Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT in Patients With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Prospective Study

Guozhu Hou, Yuwei Zhang, Yu Liu, Peipei Wang, Weibo Xia, Xiaoping Xing, Li Huo, Fang Li, Hongli Jing, Guozhu Hou, Yuwei Zhang, Yu Liu, Peipei Wang, Weibo Xia, Xiaoping Xing, Li Huo, Fang Li, Hongli Jing

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT for detecting the responsible tumor of tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) and investigate if 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT can identify the culprit tumor of TIO in multiple suspicious lesions in 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT.

Methods: A total of 19 patients with suspected TIO were prospectively recruited in this study. Each patient underwent whole-body PET/CT scan 40-60 min postinjection using 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 on the same PET/CT, respectively in sequence, and on consecutive days. The diagnosis of TIO was confirmed by the combination of the postsurgical pathological results of the tumor and clinical information.

Results: Among the 19 patients with TIO who were included in this study, culprit tumors from all patients were confirmed pathologically. 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT positively identified the causative tumor in 18/19 patients, whereas 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT was positive in 11/19 patients (94.7% vs. 57.9%, respectively; p < 0.05). 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT demonstrated more than one increased focal activity in 7 patients for a total of 16 lesions (3 lesions each in 2 patients and 2 lesions each in the rest 5 patients). However, seven of these 16 lesions showed concordant results on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT by demonstrating increased activity (one lesion in each of the 7 patients). The surgical specimens of the lesions in these 7 patients confirmed the phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor. A total of 11 culprit tumors were positive in both 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT. The SUVmax of 11 culprit tumors was significantly higher on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT compared with that on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT (17.8 ± 12.5 vs. 6.8 ± 6.2; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is more sensitive to 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT in the detection of the culprit tumor of TIO. However, 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT might be helpful to identify the tumor in multiple suspicious lesions in 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT.

Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04689893.

Keywords: 68Ga-DOTA-JR11; 68Ga-DOTA-TATE; TIO; causative tumor; multiple.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Hou, Zhang, Liu, Wang, Xia, Xing, Huo, Li and Jing.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT comparing with 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT in Patient #7. The causative tumors of TIO were found in the left femoral head in patient #7 (A) on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT, but negative on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT (B). The lesion of the left femoral head was confirmed as the causative tumor of TIO by postsurgical pathological results.
Figure 2
Figure 2
68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT compared with 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT in Patient #6 with multiple suspected lesions. Two intensive uptake lesions in the left femoral head and left pubic bone revealed on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (A), which suggested that they might be the culprit tumors. The lesion of the left femoral head showed osteogenic change. However, the lesion in the left pubic bone only showed slightly increased uptake and the focus in the left femoral head still showed high uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT (B). The lesion of the left femoral head was confirmed as the responsible tumor of TIO by postsurgical pathological results.

