Pre-warming the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) improves fitting to the laryngeal structure: a randomized, double-blind study

Hyun Kang, Dong Rim Kim, Yong Hun Jung, Chong Wha Baek, Yong Hee Park, Jong In Oh, Won Joong Kim, Geun Joo Choi, Hyun Kang, Dong Rim Kim, Yong Hun Jung, Chong Wha Baek, Yong Hee Park, Jong In Oh, Won Joong Kim, Geun Joo Choi

Abstract

Background: The Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA), a type of supraglottic airway, has a non-inflatable cuff that softens at body temperature to fit the laryngeal structure. We investigated whether pre-warming of SLIPA to body temperature may improve insertion parameters.

Methods: Ninety adult patients were assigned equally randomized to either Group W or Group R. Anesthesia was induced using propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium. In Group W, the SLIPA was warmed to 37 ° C before insertion, whereas in Group R, it was inserted at room temperature. The insertion time, oropharyngeal leak pressure, postoperative throat pain, blood staining, regurgitation, number of attempts at insertion, and difficulty of insertion were compared between the two groups.

Results: The insertion time was shorter in Group W than in Group R (3.60 [3.15-4.06] s vs. 6.00 [4.45-7.50] s; P < 0.001). Oropharyngeal leak pressure from the time of insertion until 3 min after insertion was significantly higher in Group W than in Group R (P < 0.05). Postoperative throat pain, measured using the visual analog scale, was lower in Group W than in Group R (0.00 [0.00-2.50] vs. 2.00 [0.00-4.50]; P = 0.006). The difficulty of insertion was lower in Group W than in Group R (P < 0.004). There were no significant differences in terms of blood staining, regurgitation, and number of attempts.

Conclusions: Pre-warming the SLIPA to body temperature has significant benefits compared to maintaining the device at room temperature. Specifically, insertion was easier, both insertion and fitting to the laryngeal structure could be performed more quickly, and the incidence of sore throat was reduced.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Identifier NCT01209000.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram. The progress of patients through the trial is shown. Group R: the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) was kept at room temperature; Group W: the SLIPA was pre-warmed to 37 ° C
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). OLP increased gradually over time in both groups. However, the mean OLP in Group W was significantly higher than that in Group R from the point of insertion until 3 min after insertion. Group R: the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) was kept at room temperature; Group W: the SLIPA was pre-warmed to 37 ° C. Values are expressed as the mean ± SE. *P < 0.05
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Insertion time. The insertion time was faster in Group W (3.60 s [3.15–4.06 s]) than in Group R. Box-and-whisker plot (median, interquartile range, and range) of the insertion time in Group R and Group W. Group R: the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) was kept at room temperature; Group W: the SLIPA was pre-warmed to 37 ° C. *P < 0.001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Postoperative throat pain (visual analog scale [VAS]). Postoperative throat pain, determined using the VAS, was lower in Group W than in Group R. Box-and-whisker plot (median, interquartile range, and range) of the VAS in Group R and Group W. Group R: the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) was kept at room temperature; Group W group: the SLIPA was pre-warmed to 37 ° C. *P = 0.006

References

    1. Woo YC, Cha SM, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY, et al. Less perilaryngeal gas leakage with SLIPA than with LMA-ProSeal in paralyzed patients. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:48–54. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9412-3.
    1. Xu J, Zhong TD. Comparison and superiority of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway to laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopy. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2010;90:49–52.
    1. Choi GJ, Kang H. Safety and clinical usefulness of supraglottic airway device. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015;58:905–914. doi: 10.5124/jkma.2015.58.10.905.
    1. Choi GJ, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC, Kim SH, et al. Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) and laryngeal mask airway: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:613–22. doi: 10.1111/anae.13035.
    1. Ahn EJ, Kang H, Choi GJ, Yang SY, Shin HY, Baek CW, et al. Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway: Randomized comparison of size selection strategies with regard to patient height vs. thyroid cartilage width. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2015;22:303–11.
    1. Cha SM, Park S, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Cha YJ, et al. Gastric distension with SLIPA versus LMA ProSeal during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:216–20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182905bb6.
    1. Siddiqui NT, Khan FH. Haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation via intubating laryngeal mask airway versus direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57:11–4.
    1. Kahl M, Eberhart LH, Behnke H, Sänger S, Schwarz U, Vogt S, et al. Stress response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery: direct laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:275–80. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.005.
    1. Voyagis GS. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube for airway control. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 1997;14:25–31.
    1. Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:260–3. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70139-3.
    1. Yu SH, Beirne OR. Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:2359–76. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.017.
    1. Kaplan A, Crosby GJ, Bhattacharyya N. Airway protection and the laryngeal mask airway in sinus and nasal surgery. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:652–5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00010.
    1. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Asai T. Which supraglottic airway will serve my patient best? Anaesthesia. 2014;69:1189–92. doi: 10.1111/anae.12856.
    1. Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, Shanks AM, Kheterpal S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique: a study of 15,795 patients. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1217–26. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318255e6ab.
    1. Nicholson A, Cook TM, Smith AF, Lewis SR, Reed SS. Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:Cd010105.
    1. Luce V, Harkouk H, Brasher C, Michelet D, Hilly J, Maesani M, et al. Supraglottic airway devices vs tracheal intubation in children: a quantitative meta-analysis of respiratory complications. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:1088–98. doi: 10.1111/pan.12495.
    1. Bernardini A, Natalini G. Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube: analysis on 65 712 procedures with positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:1289–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06140.x.
    1. Miller DM. A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: a brief review. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1553–9. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000134798.00069.2B.
    1. Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:136–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02962.x.
    1. Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Acta Anaesth Belg. 2012;63:35–41.
    1. Lim BG, Kim KJ, Kong MH, Kim NS, Lim SH, Lee MK, et al. SLIPA may be more useful than other LMADs for difficult airway management. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:120–1. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9605-4.
    1. Abdellatif AA, Ali MA. Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5:270–6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.84100.
    1. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:286–7. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.2.286.
    1. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the i-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:1022–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04258.x.
    1. Nishiyama T, Kohno Y, Kim HJ, Shin WJ, Yang HS. The effects of prewarming the i-gel on fitting to laryngeal structure. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:1756–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.02.009.
    1. Komasawa N, Nishihara I, Tatsumi S, Minami T. Prewarming of the i-gel facilitates successful insertion and ventilation efficacy with muscle relaxation: a randomized study. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:663–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.08.009.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다