Effect of combination therapy with fenofibrate and simvastatin on postprandial lipemia in the ACCORD lipid trial

Gissette Reyes-Soffer, Colleen I Ngai, Laura Lovato, Wahida Karmally, Rajasekhar Ramakrishnan, Stephen Holleran, Henry N Ginsberg, Gissette Reyes-Soffer, Colleen I Ngai, Laura Lovato, Wahida Karmally, Rajasekhar Ramakrishnan, Stephen Holleran, Henry N Ginsberg

Abstract

Objective: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes lipid study (ACCORD Lipid), which compared the effects of simvastatin plus fenofibrate (FENO-S) versus simvastatin plus placebo (PL-S) on cardiovascular disease outcomes, measured only fasting triglyceride (TG) levels. We examined the effects of FENO-S on postprandial (PP) lipid and lipoprotein levels in a subgroup of ACCORD Lipid subjects.

Research design and methods: We studied 139 subjects (mean age of 61 years, 40% female, and 76% Hispanic or black) in ACCORD Lipid, from a total 529 ACCORD Lipid subjects in the Northeast Clinical Network. PP plasma TG, apolipoprotein (apo)B48, and apoCIII were measured over 10 h after an oral fat load.

Results: The PP TG incremental area under the curve (IAUC) above fasting (median and interquartile range [mg/dL/h]) was 572 (352-907) in the FENO-S group versus 770 (429-1,420) in the PL-S group (P = 0.008). The PP apoB48 IAUC (mean ± SD [μg/mL/h]) was also reduced in the FENO-S versus the PL-S group (23.2 ± 16.3 vs. 35.2 ± 28.6; P = 0.008). Fasting TG levels on the day of study were correlated with PP TG IAUC (r = 0.73 for FENO-S and r = 0.62 for PL-S; each P < 0.001). However, the fibrate effect on PP TG IAUC was a constant percentage across the entire range of fasting TG levels, whereas PP apoB48 IAUC was only reduced when fasting TG levels were increased.

Conclusions: FENO-S lowered PP TG similarly in all participants compared with PL-S. However, levels of atherogenic apoB48 particles were reduced only in individuals with increased fasting levels of TG. These results may have implications for interpretation of the overall ACCORD Lipid trial, which suggested benefit from FENO-S only in dyslipidemic individuals.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000620.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Postprandial incremental excursions for plasma TG, apoB48, and apoCIII. After fasting 12 h, participants had 0-h blood samples taken and then ingested a high-fat beverage containing 1,237 kcal/2 m2 body surface area from 75% fat (40% saturated, 20% monounsaturated, 15% polyunsaturated), 10% protein, and 15% carbohydrate. Sequential blood samples were obtained at 3, 5, 7, and 10 h after ingestion of the beverage. IAUC was calculated as described in research design and methods. The FENO-S group had a 30% reduction in plasma TG IAUC (A) and a 34% reduction in plasma apoB48 (B) compared with the PL-S group (statistical significance reported without adjustments). The IAUC for plasma apoCIII (C) was not different between the two groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationships between fasting plasma TG and the postprandial incremental excursions of plasma TG and apoB48. The fenofibrate effect on (log-transformed) IAUCs was analyzed by multiple regression with fenofibrate, sex, (log-transformed) day of study fasting TG, and fenofibrate × TG interaction as independent variables. For TG IAUC, the effect of fenofibrate was similar across the full range of day of study fasting TG (the solid and dashed regression lines are parallel) (A). The r value for the correlation between fasting TG and TG IAUC was 0.61 (P < 0.0001) for each group. In contrast, there was a significant interaction between day of study fasting TG levels and the effect of fenofibrate on the IAUC for apoB48 (the solid and dashed regression lines are not parallel) (B), whereby only participants with TG levels at and above the median had significant reductions in apoB48 IAUC (P = 0.003 for interaction; Table 2). Fasting TG and apoB48 IAUC were significantly correlated in the PL-S (r = 0.49; P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant relationship between fasting TG and apoB48 IAUC in the FENO-S group (r = 0.20; P = 0.11).

