Galcanezumab Provides Consistent Efficacy Throughout the Dosing Interval Among Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine: A Post Hoc Analysis

Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Karen H Samaan, Todd J Schwedt, Robert A Nicholson, Mallikarjuna Rettiganti, Eric M Pearlman, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Karen H Samaan, Todd J Schwedt, Robert A Nicholson, Mallikarjuna Rettiganti, Eric M Pearlman

Abstract

Introduction: The consistency of the treatment effect of galcanezumab throughout the dosing interval is examined in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

Methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data from episodic (EVOLVE-1; EVOLVE-2; both 6-month duration) and chronic (REGAIN; 3-month duration) migraine double-blind trials evaluating the efficacy of a once-monthly injection of galcanezumab 120 mg relative to placebo. Adults with episodic (placebo, n = 894; galcanezumab, n = 444) or chronic migraine (placebo, n = 558; galcanezumab, n = 278) were included. Mean change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days, averaged across all months for each week of the dosing interval, was compared between groups and within the galcanezumab group during weeks 1 and 4. Additional analyses examined the mean difference from placebo in weekly migraine headache days and a day-by-day analysis.

Results: Weekly migraine headache day reduction was significantly greater with galcanezumab relative to placebo every week (P < 0.001) and did not differ during weeks 1 and 4 for those with episodic (P = 0.740) or chronic migraine (P = 0.231) taking galcanezumab. Estimated probabilities of migraine on day 2 and day 30 did not differ for those with episodic (P = 0.61) or chronic migraine (P = 0.616) taking galcanezumab.

Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates once monthly galcanezumab exhibits consistent efficacy throughout the dosing interval among the population of patients with migraine in three clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of galcanezumab. There is no evidence from these trials that the effect of galcanezumab "wears off" at the end of the dosing interval.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: EVOLVE-1 (NCT02614183); EVOLVE-2 (NCT02614196); REGAIN (NCT02614261).

Keywords: Chronic; Efficacy; Episodic; Galcanezumab; Migraine; Wear off.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Episodic migraine: LS mean change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days across all months (EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 pooled). aP < 0.001 versus placebo based on MMRM analysis. Mean changes from baseline for each treatment group were estimated using an MMRM model for repeated measures after adjusting for baseline migraine headache days, week, month, study, pooled region/country (nested within study), and the treatment-by-week and baseline-by-week interaction effects. GMB galcanezumab, LS least-squares, MMRM mixed-model repeated measures, SE standard error
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Episodic migraine: estimated probability of migraine by day averaged across all 6 months (EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 pooled). aP ≤ 0.001 versus placebo (P values comparing probability of migraine between the two groups was significant for all days). Probabilities shown for each treatment group were estimated using a generalized linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures adjusting for baseline migraine headache days, day, month, study, and treatment-by-day interaction effect. GMB galcanezumab
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Chronic migraine: LS mean change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days across all months (REGAIN) for each treatment group. aP < 0.001 versus placebo based on MMRM analysis. Mean changes from baseline for each treatment group were estimated using an MMRM model for repeated measures after adjusting for baseline migraine headache days, week, month, pooled region/country, and the treatment-by-week and baseline-by-week interaction effects. GMB galcanezumab, LS least squares, MMRM mixed-model repeated measures, SE standard error
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Chronic migraine: estimated probability of migraine by day averaged across all 3 months (REGAIN). aP ≤ 0.001 versus placebo, bP ≤ 0.010 versus placebo, cP < 0.050 versus placebo. Probabilities shown for each treatment group were estimated using a generalized linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures adjusting for baseline migraine headache days, day, month, and treatment-by-day interaction effect. GMB galcanezumab

References

    1. Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP. Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:307–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.071.
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF, AMPP Advisory Group Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343–349. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21.
    1. Lipton RB, Araujo AB, Nicholson RA, et al. Patterns of diagnosis, consultation, and treatment of migraine in the US: results of the OVERCOME study. In: 61st Annual Scientific Meeting American Headache Society® 2019 Headache. 2019;59:2–3. 10.1111/head.13549.
    1. Ashina S, Nicholson RA, Buse DC, et al. Identifying barriers to care-seeking, diagnosis, and preventive medication among those with migraine: results of the OVERCOME study [abstract] Headache. 2020;60(S1):127–128.
    1. Nicholson RA, Lipton RB, Reed ML, et al. Characteristics of individuals with migraine who are eligible for novel CGRP monoclonal antibodies: results of the OVERCOME study [abstract] Headache. 2020;60(S1):126–127.
    1. Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20:22–33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22.
    1. D’Amico D, Tepper SJ. Prophylaxis of migraine: general principles and patient acceptance. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008;4:1155–1167. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S3497.
    1. EMGALITY (Prescribing Information). Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company, 2019. .
    1. Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1080–1088. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212.
    1. Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim B-K, Yang JY. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1442–1454. doi: 10.1177/0333102418779543.
    1. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;19:e2211–e2221. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640.
    1. Detke HC, Millen BA, Zhang Q, et al. Rapid onset of effect of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: analysis of the EVOLVE studies. Headache. 2020;60:348–359. doi: 10.1111/head.13691.
    1. Förderreuther S, Zhang Q, Stauffer VL, Aurora SK, Lainez MJA. Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:121. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658.
    1. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell CA, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualititave studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3.
    1. Reynolds BM, Robles TF, Repetti RL. Measurement reactivity and fatigue effects in daily diary research with families. Dev Psychol. 2016;52:442–456. doi: 10.1037/dev0000081.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다