Impact of a nutritional supplement (Impryl) on male fertility: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (SUppleMent Male fERtility, SUMMER trial)

Roos Smits, Kathleen D'Hauwers, Joanna IntHout, Didi Braat, Kathrin Fleischer, Roos Smits, Kathleen D'Hauwers, Joanna IntHout, Didi Braat, Kathrin Fleischer

Abstract

Introduction: Infertility is a worldwide problem and about 10%-15% of all couples will be affected by the inability to have children. In approximately 50% of infertile couples, a male factor is involved. Most of the male infertile cases are characterised as 'idiopathic', except for a small percentage of cases which are causative by a genetic aetiology. In the past decade, the role of oxidative stress related to sperm quality has been researched thoroughly and estimated to be the problem in 25%-87% of male infertility cases. Impryl is a nutritional supplement which works on the metabolic system and the regulation of oxidative stress by activating the 1-carbon cycle and therefore recycling of homocysteine. We hypothesise that the nutritional supplement Impryl in men of infertile couples might improve the ongoing pregnancy rate.

Methods and analysis: We designed a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. We aimed to include 1200 male adults aged 18-50 years, part of a couple that is diagnosed with infertility. The couple will either start or has already been started with fertility treatment, that is, expectative management (duration of 6 months), intrauterine insemination (IUI) with or without mild ovarian stimulation or ovulation induction, either in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Male participants will be randomised in either the Impryl or the placebo group, with identical appearance of the tablets to be distributed (doses: one tablet each day), for a total duration of maximal 6 months. Patients can start directly with fertility treatment and/or natural conception. The primary outcome is the number of ongoing pregnancies confirmed by ultrasound at ≥10 to 12 weeks, and conceived in the time window between randomisation up to and including month 6 of intervention use. Secondary outcomes are change in semen parameters between baseline and after 3 months of intervention in the IUI/IVF/ICSI group, based on (prewash) total motile sperm count. Furthermore the number of pregnancies conceived in the optimal intervention time window (after full spermatogenesis of 72 days), overall number of pregnancies, time to pregnancy, embryo fertilisation rate in IVF/ICSI, embryo-utilisation rate in IVF/ICSI, number of miscarriages, live birth rate and adverse events are documented within the study period of 15 months.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol is approved by the local medical ethical review committee at the Radboud University Medical Centre and by the national Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. Findings will be shared with the academic and medical community, funding and patient organisations in order to contribute to optimisation of medical care and quality of life for patients with infertility.

Trial registration numbers: NCT03337360 and NTR6551.

Keywords: male infertility; nutritional support; reproductive medicine; subfertility.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The study is conducted by the department of gynaecology and obstetrics of the Radboudumc. As stated above in the funding section, an unrestricted grant from Goodlife Pharma B.V. was provided for the conduct of the trial.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart study design. ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IUI, intrauterine insemination; IVF, in vitro fertilisation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline study (T in months). EM, expectative management; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IUI, intrauterine insemination; IVF, in vitro fertilisation.