References

    1. Minisola S, Peacock M, Fukumoto S, Cipriani C, Pepe J, Tella SH, et al. . Tumour-Induced Osteomalacia. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2017) 3:17044. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.44
    1. Florenzano P, Hartley IR, Jimenez M, Roszko K, Gafni RI, Collins MT. Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. Calcif Tissue Int (2021) 108(1):128–42. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00691-6
    1. Rayamajhi SJ, Yeh R, Wong T, Dumeer S, Mittal BR, Remotti F, et al. . Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia - Current Imaging Modalities and a Systematic Approach for Tumor Localization. Clin Imag (2019) 56:114–23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.04.007
    1. Seufert J, Ebert K, Müller J, Eulert J, Hendrich C, Werner E, et al. . Octreotide Therapy for Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. N Engl J Med (2001) 345(26):1883–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010839
    1. Clifton-Bligh RJ, Hofman MS, Duncan E, Sim IW, Darnell D, Clarkson A, et al. . Improving Diagnosis of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia With Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2013) 98(2):687–94. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3642
    1. Breer S, Brunkhorst T, Beil FT, Peldschus K, Heiland M, Klutmann S, et al. . Ga-68 DOTA-TATE PET/CT Allows Tumor Localization in Patients With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia But Negative In-111-Octreotide SPECT/CT. Bone (2014) 64:222–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.016
    1. Jadhav S, Kasaliwal R, Lele V, Rangarajan V, Chandra P, Shah H, et al. . Functional Imaging in Primary Tumour-Induced Osteomalacia: Relative Performance of FDG PET/CT vs Somatostatin Receptor-Based Functional Scans: A Series of Nine Patients. Clin Endocrinol (2014) 81(1):31–7. doi: 10.1111/cen.12426
    1. Zhang J, Zhu Z, Zhong D, Dang Y, Xing H, Du Y, et al. . 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT is an Accurate Imaging Modality in the Detection of Culprit Tumors Causing Osteomalacia. Clin Nucl Med (2015) 40(8):642–6. doi: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000000854
    1. Agrawal K, Bhadada S, Mittal BR, Shukla J, Sood A, Bhattacharya A, et al. . Comparison of F-18-FDG and Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT in Localization of Tumor Causing Oncogenic Osteomalacia. Clin Nucl Med (2015) 40(1):E6–E10. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000460
    1. El-Maouche D, Sadowski SM, Papadakis GZ, Guthrie L, Cottle-Delisle C, Merkel R, et al. . Ga-68-DOTATATE for Tumor Localization in Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. J Of Clin Endocrinol Metab (2016) 101(10):3575–81. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2052
    1. Satyaraddi A, Cherian KE, Shetty S, Kapoor N, Jebasingh FK, Cherian VM, et al. . Musculoskeletal Oncogenic Osteomalacia-An Experience From a Single Centre in South India. J Orthop (2017) 14(1):184–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.12.010
    1. Pal R, Bhadada SK, Singhare A, Bhansali A, Kamalanathan S, Chadha M, et al. . Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: Experience From Three Tertiary Care Centers in India. Endocrine Connections (2019) 8(3):266–76. doi: 10.1530/ec-18-0552
    1. Ding J, Hu G, Wang L, Li F, Huo L. Increased Activity Due to Fractures Does Not Significantly Affect the Accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in the Detection of Culprit Tumor in the Evaluation of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. Clin Nucl Med (2018) 43(12):880–6. doi: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002290
    1. Paquet M, Gauthe M, Yin JZ, Nataf V, Belissant O, Orcel P, et al. . Diagnostic Performance and Impact on Patient Management of Ga-68-DOTA-TOC PET/CT for Detecting Osteomalacia-Associated Tumours. Eur J Of Nucl Med Mol Imag (2018) 45(10):1710–20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3971-x
    1. Singh D, Chopra A, Ravina M, Kongara S, Bhatia E, Kumar N, et al. . Oncogenic Osteomalacia: Role of Ga-68 DOTANOC PET/CT Scan in Identifying the Culprit Lesion and its Management. Br J Radiol (2017) 90(1072):20160811. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160811
    1. Bhavani N, Asirvatham AR, Kallur K, Menon AS, Pavithran PV, Nair V, et al. . Utility of Gallium-68 DOTANOC PET/CT in the Localization of Tumour-Induced Osteomalacia. Clin Endocrinol (2016) 84(1):134–40. doi: 10.1111/cen.12822
    1. Meyer M, Nicod Lalonde M. Detection Rate of Culprit Tumors Causing Osteomalacia Using Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) (2019) 10(1):2. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10010002
    1. Fani M, Nicolas GP, Wild D. Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists for Imaging and Therapy. J Nucl Med (2017) 58(Suppl 2):61s–6s. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186783
    1. Fani M, Braun F, Waser B, Beetschen K, Cescato R, Erchegyi J, et al. . Unexpected Sensitivity of Sst2 Antagonists to N-Terminal Radiometal Modifications. J Nucl Med (2012) 53(9):1481–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.102764
    1. Zhu W, Cheng Y, Wang X, Yao S, Bai C, Zhao H, et al. . Head-To-Head Comparison of (68)Ga-DOTA-JR11 and (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic, Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study. J Nucl Med (2020) 61(6):897–903. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235093
    1. Jiang Y, Hou G, Cheng W. Performance of 68Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT, Octreoscan SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Culprit Tumors Causing Osteomalacia: A Meta-Analysis. Nucl Med Commun (2020) 41(4):370–6. doi: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001163
    1. Reubi JC, Waser B, Cescato R, Gloor B, Stettler C, Christ E. Internalized Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 in Neuroendocrine Tumors of Octreotide-Treated Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2010) 95(5):2343–50. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2487

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다