Smooth Extubation Techniques in Pediatric Patients After LeFort I Osteotomy

Teresa Anabel Lucín Yagual, Sócrates Marcelo Vivanco Murillo, Nataly Vanessa Espinoza Daquilema, Raisa Stefanía Mariscal García, Daniel Fernando Dick Paredes, Teresa Anabel Lucín Yagual, Sócrates Marcelo Vivanco Murillo, Nataly Vanessa Espinoza Daquilema, Raisa Stefanía Mariscal García, Daniel Fernando Dick Paredes

Abstract

The anesthetic approach to patients with facial deformities, such as midface hypoplasia (MFH), is complex and requires coordinated work with the surgical team. These patients may have a difficult airway (DA), and hence special considerations must be taken from the anesthetic point of view, and several options have been described by the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) related to this. Multiple methods have been described for intubation and maintenance; for extubation in pediatric patients, there are no defined guidelines. Extubation can be performed under deep anesthesia or with the patient awake, taking special considerations by keeping their condition in mind; these approaches have shown varying results. Favorable outcomes have been observed in the literature and personal experiences with smooth extubation techniques in patients at a high risk of reintubation, such as those with dentofacial deformities and the pediatric population. A 15-year-old girl with a diagnosis of severe malar hypoplasia associated with a cleft lip (CL) was admitted to our hospital. She had a history of previous surgeries and had persistent functional disorders, for which surgical placement of facial distractors was scheduled. For the anesthetic approach, a balanced general anesthesia option was chosen. The use of a video laryngoscope was determined to be the proper choice for DA, with the fixation of the oral endotracheal tube (OETT) in a caudal direction, and with mechanical-ventilator settings appropriate for the patient's age. Deep extubation with smooth extubation techniques was performed successfully. No anesthetic complications were observed in this case.

Keywords: difficult airway; difficult extubation; mid-facial hipoplasia; smooth extubation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Copyright © 2021, Lucín Yagual et al.

Figures

Figure 1. Lateral cephalic X-ray
Figure 1. Lateral cephalic X-ray
Mandibular prognathism was observed at the expense of maxillary hypoplasia (star). In soft tissues, there was drooping nasal tip (arrow); however, an unobstructed airway and preserved diameters were observed
Figure 2. Videolaryngoscopy and intubation
Figure 2. Videolaryngoscopy and intubation
A: open glottis (star). B: video-assisted endotracheal tube introduction
Figure 3. Rigid external distraction with intranasal…
Figure 3. Rigid external distraction with intranasal bone-borne traction Hooks for midfacial hypoplasia
Source: KLS Martin Group

References

    1. Rigid external distraction with intranasal bone-borne traction hooks for midfacial hypoplasia. Zheng Y, Tong H, Yin N, Niu F, Zhao Z, Song T. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9948.
    1. Comprehensive care of patients with cleft lip and palate. Palacios D. Odontol Act Rev Científica. 2020;5:27–30.
    1. Anesthetic management for maxillofacial surgery. López-León NL. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2015;38:247–249.
    1. The precise midline positioning instrument for Le Fort I Osteotomy. Sun X, Xiao Y, Wu G. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:0–2.
    1. Current panorama of the difficult airway. Rojas-Peñaloza J, Madrigal JMZ. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2018;41:0–2.
    1. Predictive scales to identify difficult airways in the pediatric population: their usefulness in the emergency department. Figueroa-Uribe F, Flores-del Razo JO, Vega-Rangel V, Méndez-Trejo V, Ferrer-López M, González-Chávez NA. Rev Mex Pediatría. 2019;86:162–164.
    1. Airway surgery «tips that lead to success». Carpio-Domínguez LE, Domínguez-Arroyo C, Álvarez-Cruz E. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología. 2018;41:0–3.
    1. Anesthetic considerations for orthognathic surgery: clinical case report. García Méndez N, González Ramírez PA, Crisostomo Pineda MM, Rivero Picazo C. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2013;41:69–74.
    1. Smooth extubation and smooth emergence techniques: a narrative review. Wong TH, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:8883257.
    1. Extubation of the perioperative patient with a difficult airway. Hagberg CA, Artime C. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2014;42:295–301.
    1. Assessment of soft tissue changes after LeFort I advancement. Akan B, Gökçe G, Karadede Ünal B, Sezen Erhamza T. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278:813–819.
    1. Extubation and emergence. Dalton A, Foulds L, Wallace C. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2015;9:465–470.
    1. All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of anticipated difficult extubation. Kundra P, Garg R, Patwa A, et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:915–921.
    1. Extubation of the challenging or difficult airway [Epub ahead of print] Parotto M, Cooper RM, Behringer EC. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2020:1–7.
    1. Predictors of pain and prolonged length of stay after orthognathic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Shinagawa A, Melhem FE, de Campos AC, Dias Cicarelli D, Frerichs E. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2015;43:129–135.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다