The Rationale for Photobiomodulation Therapy of Vaginal Tissue for Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: An Analysis of Its Mechanism of Action, and Current Clinical Outcomes

Raymond J Lanzafame, Sarah de la Torre, Gustavo H Leibaschoff, Raymond J Lanzafame, Sarah de la Torre, Gustavo H Leibaschoff

Abstract

Objective: Light, particularly in the visible to far-infrared spectrum, has been applied to the female genital tract with lasers and other devices for nearly 50 years. These have included procedures on both normal and neoplastic tissues, management of condylomata, endometriosis, and menometrorrhagia, and, more recently, a number of fractional laser devices have been applied for the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and to achieve so-called vaginal rejuvenation. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been proposed as an alternative for use in managing GSM and SUI. Methods: This article reviews the biological basis, symptoms, and management of GSM, and investigates the current status and rationale for the use of PBMT. Results and conclusions: Based on the preliminary evidence available, PBMT is safe and appears to be efficacious in treating GSM.

Keywords: collagen; genitourinary syndrome of menopause; photobiomodulation; stress urinary incontinence; tissue regeneration and healing; vagina; womens' health.

Conflict of interest statement

R.J.L.: Received grant funding from Apira Science; received equipment from Apira Science, ImArcSys, and LiteCure; serves as a Consultant for Joylux; holds intellectual property rights with Biomedical Gateway LLC, Conversion Energy Enterprises, ImArcSys, and New Skin Therapies LLC; serves as Officer or Director for the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery (CME Director), Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (Executive Director/Scientific Chair); SGE Consultant General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee of the FDA CDRH; Editorial Board and Associate Editor of Lasers in Medical Science, and is Executive Editor of Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery.

S.T.: Serves as Clinical Teaching Faculty at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, is affiliated with Swedish Medical Center, and is the Chief Medical Officer of Joylux.

G.H.L.: Serves as General Secretary and Founder of the World Society of Cosmetic Gynecology, President of the International Union of Lipoplasty, Codirector of the University Course of Specialist in Aesthetic and Functional Gynecology and Female Aesthetic Genital Surgery University of Barcelona, Spain, Vice President of ISRAIT-The International Society of Reconstructive and Aesthetic Intimate Treatment, and is a Consultant for Joylux.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The vSculpt device is demonstrated. The anterior aspect (top) of the device is shown (A, C). The posterior aspect (bottom) of the device is shown (B). The scale of the device is demonstrated (C).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
The vSculpt LED source configuration and light distribution are demonstrated. Anterior device views are shown both without (A) and with device activation (C). Lateral device views are shown both without (B) and with device activation (D). LED, light-emitting diode.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Histology from Subject 1 before (A) and 3 months after treatment (B) demonstrating restructuring of the lamina propria of the vaginal mucosa with collagenesis (100 × ).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Histology from Subject 2 taken at baseline (A) and 3 months (B) demonstrating increased cellularity and vascularization (100 × ).
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Representative histology demonstrating a complete restorative reaction at the level of the ECM with increased cellularity and angiogenesis 3 months after treatment (A, 40 × ) and significant collagenesis (B, 100 × ). ECM, extracellular matrix.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Histology of Subject 3 demonstrating papillomatosis, increased glucogenic load and thickness of the vaginal epithelium, with acanthosis and parakeratosis, increased cellularity, and a complete restorative reaction at the level of the ECM at 3 months after treatment (B, 100 × ). Compared with baseline (A).
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Histology of Subject 5 demonstrating noticeable changes at the level of the lamina propria from baseline (A) and at 3 months following treatment (B) with a 5-mm-thick epidermal layer (100 × ). The yellow line denotes marked expansion of stratified epidermis with a thick layer of glycogenated cells and elongation of the papillae.
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.
Representative histology in one study subject (A 40 × , B 100 × ). The inset in (A) corresponds to the area demonstrated in the higher magnification view in (B). The vaginal mucosa is covered with a thick stratified glucogenic squamous epithelium with irregular acanthosis and papillae elongation. The basal layer is preserved and there is marked acanthosis and basal cell hyperplasia. There is mild parakeratosis and conservation of the superficial strata. The epithelium is nondysplastic and eutrophic. The chorion is edematous with foci of papillary hemorrhage, with capillary vessels and lymphatic ectasia. No signs of thermal injury are observed. Congestive vaginal mucosa is present.

