Use of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule to enable direct oral penicillin provocation: an international multicentre randomised control trial in an adult population (PALACE): study protocol

Ana-Maria Copaescu, Fiona James, Sara Vogrin, Morgan Rose, Kyra Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Nicholas A Turner, Cosby Stone, Elizabeth Phillips, Jason Trubiano, Ana-Maria Copaescu, Fiona James, Sara Vogrin, Morgan Rose, Kyra Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Nicholas A Turner, Cosby Stone, Elizabeth Phillips, Jason Trubiano

Abstract

Introduction: Penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in the healthcare setting and associated with the prescription of second-line inferior antibiotics. More than 85% of all penicillin allergy labels can be removed by skin testing and 96%-99% of low-risk penicillin allergy labels can be removed by direct oral challenge. An internally and externally validated clinical assessment tool for penicillin allergy, PEN-FAST, can identify a low-risk penicillin allergy without the need for skin testing; a score of less than 3 has a negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 94.1 to 97.8) for the presence of a penicillin allergy. It is hypothesised that PEN-FAST is a safe and effective tool for assessing penicillin allergy in an outpatient clinic setting.

Methods and analysis: This is an international, multicentre randomised control trial using the PEN-FAST tool to risk-stratify penicillin allergy labels in adult outpatients. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of using PEN-FAST score-guided management with direct oral challenge compared with standard care (defined as prick and intradermal skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention arm (direct oral penicillin challenge) or standard of care arm (skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge, if skin testing is negative). The sample size of 380 randomised patients (190 per treatment arm) is required to demonstrate non-inferiority.

Ethics and dissemination: The study will be performed according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/62425/Austin-2020) in Melbourne Australia, Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB #202174) in Tennessee, USA, Duke University Institutional Review Board (IRB #Pro00108461) in North Carolina, USA and McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board in Canada (PALACE/2022-7605). The results of this study will be published and presented in various scientific forums.

Trial registration number: NCT04454229.

Keywords: IMMUNOLOGY; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; Protocols & guidelines; Public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PEN-FAST clinical decision rule. aForms of severe delayed reactions include potential Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis. Patients with a severe delayed rash with mucosal involvement should be considered to have a severe cutaneous adverse reaction. Acute interstitial nephritis, drug-induced liver injury, serum sickness and isolated drug fever were excluded phenotypes from the derivation and validation cohorts. bIncludes unknown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the study design. ■Penicillin unspecified, penicillin VK/G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin, semisynthetic antistaphylococcal penicillins. ∆Skin prick testing followed by intradermal testing using standard beta-lactam panel.

References

    1. Charneski L, Deshpande G, Smith SW. Impact of an antimicrobial allergy label in the medical record on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. Pharmacotherapy 2011;31:742–7. 10.1592/phco.31.8.742
    1. Huang K-HG, Cluzet V, Hamilton K, et al. . The impact of reported beta-lactam allergy in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies requiring antibiotics. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67): :27–33. 10.1093/cid/ciy037
    1. Trubiano JA, Chen C, Cheng AC, et al. . Antimicrobial allergy 'labels' drive inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing: lessons for stewardship. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71:1715–22. 10.1093/jac/dkw008
    1. MacFadden DR, LaDelfa A, Leen J, et al. . Impact of reported beta-lactam allergy on inpatient outcomes: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:904–10. 10.1093/cid/ciw462
    1. Trubiano JA, Pai Mangalore R, Baey Y-W, et al. . Old but not forgotten: antibiotic allergies in general medicine (the AGM study). Med J Aust 2016;204:273. 10.5694/mja15.01329
    1. Blumenthal KG, Lu N, Zhang Y, et al. . Risk of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in patients with a documented penicillin allergy: population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2018;361:k2400. 10.1136/bmj.k2400
    1. Moran R, Devchand M, Smibert O, et al. . Antibiotic allergy labels in hospitalized and critically ill adults: a review of current impacts of inaccurate labelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019;85:492–500. 10.1111/bcp.13830
    1. Trubiano JA, Thursky KA, Stewardson AJ, et al. . Impact of an integrated antibiotic allergy testing program on antimicrobial stewardship: a multicenter evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:166–74. 10.1093/cid/cix244
    1. Trubiano JA, Smibert O, Douglas A, et al. . The safety and efficacy of an oral penicillin challenge program in cancer patients: a multicenter pilot study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018;5:ofy306. 10.1093/ofid/ofy306
    1. Koo G, Stollings JL, Lindsell C, et al. . Low-risk penicillin allergy delabeling through a direct oral challenge in immunocompromised and/or multiple drug allergy labeled patients in a critical care setting. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2022;10:1660–3. 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.01.041
    1. Stone CA, Stollings JL, Lindsell CJ, et al. . Risk-stratified management to remove low-risk penicillin allergy labels in the ICU. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201:1572–5. 10.1164/rccm.202001-0089LE
    1. Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, et al. . Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:745. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403
    1. Mustafa SS, Conn K, Ramsey A. Comparing direct challenge to penicillin skin testing for the outpatient evaluation of penicillin allergy: a randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019;7:2163–70. 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.037
    1. Savic L, Gurr L, Kaura V, et al. . Penicillin allergy de-labelling ahead of elective surgery: feasibility and barriers. Br J Anaesth 2019;123:e110–6. 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.009
    1. Tucker MH, Lomas CM, Ramchandar N, et al. . Amoxicillin challenge without penicillin skin testing in evaluation of penicillin allergy in a cohort of marine recruits. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017;5:813–5. 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.01.023
    1. Kuruvilla M, Shih J, Patel K, et al. . Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc 2019;40:57–61. 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184
    1. Stevenson B, Trevenen M, Klinken E, et al. . Multicenter Australian study to determine criteria for low- and high-risk penicillin testing in outpatients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:681–9. 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.025
    1. Sousa-Pinto B, Tarrio I, Blumenthal KG, et al. . Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;147:296–308. 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.058
    1. Sullivan TR, White IR, Salter AB, et al. . Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials? Stat Methods Med Res 2018;27:2610–26. 10.1177/0962280216683570
    1. World Medical Association . WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for medical research involving human subjects, 2013. Available: [Accessed 26 Jul 2020].
    1. Wilson A, Trubiano JA, Chua KYL. Patient perspectives on antibiotic allergy delabeling: Enablers and barriers. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:3637–9. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.017

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다