The effects of empagliflozin, dietary energy restriction, or both on appetite-regulatory gut peptides in individuals with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity: The SEESAW randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Jack A Sargeant, James A King, Thomas Yates, Emma L Redman, Danielle H Bodicoat, Sudesna Chatterjee, Charlotte L Edwardson, Laura J Gray, Benoit Poulin, Ghazala Waheed, Helen L Waller, David R Webb, Scott A Willis, John P H Wilding, Kamlesh Khunti, David J Stensel, Melanie J Davies, Jack A Sargeant, James A King, Thomas Yates, Emma L Redman, Danielle H Bodicoat, Sudesna Chatterjee, Charlotte L Edwardson, Laura J Gray, Benoit Poulin, Ghazala Waheed, Helen L Waller, David R Webb, Scott A Willis, John P H Wilding, Kamlesh Khunti, David J Stensel, Melanie J Davies

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin (25 mg once-daily), dietary energy restriction, or both combined, on circulating appetite-regulatory peptides in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and overweight or obesity.

Materials and methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 68 adults (aged 30-75 years) with T2D (drug naïve or on metformin monotherapy; HbA1c 6.0%-10.0% [42-86 mmol/mol]) and body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or higher were randomized to (a) placebo only, (b) placebo plus diet, (c) empagliflozin only or (d) empagliflozin plus diet for 24 weeks. Dietary energy restriction matched the estimated energy deficit elicited by SGLT2 inhibitor therapy through urinary glucose excretion (~360 kcal/day). The primary outcome was change in postprandial circulating total peptide-YY (PYY) during a 3-hour mixed-meal tolerance test from baseline to 24 weeks. Postprandial total glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), acylated ghrelin and subjective appetite perceptions formed secondary outcomes, along with other key components of energy balance.

Results: The mean weight loss in each group at 24 weeks was 0.44, 1.91, 2.22 and 5.74 kg, respectively. The change from baseline to 24 weeks in postprandial total PYY was similar between experimental groups and placebo only (mean difference [95% CI]: -8.6 [-28.6 to 11.4], 13.4 [-6.1 to 33.0] and 1.0 [-18.0 to 19.9] pg/ml in placebo-plus diet, empagliflozin-only and empagliflozin-plus-diet groups, respectively [all P ≥ .18]). Similarly, there was no consistent pattern of difference between groups for postprandial total GLP-1, acylated ghrelin and subjective appetite perceptions.

Conclusions: In people with T2D and overweight or obesity, changes in postprandial appetite-regulatory gut peptides may not underpin the less than predicted weight loss observed with empagliflozin therapy.

Clinical trials registration: NCT02798744, www.

Clinicaltrials: gov; 2015-001594-40, www.EudraCT.ema.europa.eu; ISRCTN82062639, www.ISRCTN.org.

Keywords: SGLT2 inhibitors; compensation; energy balance; energy restriction; gut hormones.

Conflict of interest statement

JAS and TY report funding in the form of an investigator‐initiated trial from AstraZeneca. DRW has received honoraria as a speaker for AstraZeneca, Sanofi‐Aventis and Lilly, and has received research funding support from Novo Nordisk. JPHW reports receiving consultancy fees (paid to University of Liverpool) in relation to obesity and type 2 diabetes in the last 12 months from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Mundipharma, Napp, Novo Nordisk, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi and Saniona; personal fees honoraria/lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Napp, Mundipharma, Sanofi and Takeda; and research grant funding (via University of Liverpool) from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk. KK has acted as consultant, advisory board member and speaker for Abbott, Amgen, Astrazeneca, Bayer, NAPP, Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Berlin‐Chemie AG/Menarini Group, Sanofi‐Aventis, Servier and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has received EACME grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi‐Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme. MJD has acted as consultant, advisory board member and speaker for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim, an advisory board member and speaker for AstraZeneca, an advisory board member for Janssen, Lexicon, Servier and Gilead Sciences Ltd and as a speaker for Napp Pharmaceuticals, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc. She has received grants in support of investigator and investigator initiated trials from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi‐Aventis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Janssen. JAK, ELR, DHB, SC, CLE, LJG, BP, GW, HLW, SAW and DJS have no conflicts of interest to declare.

