Validity and reliability of two alternate versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Hong Kong version) for screening of Mild Neurocognitive Disorder

Adrian Wong, Stanley Yiu, Ziad Nasreddine, Kam-Tat Leung, Alexander Lau, Yannie O Y Soo, Lawrence Ka-Sing Wong, Vincent Mok, Adrian Wong, Stanley Yiu, Ziad Nasreddine, Kam-Tat Leung, Alexander Lau, Yannie O Y Soo, Lawrence Ka-Sing Wong, Vincent Mok

Abstract

Objective: Repeated testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) increases risks for practice effects which may bias measurements of cognitive change. The objective of this study is to develop two alternate versions of the MoCA (Hong Kong version; HK-MoCA) and to investigate the validity and reliability of the alternate versions in patients with DSM-5 Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (Mild NCD) and cognitively healthy controls.

Methods: Concurrent validity and inter-scale agreement were examined by Pearson correlation of the total scores between the original and alternate versions and the Bland-Altman Method. Criterion validity of the two alternate versions in differentiating patients with Mild NCD was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. One-month test-retest and inter-rater reliability were examined in 20 participants. Internal consistency of the alternate versions was measured by the Cronbach's α.

Results: 30 controls (age 73.4 [4.5] years, 60% female) and 30 patients (age 75.4 [5.5] years, 73% female) with Mild NCD were recruited. Both alternate versions significantly correlated with the original version (r = 0.79-0.87, p<0.001). Mean differences of 0.17 and -0.40 points were found between the total scores of the alternate with the original versions with a consistent level of agreement observed throughout the range of cognitive abilities. Both alternate versions significantly differentiated patients with Mild NCD from healthy controls (area under ROC 0.922 and 0.724, p<0.001) and showed good one-month test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation [ICC] = 0.92 and 0.82) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99 and 0.87) and high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.79 and 0.75).

Conclusion: The two alternate versions of the HK-MoCA are useful for Mild NCD screening.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Scatterplots depicting relationships between HK-MoCA-O…
Fig 1. Scatterplots depicting relationships between HK-MoCA-O with HK-MoCA-A1 (panel a) and HK-MoCA-A2 (panel b).
HK-MoCA-A1 (r = 0.87, p<0.001) and HK-MoCA-A2 (r = 0.79, p<0.001).
Fig 2. Bland Altman plots showing interscale…
Fig 2. Bland Altman plots showing interscale agreement between HK-MoCA-O with HK-MoCA-A1 (panel 2a) and HK-MoCA-A2 (panel 2b).
Fig 3. ROC curves for HK-MoCA-O, HK-MoCA-A1…
Fig 3. ROC curves for HK-MoCA-O, HK-MoCA-A1 and HK-MoCA-A2 in differentiating patients with Mild NCD from healthy controls.
Note that the individual ROC curves are derived from different samples (n = 60 for HK-MoCA-O, n = 30 HK-MoCA-A1 and n = 30 for HK-MoCA-A2 and combined in a single graph as shown here. AUCs are 0.839, p<0.001 for MoCA, 0.922, p<0.001 for HK-MoCA-A1 and 0.724, p<0.05 for HK-MoCA-A2.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 5th Edition Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Geda YE, Ivnik RJ, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(12):1447–55. Epub 2009/12/17. doi: .
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9. doi: .
    1. Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Xie SX, Stern MB, et al. Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2009;73(21):1738–45. doi: .
    1. Pendlebury ST, Cuthbertson FC, Welch SJ, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Underestimation of cognitive impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with transient ischemic attack and stroke: a population-based study. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2010;41(6):1290–3. doi: .
    1. Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Bickerton WL, Humphreys GW. The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(3):883–94. doi: .
    1. Kong AP, Lam PH, Ho DW, Lau JK, Humphreys GW, Riddoch J, et al. The Hong Kong version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (HK-OCS): validation study for Cantonese-speaking chronic stroke survivors. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016;23(5):530–48. doi: .
    1. Bickerton WL, Demeyere N, Francis D, Kumar V, Remoundou M, Balani A, et al. The BCoS cognitive profile screen: Utility and predictive value for stroke. Neuropsychology. 2015;29(4):638–48. doi: .
    1. Kong AP, Chan J, Lau JK, Bickerton WL, Weekes B, Humphreys G. Developing a Cantonese Version of Birmingham Cognitive Screen for Stroke Survivors in Hong Kong. Commun Disord Q. 2017.
    1. Yeung PY, Wong LL, Chan CC, Leung JL, Yung CY. A validation study of the Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20(6):504–10. doi: .
    1. Wong A, Xiong YY, Kwan PW, Chan AY, Lam WW, Wang K, et al. The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):81–7. doi: .
    1. Wong A, Xiong YY, Wang D, Lin S, Chu WW, Kwan PW, et al. The NINDS-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment neuropsychology protocols in Chinese. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2013;84(5):499–504. Epub 2012/12/20. doi: .
    1. Wong GK, Wong A, Zee BC, Poon WS, Chan MT, Gin T, et al. Cognitive outcome in acute simvastatin treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A propensity matched analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2015. doi: .
    1. Wong GK, Lam S, Ngai K, Wong A, Mok V, Poon WS, et al. Evaluation of cognitive impairment by the Montreal cognitive assessment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: prevalence, risk factors and correlations with 3 month outcomes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2012;83(11):1112–7. doi: .
    1. Wong GK, Lam SW, Wong A, Mok V, Siu D, Ngai K, et al. Early MoCA-assessed cognitive impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and relationship to 1-year functional outcome. Translational stroke research. 2014;5(2):286–91. doi: .
    1. Wong A, Law LS, Liu W, Wang Z, Lo ES, Lau A, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment: One Cutoff Never Fits All. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2015;46(12):3547–50. doi: .
    1. Wong A, Nyenhuis D, Black SE, Law LS, Lo ES, Kwan PW, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol is a brief, valid, reliable, and feasible cognitive screen for telephone administration. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2015;46(4):1059–64. doi: .
    1. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
    1. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela MJ, Lorentz LM, Koschera A. Progression of cognitive impairment in stroke patients. Neurology. 2004;63(9):1618–23. .
    1. Costa AS, Fimm B, Friesen P, Soundjock H, Rottschy C, Gross T, et al. Alternate-form reliability of the Montreal cognitive assessment screening test in a clinical setting. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(6):379–84. doi: .
    1. Chertkow H, Nasreddine Z, Johns E, Phillips N, McHenry C. The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): Validation of alternate forms and new recommendations for education corrections. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(4):S157.
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Patel BB. Validation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA, Alternate French Versions. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(5):665–71. doi: .
    1. Lam LC, Lui VW, Tam CW, Chiu HF. Subjective memory complaints in Chinese subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(9):876–82. Epub 2005/08/24. doi: .
    1. Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2220–41. Epub 2006/08/19. doi: .
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–86. .
    1. Smith A. Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Manual. Revised ed Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1982.
    1. Chan A. The Hong Kong List Learning Test. 2nd ed Hong Kong: Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2006.
    1. Yiu YPS, Leung KT, Mok V, Soo OYY, A. W, editors. Development and validation of the Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) alternate versions for screening of cognitive impairment. Brain 2017 The 14th Asia Pacific Multidisciplinary Meeting for Nervous System Diseases; 2017 January 6–7; Hong Kong.
    1. Chan AS, Poon MW. Performance of 7- to 95-year-old individuals in a Chinese version of the category fluency test. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999;5(6):525–33. .
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10. Epub 1986/02/08. .
    1. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29–36. Epub 1982/04/01. doi: .
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다