Effect of prucalopride on symptoms of chronic constipation

J Tack, V Stanghellini, D Dubois, A Joseph, L Vandeplassche, R Kerstens, J Tack, V Stanghellini, D Dubois, A Joseph, L Vandeplassche, R Kerstens

Abstract

Background: Prucalopride is a 5-HT4 receptor agonist with gastrointestinal prokinetic activities. This integrated analysis of data from three 12-week, double-blind trials evaluated the effect of prucalopride 2 mg q.d. on common constipation symptoms in women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief. The effect of prucalopride on bowel function was outside the scope of the analysis and has been described elsewhere.

Methods: Women with self-reported inadequate relief from laxatives and included in the prucalopride 2 mg or placebo arm of the trials were selected for analysis. Symptom severity was determined with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire. Observed changes from baseline in individual item scores were also evaluated by calculating Cohen's D effect sizes using baseline standard deviation (SD) (>0.2-0.5, >0.5-0.8 and >0.8 for small, moderate and large effects, respectively).

Key results: Data were analyzed for 936 women. The proportion of women with a PAC-SYM severity score >2 at baseline was 50.0% for abdominal symptoms, 71.4% for stool symptoms, and 15.5% for rectal symptoms. Excluding the women without presence of a symptom at baseline from the effect size calculations showed that prucalopride 2 mg had a large effect (>0.8) on all PAC-SYM items, including abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, bloating, straining, and painful bowel movements. For abdominal symptoms and stool symptoms, effect sizes with prucalopride 2 mg were 1.3-2.3 times larger than those with placebo.

Conclusions & inferences: Prucalopride 2 mg q.d. for 12 weeks alleviates common constipation symptoms in women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00483886 NCT00485940 NCT00488137.

Keywords: PAC-SYM; abdominal discomfort; bloating; chronic constipation; painful bowel movements; prucalopride.

© 2013 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PAC-SYM effect sizes at week 12 in women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief – integrated analysis of three identical double-blind phase III trials – including women without presence of a symptom at baseline. BM, bowel movement; PRU, prucalopride.

References

    1. Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750–9.
    1. Stewart W, Liberman J, Sandler R, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3530–40.
    1. Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Available at: (accessed 11 July 2012)
    1. Johanson JF, Kralstein J. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:599–608.
    1. Herz MJ, Kahan E, Zalevski S, Aframian R, Kuznitz D, Reichman S. Constipation: a different entity for patients and doctors. Fam Pract. 1996;13:156–9.
    1. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480–91.
    1. World Gastroenterology Organisation. World Gastroenterology Organisation Practice Guidelines: Constipation. 2007. Available at: (accessed 11 July 2012)
    1. Locke GR, 3rd, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1761–6.
    1. American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(Suppl. 1):S1–4.
    1. O'Keefe EA, Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Jacobsen SJ. Bowel disorders impair functional status and quality of life in the elderly: a population-based study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M184–9.
    1. Chang L. Review article: epidemiology and quality of life in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(Suppl. 7):31–9.
    1. Glia A, Lindberg G. Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1083–9.
    1. Camilleri M, Kerstens R, Rykx A, Vandeplassche L. A placebo-controlled trial of prucalopride for severe chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2344–54.
    1. Quigley EM, Vandeplassche L, Kerstens R, Ausma J. Clinical trial: the efficacy, impact on quality of life, and safety and tolerability of prucalopride in severe chronic constipation – a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:315–28.
    1. Tack J, Van Outryve M, Beyens G, Kerstens R, Vandeplassche L. Prucalopride (Resolor) in the treatment of severe chronic constipation in patients dissatisfied with laxatives. Gut. 2009;58:357–65.
    1. Resolor® (prucalopride) Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: (accessed 11 July 2012)
    1. Tack J, Quigley E, Camilleri M, Vandeplassche L, Kerstens R. Efficacy and safety of oral prucalopride in women with chronic constipation in whom laxatives have failed: an integrated analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2013;1:48–59.
    1. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Müller-Lissner SA. ROME II: a multinational consensus document on functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut. 1999;45(Suppl. II):II43–7.
    1. Frank L, Kleinman L, Farup C, Taylor L, Miner P., Jr Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:870–7.
    1. Dubois D, Gilet H, Viala-Danten M, Tack J. Psychometric performance and clinical meaningfulness of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life questionnaire in prucalopride (RESOLOR) trials for chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:e54–63.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available at: (accessed December 2009)

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다