The negative impact of spasticity on the health-related quality of life of stroke survivors: a longitudinal cohort study

Patrick J Gillard, Heidi Sucharew, Dawn Kleindorfer, Samir Belagaje, Sepideh Varon, Kathleen Alwell, Charles J Moomaw, Daniel Woo, Pooja Khatri, Matthew L Flaherty, Opeolu Adeoye, Simona Ferioli, Brett Kissela, Patrick J Gillard, Heidi Sucharew, Dawn Kleindorfer, Samir Belagaje, Sepideh Varon, Kathleen Alwell, Charles J Moomaw, Daniel Woo, Pooja Khatri, Matthew L Flaherty, Opeolu Adeoye, Simona Ferioli, Brett Kissela

Abstract

Background: Spasticity often leads to symptomatic and functional problems that can cause disability for stroke survivors. We studied whether spasticity has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: As part of the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study (NCT00642213), 460 ischemic stroke patients were interviewed during hospitalization and then followed over time. HRQoL was measured by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores of the Short Form-12 (SF-12), EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D), and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SSQOL) instruments, with lower scores indicating worse health. HRQoL differences between stroke survivors with and without spasticity were compared, adjusting for age, race, stroke severity, pre-stroke function, and comorbidities.

Results: Of the 460 ischemic stroke patients, 328 had spasticity data available 3 months after their stroke (mean age of 66 years, 49% were female, and 26% were black). Of these patients, 54 (16%) reported having spasticity. Three months following their stroke, patients who reported spasticity had lower mean scores on the PCS (29.6 ± 1.4 vs 37.3 ± 0.6; P < .001), EQ-5D (0.59 ± 0.03 vs 0.71 ± 0.01; P < .001), and SSQOL (3.57 ± 0.08 versus 3.78 ± 0.03; P = .03) compared with patients who did not report spasticity. Lower HRQoL scores were also observed at the 1-year (PCS, EQ-5D, and SSQOL) and 2-year (EQ-5D and SSQOL) interviews in those with spasticity compared with those without spasticity.

Conclusions: Statistically and clinically meaningful differences in HRQoL exist between stroke survivors with and without spasticity.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adjusted mean Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores, by patient-reported spasticity presence. Significantly lower mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were reported by survivors with spasticity than those without spasticity at 3 months (mean PCS difference, −7.7; 95 % confidence interval [CI] –10.7 to −4.6; P < .001 and mean MCS difference 0.8; 95 % CI, −2.2 to 3.8; P = .59) and at 1 year (mean PCS difference −6.9; 95 % CI −10.3 to −3.6; P < .001 and mean MCS difference 0.1; 95 % CI −3.3 to 3.5; P = .96) poststroke. The SF-12 was not administered at the 2-year interview. Scores were adjusted for age, race, stroke severity using the retrospective National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, prestroke function using the modified Rankin Scale, and comorbidities
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adjusted mean EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) scores by patient-reported spasticity presence. Significantly lower EQ-5D scores were reported by survivors with spasticity than those without spasticity at 3 months (mean difference −0.12; 95 % confidence interval [CI] –0.18 to −0.06; P < .001), at 1 year (mean difference −0.12; 95 % CI −0.19 to −0.06; P < .001), and at 2 years (mean difference −0.08; 95 % CI −0.16 to −0.0004; P = .049) poststroke. Scores were adjusted for age, race, stroke severity using the retrospective National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, prestroke function using the modified Rankin Scale, and comorbidities
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adjusted mean Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SSQOL) scores by patient-reported spasticity presence. Significantly lower SSQOL scores were reported by survivors with spasticity than those without spasticity at 3 months (mean difference −0.20; 95 % CI −0.38 to −0.02; P = .03), at 1 year (mean difference −0.51; 95 % CI −0.70 to −0.32; P < .001), and at 2 years (mean difference −0.30; 95 % CI −0.52 to −0.09; P = .01) poststroke. Scores were adjusted for age, race, stroke severity using the retrospective National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, prestroke function using the modified Rankin Scale, and comorbidities

References

    1. Mackay J, Mensah G. The atlas of heart disease and stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad.
    1. Opheim A, Danielsson A, Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Upper-limb spasticity during the first year after stroke: stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:884–896. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000157.
    1. Urban PP, Wolf T, Uebele M, Marx JJ, Vogt T, Stoeter P, Bauermann T, Weibrich C, Vucurevic GD, Schneider A, Wissel J. Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:2016–2020. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581991.
    1. Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:814–820. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f13a3.
    1. Thompson AJ, Jarrett L, Lockley L, Marsden J, Stevenson VL. Clinical management of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:459–463. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.035972.
    1. Esquenazi A. The human and economic burden of poststroke spasticity and muscle overactivity. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2011;18:607–614.
    1. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, Miller R, Khoury J, Pancioli A, Gebel J, Mills D, Minneci L, Shukla R. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998;29:415–421. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.2.415.
    1. Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2000;31:858–862. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.4.858.
    1. Kissela B, Lindsell CJ, Kleindorfer D, Alwell K, Moomaw CJ, Woo D, Flaherty ML, Air E, Broderick J, Tsevat J. Clinical prediction of functional outcome after ischemic stroke: the surprising importance of periventricular white matter disease and race. Stroke. 2009;40:530–536. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521906.
    1. Calculating the U.S. Population-based EQ-5D™ Index Score. []. Accessed 17 Sept 2015.
    1. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43:203–220. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.
    1. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997;28:1876–1882. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.10.1876.
    1. Office of Public Health Assessment, Center for Health Data . Health Status in Utah: The Medical Outcomes Study SF-12 (2001 Utah Health Status Survey Report) Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health; 2004.
    1. Williams LS, Redmon G, Saul DC, Weinberger M. Reliability and telephone validity of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale. Stroke. 2000;32:339-b.
    1. Williams LS, Stump T, McHorney CA. Development of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale: item and domain reduction. Stroke. 2003;34:236. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000104160.96489.18.
    1. Post MW, Boosman H, van Zandvoort MM, Passier PE, Rinkel GJ, Visser-Meily JM. Development and validation of a short version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:283–286. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.196394.
    1. Hofer SM, Hoffman L. Statistical analysis with incomplete data: a developmental perspective. In: Little TD, Bovaird JA, Card NA, editors. Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies. Mahwah: LEA; 2007. pp. 13–32.
    1. Abubakar SA, Isezuo SA. Health related quality of life of stroke survivors: experience of a stroke unit. Int J Biomed Sci. 2012;8:183–187.
    1. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1523–1532. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0.
    1. Le QA, Doctor JN, Zoellner LA, Feeny NC. Minimal clinically important differences for the EQ-5D and QWB-SA in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): results from a Doubly Randomized Preference Trial (DRPT) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:59. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-59.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다