Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in rabbits with acute lung injury

Jennifer Beck, Lukas Brander, Arthur S Slutsky, Maureen C Reilly, Michael S Dunn, Christer Sinderby, Jennifer Beck, Lukas Brander, Arthur S Slutsky, Maureen C Reilly, Michael S Dunn, Christer Sinderby

Abstract

Objective: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi)--a pneumatically-independent signal--to control the timing and pressure of the ventilation delivered, and should not be affected by leaks. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether NAVA can deliver assist in synchrony and proportionally to EAdi after extubation, with a leaky non-invasive interface.

Design and setting: Prospective, controlled experimental study in an animal laboratory.

Animals: Ten rabbits, anesthetized, mechanically ventilated.

Interventions: Following lung injury, the following was performed in sequential order: (1) NAVA delivered via oral endotracheal tube with PEEP; (2) same as (1) without PEEP; (3) non-invasive NAVA at unchanged NAVA level and no PEEP via a single nasal prong; (4) no assist; (5) non-invasive NAVA at progressively increasing NAVA levels.

Measurements and results: EAdi, esophageal pressure, blood gases and hemodynamics were measured during each condition. For the same NAVA level, the mean delivered pressure above PEEP increased from 3.9 +/ 1.4 cmH2O (intubated) to 7.5 +/- 3.8 cmH2O (non-invasive) (p<0.05) because of increased EAdi. No changes were observed in PaO2 and PaCO2. Increasing the NAVA level fourfold during non-invasive NAVA restored EAdi and esophageal pressure swings to pre-extubation levels. Triggering (106 +/- 20 ms) and cycling-off delays (40 +/- 21 ms) during intubation were minimal and not worsened by the leak (95 +/- 13 ms and 33 +/- 9 ms, respectively).

Conclusion: NAVA can be effective in delivering non-invasive ventilation even when the interface with the patient is excessively leaky, and can unload the respiratory muscles while maintaining synchrony with the subject's demand.

References

    1. Acta Paediatr. 2000 Dec;89(12):1420-5
    1. Pediatr Res. 1998 Feb;43(2):191-7
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):21-30
    1. Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):638-41
    1. J Pediatr. 1979 Mar;94(3):439-43
    1. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):662-7
    1. Pediatr Res. 2007 Mar;61(3):289-94
    1. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1998 Nov-Dec;110(6):482-8
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jun;102(6):2149-57
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;163(5):1135-42
    1. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Jan;87(1):82-7
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul 1;164(1):36-42
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1515-22
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Apr;31(4):574-80
    1. JAMA. 2003 Apr 23-30;289(16):2104-12
    1. Pediatrics. 1985 Sep;76(3):406-10
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1966 Mar;21(2):527-33
    1. Pediatr Res. 2006 May;59(5):705-10
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 1;164(3):419-24
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jul;27(7):1147-57
    1. Pediatr Res. 2004 May;55(5):747-54
    1. Lancet. 1984 Jan 7;1(8367):1-3
    1. Lab Anim. 2001 Jul;35(3):249-52
    1. Early Hum Dev. 1991 May;25(2):69-73
    1. Nat Med. 1999 Dec;5(12):1433-6
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 1990 Jun;149(9):648-50
    1. Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):2997-3004
    1. Biol Neonate. 2000;78(2):139-44
    1. J Pediatr Surg. 1979 Dec;14(6):761-7
    1. J Pediatr. 1983 Nov;103(5):769-73

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다