Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies

M Eccles, J Grimshaw, M Campbell, C Ramsay, M Eccles, J Grimshaw, M Campbell, C Ramsay

Abstract

The methods of evaluating change and improvement strategies are not well described. The design and conduct of a range of experimental and non-experimental quantitative designs are considered. Such study designs should usually be used in a context where they build on appropriate theoretical, qualitative and modelling work, particularly in the development of appropriate interventions. A range of experimental designs are discussed including single and multiple arm randomised controlled trials and the use of more complex factorial and block designs. The impact of randomisation at both group and individual levels and three non-experimental designs (uncontrolled before and after, controlled before and after, and time series analysis) are also considered. The design chosen will reflect both the needs (and resources) in any particular circumstances and also the purpose of the evaluation. The general principle underlying the choice of evaluative design is, however, simple-those conducting such evaluations should use the most robust design possible to minimise bias and maximise generalisability.

References

    1. Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1406-9
    1. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2000;5(6):339-48
    1. BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6
    1. Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):192-6
    1. Stat Med. 2002 Feb 15;21(3):397-405
    1. Clin Radiol. 2002 Jul;57(7):575-8
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Feb;21(1):124-30
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1967 Aug;20(8):637-48
    1. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1978 Sep;4(9):33-6
    1. Biometrics. 1980 Mar;36(1):19-25
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Mar;98(3):306-8
    1. Am Psychol. 1993 Dec;48(12):1181-209
    1. BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):941

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다