© 2022 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study consort diagram
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Difference between experimental groups and placebo‐only at each time point (open symbols) and across follow‐up (filled symbols) in A, Total body weight, B, Resting energy expenditure, C, Daily steps and, D, HbA1c. Data are presented as adjusted mean difference (experimental group minus placebo‐only) with 95% CI. All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI (both categorized as per randomization) and baseline value of the outcome, with analyses of daily steps additionally adjusted for accelerometer wear time. * Denotes comparison with placebo‐only group was statistically significant after application of Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure to account for multiple comparisons. GEE analyses across follow‐up can be inferred as the summary intervention effect. BMI, body mass index; GEE, generalized estimating equations
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Difference between experimental groups and placebo‐only at each time point (open symbols) and across follow‐up (filled symbols) in appetite‐regulatory gut peptides: A, Postprandial total PYY, B, Postprandial acylated ghrelin, C, Postprandial total GLP‐1, and D, Fasting leptin. Data are presented as adjusted mean difference (experimental group minus placebo‐only) with 95% CI. Postprandial responses were assessed as time‐averaged area under the concentration‐time curve during the standardized 3‐hour mixed meal tolerance test. All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI (both categorized as per randomization) and baseline value of the outcome. * Denotes comparison with placebo‐only group was statistically significant after application of Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure to account for multiple comparisons. GEE analyses across follow‐up can be inferred as the summary intervention effect. BMI, body mass index; GEE, generalized estimating equations; GLP‐1, glucagon‐like peptide‐1; PYY, peptide YY