References

    1. Evers JLH. Female subfertility. Lancet 2002;360:151–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09417-5
    1. Winters BR, Walsh TJ. The epidemiology of male infertility. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:195–204. 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.006
    1. Aitken RJ, Buckingham D, West K, et al. . Differential contribution of leucocytes and spermatozoa to the generation of reactive oxygen species in the ejaculates of oligozoospermic patients and fertile donors. J Reprod Fertil 1992;94:451–62. 10.1530/jrf.0.0940451
    1. Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS. Cellular basis of defective sperm function and its association with the genesis of reactive oxygen species by human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1987;81:459–69. 10.1530/jrf.0.0810459
    1. Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS, Hargreave TB, et al. . Analysis of the relationship between defective sperm function and the generation of reactive oxygen species in cases of oligozoospermia. J Androl 1989;10:214–20. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00091.x
    1. Iwasaki A, Gagnon C. Formation of reactive oxygen species in spermatozoa of infertile patients. Fertil Steril 1992;57:409–16. 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54855-9
    1. Mazzilli F, Rossi T, Marchesini M, et al. . Superoxide anion in human semen related to seminal parameters and clinical aspects. Fertil Steril 1994;62:862–8. 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57017-4
    1. Shekarriz M, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Incidence and level of seminal reactive oxygen species in normal men. Urology 1995;45:103–7. 10.1016/s0090-4295(95)97088-6
    1. Zini A, de Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Reactive oxygen species in semen of infertile patients: levels of superoxide dismutase- and catalase-like activities in seminal plasma and spermatozoa. Int J Androl 1993;16:183–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1993.tb01177.x
    1. Mirończuk-Chodakowska I, Witkowska AM, Zujko ME. Endogenous non-enzymatic antioxidants in the human body. Adv Med Sci 2018;63:68–78. 10.1016/j.advms.2017.05.005
    1. Tremellen K. Oxidative stress and male infertility--a clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:243–58. 10.1093/humupd/dmn004
    1. Aitken J, Fisher H. Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: the balance of benefit and risk. Bioessays 1994;16:259–67. 10.1002/bies.950160409
    1. Jones R, Mann T. Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: the balance of benefit and risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B-Biological Sciences 1973;184:103–7.
    1. Lewis SEM, John Aitken R, Conner SJ, et al. . The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:325–37. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.014
    1. Aktan G, Doğru-Abbasoğlu S, Küçükgergin C, et al. . Mystery of idiopathic male infertility: is oxidative stress an actual risk? Fertil Steril 2013;99:1211–5. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.045
    1. Intasqui P, Antoniassi MP, Camargo M, et al. . Differences in the seminal plasma proteome are associated with oxidative stress levels in men with normal semen parameters. Fertil Steril 2015;104:292–301. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.037
    1. Cissen M, Wely Mvan, Scholten I, et al. . Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0165125. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165125
    1. Smits RM, Mackenzie-Proctor R, Yazdani A, et al. . Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:CD007411. 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub4
    1. Ménézo YJR, Hazout A, Panteix G, et al. . Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:418–21. 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60887-5
    1. Shan XQ, Aw TY, Jones DP. Glutathione-Dependent protection against oxidative injury. Pharmacol Ther 1990;47:61–71. 10.1016/0163-7258(90)90045-4
    1. Amar E, Cornet D, Cohen M, et al. . Treatment for high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation and nuclear decondensation: sequential teatment with a potent antioxidant followed by stimulation of the one-carbon cycle vs one-carbon cycle back-up alone. Austin J Reprod Medicatie 2015;2:1006.
    1. Perna AF, Ingrosso D, Lombardi C, et al. . Possible mechanisms of homocysteine toxicity. Kidney Int Suppl 2003;84:S137–40. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.63.s84.33.x
    1. Dattilo M, D'Amato G, Caroppo E, et al. . Improvement of gamete quality by stimulating and feeding the endogenous antioxidant system: mechanisms, clinical results, insights on gene-environment interactions and the role of diet. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:1633–48. 10.1007/s10815-016-0767-4
    1. Cornet D, Amar E, Cohen M, et al. . Clinical evidence for the importance of 1-carbon cycle support in subfertile couples. Austin J Reprod Medicatie 2015;2.
    1. Dattilo M, Cornet D, Amar E, et al. . The importance of the one carbon cycle nutritional support in human male fertility: a preliminary clinical report. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:71. 10.1186/1477-7827-12-71
    1. Noblanc A, Damon-Soubeyrand C, Karrich B, et al. . Dna oxidative damage in mammalian spermatozoa: where and why is the male nucleus affected? Free Radic Biol Med 2013;65:719–23. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.044
    1. Vorilhon S, Brugnon F, Kocer A, et al. . Accuracy of human sperm DNA oxidation quantification and threshold determination using an 8-OHdG immuno-detection assay. Hum Reprod 2018;33:553–62. 10.1093/humrep/dey038
    1. Bouwmans CAM, Lintsen BME, Eijkemans MJC, et al. . A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertil Steril 2008;89:331–41. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.003
    1. Fiddelers AAA, van Montfoort APA, Dirksen CD, et al. . Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2090–7. 10.1093/humrep/del112
    1. Haagen EC, Nelen WLDM, Adang EM, et al. . Guideline adherence is worth the effort: a cost-effectiveness analysis in intrauterine insemination care. Hum Reprod 2013;28:357–66. 10.1093/humrep/des408
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Stichting LIR 2015 NVOG IVF data in the Netherlands. [published Online First: june 2016.
    1. Custers IM, Steures P, Hompes P, et al. . Intrauterine insemination: how many cycles should we perform? Hum Reprod 2008;23:885–8. 10.1093/humrep/den008
    1. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:265–77. 10.1093/humupd/dmp003
    1. Haagen EC, Nelen WLDM, Grol RPTM, et al. . Variation in guideline adherence in intrauterine insemination care. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;20:533–42. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.016
    1. Showell M, Brown J, Yazdani A, et al. . Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;19:CD007411.
    1. World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen - Fifth edition, 2010.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다