:EU-bevacizumab 0.934 [0.884 to 0.988]) and Cmax (MB02:US-bevacizumab 0.983 [0.897 to 1.08]; MB02:EU-bevacizumab 1.06 [0.976 to 1.16]; and; US-bevacizumab: EU-bevacizumab 0.926 [0.851 to 1.01]). Treatment emergent adverse events were reported in 87 subjects (76.3%), most being mild and with comparable incidence among treatment groups. Thirty-three subjects (28.9%) reported 56 possibly related treatment emergent adverse events with comparable incidence across treatments, the most frequent being headache (10.5%) and fatigue (3.5%). Anti-drug antibody incidence was low and similar between treatment groups.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the PK similarity and bioequivalence of MB02 to the reference bevacizumab, whether approved from USA or EU. The safety and immunogenicity profile of MB02 was shown also to be similar to the bevacizumab reference product (NCT04238663).

Keywords: MB02; bevacizumab; biosimilars; pharmacokinetics; safety.

Conflict of interest statement

A. Sinn from Parexel International GmbH declares no potential financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. F. García‐Alvarado, V. Gonzalez, C. Huerga and F. Bullo are employees of mAbxience Research S.L.

© 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design. US = US licensed; EU = European approved; EOS = end of study; EOI = end of infusion; PK= pharmacokinetic; n = number of subjects in the analysis population
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Study participant flow (Pharmacokinetic population). US = US licensed; EU = European approved; PK= pharmacokinetic, n = number of subjects in the analysis population. Percentages are based on the number of subjects (n) in the randomized population
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Arithmetic mean serum concentration profiles of bevacizumab (across all days) (pharmacokinetic population). Mean serum concentrations versus nominal times on linear (A) and semilogarithmic scale (B) of MB02, EU‐bevacizumab, and US‐bevacizumab (across all days). US = US licensed, EU = European approved, IV = intravenous
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Relationship between drug AUC0‐inf and immunogenicity (pharmacokinetic population. (A) MB02: Geometric mean AUC(0‐∞) (h ∗ ng/mL) values. Overall = 30 700 000, non‐ADA positive = 31 000 000, ADA positive = 32 800 000, no‐neutralizing ADA positive = 32 800 000. (B) US‐bevacizumab: geometric mean AUC(0‐∞) (h ∗ ng/mL) values overall = 30 700 000, non‐ADA positive = 30 700 000, ADA positive = 31 700 000, no‐neutralizing ADA positive = 30 500 000. (C) EU‐bevacizumab: geometric mean AUC(0‐∞) (h ∗ ng/mL) values. Overall = 28 800 000, non‐ADA positive = 28 800 000, ADA positive = 28 000 000, no‐neutralizing ADA positive = 288 000 000

References

    1. Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J. 1999;13(1):9‐22.
    1. Takahashi S. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptors and their inhibitors for antiangiogenic tumor therapy. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(12):1785‐1788.
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA) Guideline on similar biological medicinal product (Rev 1). . Accessed December 6, 2020.
    1. United States Federal Drug Administration (US FDA) Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. . Accessed December 6, 2020.
    1. Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Torode J, Saar M, Eniu A. ESMO International Consortium Study on the availability, out‐of‐pocket costs and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines in countries outside of Europe. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2633‐2647.
    1. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335‐2342.
    1. Kabbinavar FF, Ellis LM. Can inhibition of angiogenic pathways increase the efficacy of intravenous 5‐fluorouracil‐based regimens? Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2004;4(Suppl 2):S69‐S73.
    1. Hochster HS, Hart LL, Ramanathan RK, et al. Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first‐line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3523‐3529.
    1. Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz‐Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy as first‐line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013‐2019.
    1. Alexander SP, Kelly E, Marrion NV, et al. The concise guide to pharmacology 2017/18: Overview. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(Suppl 1):S1‐S16.
    1. Alexander SP, Kelly E, Marrion NV, et al. The concise guide to pharmacology 2015/16: Overview. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172(24):5729‐5743.
    1. Keene ON. The log transformation is special. Stat Med. 1995;14(8):811‐819.
    1. Knight B, Rassam D, Liao S, Ewesuedo R. A phase I pharmacokinetics study comparing PF‐06439535 (a potential biosimilar) with bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(4):839‐846.
    1. Genentech Inc . Avastin® (bevacizumab) prescribing information; 2016. . Accessed December 17, 2020.
    1. Lu JF, Bruno R, Eppler S, Novotny W, Lum B, Gaudreault J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62(5):779‐786.
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Avastín: EPAR‐Product information. Annex I‐ Summary of product characteristics. . Accessed December 17, 2020.
    1. Hettema W, Wynne C, Lang B, et al. A randomized, single‐blind, Phase I trial (INVICTAN‐1) assessing the bioequivalence and safety of BI 695502, a bevacizumab biosimilar candidate, in healthy subjects. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26(8):889‐896.
    1. Tajima N, Martinez A, Kobayashi F, He L, Dewland P. A phase 1 study comparing the proposed biosimilar BS‐503a with bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2017;5(2):e00286.
    1. Garcia J, Hurwitz HI, Sandler AB, et al. Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in cancer treatment: A review of 15 years of clinical experience and future outlook. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;86:102017.
    1. Trukhin D, Poddubskaya E, Andric Z, et al. Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB02 (Bevacizumab Biosimilar) versus Reference Bevacizumab in Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Phase III Study (STELLA). BioDrugs. 2021;35(4):429‐444. 10.1007/s40259-021-00483-w
    1. Alymsys (bevacizumab) Summary of product characteristics . Accessed May 05, 2021.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다