References

    1. Scheen A. Sodium–glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16:556‐557.
    1. Brown E, Wilding JPH, Barber TM, Alam U, Cuthbertson DJ. Weight loss variability with SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP‐1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity: mechanistic possibilities. Obes Rev. 2019;20(6):816‐828.
    1. Op den Kamp YJM, de Ligt M, Dautzenberg B, et al. Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on energy metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double‐blind crossover trial. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(6):1334‐1343.
    1. Busetto L, Bettini S, Makaronidis J, Roberts CA, Halford JCG, Batterham RL. Mechanisms of weight regain. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;93:3‐7.
    1. Rajeev SP, Cuthbertson DJ, Wilding JPH. Energy balance and metabolic changes with sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;1–10:125‐134.
    1. Ferrannini G, Hach T, Crowe S, Sanghvi A, Hall KD, Ferrannini E. Energy balance after sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(9):1730‐1735.
    1. Polidori D, Sanghvi A, Seeley RJ, Hall KD. How strongly does appetite counter weight loss? Quantification of the feedback control of human energy intake. Obesity. 2016;24(11):2289‐2295.
    1. Matsuba I, Kanamori A, Takihata M, et al. Canagliflozin increases calorie intake in type 2 diabetes without changing the energy ratio of the three macronutrients: CANA‐K study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020;22(3):228‐234.
    1. Devenny JJ, Godonis HE, Harvey SJ, Rooney S, Cullen MJ, Pelleymounter MA. Weight loss induced by chronic dapagliflozin treatment is attenuated by compensatory hyperphagia in diet‐induced obese (DIO) rats. Obesity. 2012;20(8):1645‐1652.
    1. Blundell JE, Gibbons C, Beaulieu K, et al. The drive to eat in homo sapiens: energy expenditure drives energy intake. Physiol Behav. 2020;219:112846.
    1. Verdich C, Flint A, Gutzwiller JP, et al. A meta‐analysis of the effect of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (7‐36) amide on ad libitum energy intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(9):4382‐4389.
    1. Batterham R, Bloom S. The gut hormone PYY regulates appetite. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;994:162‐168.
    1. Drazen DL, Vahl TP, D'Alessio DA, Seeley RJ, Woods SC. Effects of a fixed meal pattern on ghrelin secretion: evidence for a learned response independent of nutrient status. Endocrinology. 2006;147(1):23‐30.
    1. Wren A, Cohen M, Brynes A, et al. Ghrelin enhances appetite and increases food intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(12):5992‐5995.
    1. Friedman JM. The function of leptin in nutrition, weight, and physiology. Nutr Rev. 2002;60(10):1‐14.
    1. Woods S, Lotter E, McKay L, Porte D. Chronic intracerebraoventricular infusion of insulin reduces food intake and body weight in baboons. Nature. 1979;282:503‐505.
    1. Ferrannini E, Muscelli E, Frascerra S, et al. Metabolic response to sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(2):499‐508.
    1. Wu P, Wen W, Li J, et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of SGLT2 inhibitor on blood leptin and adiponectin level in patients with type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res. 2019;51(8):487‐494.
    1. Martins C, Dutton GR, Hunter GR, Gower BA. Revisiting the compensatory theory as an explanatory model for relapse in obesity management. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(5):1170‐1179.
    1. Bertran E, Berlie HD, Nixon A, Jaber L. Does dapagliflozin affect energy intake and appetite? A randomized, controlled exploratory study in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019;8(1):119‐125.
    1. Ueno H, Nakazato H, Ebihara E, et al. Effects of ipragliflozin on postprandial glucose metabolism and gut peptides in type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(1):403‐411.
    1. Miura H, Sakaguchi K, Okada Y, et al. Effects of ipragliflozin on glycemic control, appetite and its related hormones: a prospective, multicenter, open‐label study (SOAR‐KOBE study). J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(5):1254‐1261.
    1. Dye L, Blundell J. Menstrual cycle and appetite control: implications for weight regulation. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(6):1142‐1151.
    1. Heise T, Seewaldt‐Becker E, Macha S, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following 4 weeks' treatment with empagliflozin once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(7):613‐621.
    1. Chandarana K, Drew ME, Emmanuel J, et al. Subject standardization, acclimatization, and sample processing affect gut hormone levels and appetite in humans. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(7):2115‐2126.
    1. Flint A, Raben A, Blundell JE, Astrup A. Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(1):38‐48.
    1. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three‐factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychom Res. 1985;29(1):71‐83.
    1. Sargeant JA, Jelleyman C, Coull NA, et al. Improvements in glycemic control after acute moderate‐intensity continuous or high‐intensity interval exercise are greater in South Asians than White Europeans with nondiabetic hyperglycemia: a randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):201‐209.
    1. Yates T, Edwardson CL, Celis‐Morales C, et al. Metabolic effects of breaking prolonged sitting with standing or light walking in older south asians and white europeans: a randomized acute study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(1):139‐146.
    1. Broom DR, Batterham RL, King JA, Stensel DJ. Influence of resistance and aerobic exercise on hunger, circulating levels of acylated ghrelin, and peptide YY in healthy males. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;296(1):R29‐R35.
    1. Ballantyne GH. Peptide YY(1‐36) and peptide YY(3‐36): part I. Distribution, release and actions. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):651‐658.
    1. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Incretin hormones: their role in health and disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:5‐21.
    1. Mihalache L, Gherasim A, Niță O, et al. Effects of ghrelin in energy balance and body weight homeostasis. Hormones. 2016;15(2):186‐196.
    1. Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, et al. Long‐term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(17):1597‐1604.
    1. le Roux CW, Batterham RL, Aylwin SJB, et al. Attenuated peptide YY release in obese subjects is associated with reduced satiety. Endocrinology. 2006;147(1):3‐8.
    1. MacLean PS, Bergouignan A, Cornier MA, Jackman MR. Biology's response to dieting: the impetus for weight regain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;301(3):R581‐R600.
    1. Niswender KD, Schwartz MW. Insulin and leptin revisited: adiposity signals with overlapping physiological and intracellular signaling capabilities. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2003;24(1):1‐10.
    1. Rajeev SP, Sprung VS, Roberts C, et al. Compensatory changes in energy balance during dapagliflozin treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over trial (ENERGIZE)—study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):1‐9.
    1. Rajeev SP, Roberts CA, Cuthbertson DJ, et al. Changes in energy balance during dapagliflozin therapy in type 2 diabetes—the energize study. Diabetes. 2018;67(S1):1163‐P.
    1. Tanaka K, Takahashi H, Katagiri S, et al. Combined effect of canagliflozin and exercise training on high‐fat diet‐fed mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020;318(4):E492‐E503.
    1. Rowlands A, Davies M, Dempsey P, Edwardson C, Razieh C, Yates T. Wrist‐worn accelerometers: recommending ~1.0 m g as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in daily average acceleration for inactive adults. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(14):814‐815.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다