References

    1. Chahil TJ, Ginsberg HN. Diabetic dyslipidemia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2006;35:491–510, vii–viii
    1. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care 1993;16:434–444
    1. Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk 1996;3:213–219
    1. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation 2007;115:450–458
    1. Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P, et al. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009;302:1993–2000
    1. Bansal S, Buring JE, Rifai N, Mora S, Sacks FM, Ridker PM. Fasting compared with nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women. JAMA 2007;298:309–316
    1. Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. JAMA 2007;298:299–308
    1. Enkhmaa B, Ozturk Z, Anuurad E, Berglund L. Postprandial lipoproteins and cardiovascular disease risk in diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep 2010;10:61–69
    1. Carstensen M, Thomsen C, Gotzsche O, Holst JJ, Schrezenmeir J, Hermansen K. Differential postprandial lipoprotein responses in type 2 diabetic men with and without clinical evidence of a former myocardial infarction. Rev Diabet Stud 2004;1:175–184
    1. Reyes-Soffer G, Holleran S, Karmally W, et al. Measures of postprandial lipoproteins are not associated with coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Lipid Res 2009;50:1901–1909
    1. Goldfine AB, Kaul S, Hiatt WR. Fibrates in the treatment of dyslipidemias—time for a reassessment. N Engl J Med 2011;365:481–484
    1. Jun M, Foote C, Lv J, et al. Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:1875–1884
    1. Roth EM, McKenney JM, Kelly MT, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid combination therapy versus simvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2010;10:175–186
    1. Athyros VG, Papageorgiou AA, Athyrou VV, Demitriadis DS, Kontopoulos AG. Atorvastatin and micronized fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes with combined hyperlipidemia. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1198–1202
    1. Derosa G, Maffioli P, Salvadeo SA, et al. Fenofibrate, simvastatin and their combination in the management of dyslipidaemia in type 2 diabetic patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:1973–1983
    1. Goldberg AC, Bittner V, Pepine CJ, et al. Efficacy of fenofibric acid plus statins on multiple lipid parameters and its safety in women with mixed dyslipidemia. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:898–905
    1. Grundy SM, Vega GL, Yuan Z, Battisti WP, Brady WE, Palmisano J. Effectiveness and tolerability of simvastatin plus fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia (the SAFARI trial). Am J Cardiol 2005;95:462–468
    1. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, et al. ACCORD Study Group Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1563–1574
    1. Ginsberg HN, Bonds DE, Lovato LC, et al. ACCORD Study Group Evolution of the lipid trial protocol of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Am J Cardiol 2007;99(12A):56i–67i
    1. Ginsberg HN, Jones J, Blaner WS, et al. Association of postprandial triglyceride and retinyl palmitate responses with newly diagnosed exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in middle-aged men and women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:1829–1838
    1. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502
    1. Kinoshita M, Kojima M, Matsushima T, Teramoto T. Determination of apolipoprotein B-48 in serum by a sandwich ELISA. Clin Chim Acta 2005;351:115–120
    1. Sumner AE. Ethnic differences in triglyceride levels and high-density lipoprotein lead to underdiagnosis of the metabolic syndrome in black children and adults. J Pediatr 2009;155:e7–e11
    1. Syvänne M, Talmud PJ, Humphries SE, et al. Determinants of postprandial lipemia in men with coronary artery disease and low levels of HDL cholesterol. J Lipid Res 1997;38:1463–1472
    1. Cohn JS, McNamara JR, Cohn SD, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Plasma apolipoprotein changes in the triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction of human subjects fed a fat-rich meal. J Lipid Res 1988;29:925–936
    1. Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, et al. Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1237–1245
    1. Elam M, Lovato LC, Ginsberg H. Role of fibrates in cardiovascular disease prevention, the ACCORD-Lipid perspective. Curr Opin Lipidol 2011;22:55–61
    1. Reyes-Soffer G, Rondon-Clavo C, Ginsberg HN. Combination therapy with statin and fibrate in patients with dyslipidemia associated with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2011;12:1429–1438
    1. Rosenson RS, Wolff DA, Huskin AL, Helenowski IB, Rademaker AW. Fenofibrate therapy ameliorates fasting and postprandial lipoproteinemia, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2007;30:1945–1951
    1. Lai CQ, Arnett DK, Corella D, et al. Fenofibrate effect on triglyceride and postprandial response of apolipoprotein A5 variants: the GOLDN study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27:1417–1425
    1. Skoczyńska A, Kreczyńska B, Poreba R. Postprandial lipemia in diabetic men during hypolipemic therapy. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2009;119:461–468
    1. McLauglin T, Abbasi F, Lamendola C, Leary E, Reaven GM. Comparison in patients with type 2 diabetes of fibric acid versus hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl-coenzyme a redutase inhibitor treatment of combined dyslipidemia. Metabolism 2002;51:1355–1359
    1. Rivellese AA, De Natale C, Di Marino L, et al. Exogenous and endogenous postprandial lipid abnormalities in type 2 diabetic patients with optimal blood glucose control and optimal fasting triglyceride levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2153–2159
    1. Schoonjans K, Peinado-Onsurbe J, Lefebvre AM, et al. PPARalpha and PPARgamma activators direct a distinct tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene. EMBO J 1996;15:5336–5348
    1. Staels B, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K, Leitersdorf E, Fruchart J-C. Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Circulation 1998;98:2088–2093
    1. Malmendier CL, Lontie JF, Delcroix C, Dubois DY, Magot T, De Roy L. Apolipoproteins C-II and C-III metabolism in hypertriglyceridemic patients. Effect of a drastic triglyceride reduction by combined diet restriction and fenofibrate administration. Atherosclerosis 1989;77:139–149
    1. Ginsberg HN, Le NA, Goldberg IJ, et al. Apolipoprotein B metabolism in subjects with deficiency of apolipoproteins CIII and AI. Evidence that apolipoprotein CIII inhibits catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by lipoprotein lipase in vivo. J Clin Invest 1986;78:1287–1295

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다