References

    1. FDA Warns Against Use of Energy-Based Devices to Perform Vaginal “Rejuvenation” or Vaginal Cosmetic Procedures: FDA Safety Communication. Available at: (Last accessed July30, 2018)
    1. Harrison P. The quest for the perfect vagina: what you should know about cosmetic genital procedures. Medscape-August 27, 2018. Available at: (Last accessed August28, 2018).
    1. Lev-Sagie A. Vulvar and vaginal atrophy: physiology, clinical presentation, and treatment considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015;58:476–491
    1. MacBride MB, Rhodes DJ, Shuster LT. Vulvovaginal atrophy. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:87–94
    1. Freedman MA. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: physical characteristics and prevalence. Poster (#P-21) presented at NAMS Annual Meeting, Orlando FL: October 2016. Available at: (Last accessed October10, 2018).
    1. Gandhi J, Chen A, Dagur G, et al. . Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: an overview of clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, etiology, evaluation, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:704–711
    1. Iosif CS, Batra S, Ek A, Astedt B. Estrogen receptors in the human female lower uninary tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:817–820
    1. Parish SJ, Nappi RE, Krychman ML, et al. . Impact of vulvovaginal health on postmenopausal women: a review of surveys on symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy. Int J Womens Health 2013;5:437–447
    1. Kingsberg SA, Wysocki S, Magnus L, Krychman ML. Vulvar and vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: findings from the REVIVE (Real Women's Views of Treatment Options for Menopausal Vaginal Changes) Survey. J Sex Med 2013;10:1790–1799
    1. Nappi RE, Kokot-Kierpa M. Vaginal Health: Insights, Views and Attitudes (VIVA)-results from and international survey. Climacteric 2012;15:36–44
    1. Simon JA, Kokot-Kierepa M, Goldstein J, Nappi RE. Vaginal health in the United States: results from the Vaginal Health: Insights, Views, & Attitudes survey. Menopause 2013;20:1043–1048
    1. Nilsson M, Lalos A, Lalos O. The impact of female urinary incontinence and urgency on quality of life and partner relationship. Neurourol Urodyn 2009;28:976–981
    1. Portman DJ, Gass MLK; Vulvovaginal Atrophy Terminology Consensus Conference Panel. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: new terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health and the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2014;21:1063–1068
    1. Rahn DD, Acevedo JF, Word RA. Effect of vaginal distention on elastic fiber synthesis and matrix degradation in the vaginal wall: potential role in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008;295:R1351–R1358
    1. Farage M, Maibach H. Lifetime changes in the vulva and vagina. Arch GYN Obstet 2006;273:195–202
    1. DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. . Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:295–302
    1. Ruiz-Zapata AM, Kerkhof MH, Ghazanfari S, et al. . Vaginal fibroblastic cells from women with pelvic organ prolapse produce matrices with increased stiffness and collagen content. Sci Rep 2016;6:22971.
    1. Liu X, Zhao Y, Pawlyk B, Damaser M, Li T. Failure of elastic fiber homeostasis leads to pelvic floor disorders. Am J Pathol 2006;168:519–528
    1. Kuhn K. In: Structure and Function of Collagen Types. Mayne R, Burgeson R. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1987. p. 2
    1. Thomas HM, Bryce CL, Ness RB, Hess R. Dyspareunia is associated with decreased frequency of intercourse in the menopausal transition. Menopause 2011;18:152–157
    1. Dennerstein L, Dudley EC, Hopper JL, Guthrie JR, Burger HG. A prospective population-based study of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:351–358
    1. Boyle R, Hay-Smith EJ, Cody JD, Morkved S. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and fecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 2014;33:269–276
    1. Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J, Habee-Seguin GM, Mercier J. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:300–308
    1. Faubion SS, Larkin LC, Stuenkel CA, et al. . Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with or at high risk for breast cancer: consensus recommendations from the North American Menopause Society and the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health. Menopause 2018;25:1–13
    1. Gaspar A, Maestri S, Silva J, et al. . Intraurethral Erbium:YAG Laser for the management of urinary symptoms of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: a pilot Study. Lasers Surg Med 2018;50:802–807
    1. Lang P, Karram M. Lasers for pelvic Floor dysfunctions: is there evidence? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2017;29:354–358
    1. Tadir Y, Gaspar A, Lev-Sagie A, et al. . Light and energy based therapeutics for Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: consensus and controversies. Lasers Surg Med 2017;49:137–159
    1. Alinsod RM. Transcutaneous temperature controlled radiofrequency for orgasmic dysfunction. Lasers Surg Med 2016;48:641–645
    1. Kwon T-R, Kim JH, Seok J, et al. . Fractional CO2 laser treatment for vaginal laxity: a preclinical study. Lasers Surg Med 2018;50:940–947
    1. Iguchi M, Littmann AE, Chang SH, Wester LA, Knipper JS, Shields RK. Heat stress and cardiovascular, hormonal, and heat shock proteins in humans. J Athl Train 2012;47:184–190
    1. JoyLux. A pilot thermographic study of vSculpt effects on the human vulva.
    1. JoyLux. vSculpt clinical study, JoyLux 1515-01 thermal testing of vSculpt in Humans, Western IRB #20160694;7/13/2016.
    1. Bashkatov AN, Genina EA, Kochubey VI, Tuchin VI. Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm. J Phys D 2005;38:2543–2555
    1. Enwemeka CS. Attenuation and penetration of visible 632.8 nm and invisible infra-red 904 nm light in soft tissues. Laser Ther 2001;13:95–101
    1. Hardy LA, Chang CH, Myers EM, Kennelly MJ, Fried NM. Computer simulations of thermal tissue remodeling during transvaginal and transurethral laser treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Lasers Surg Med 2017;49:198–205
    1. Madsen SJ, Wyss P, Svaasand LO, Haskell RC, Tadir Y, Tromberg BJ. Determination of the optical properties of the human uterus using frequency-domain photon migration and steady-state techniques. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1191–1202
    1. Patterson MS, Wilson BC, Wyman DR. The propagation of optical radiation in tissue II: optical properties of tissues and resulting fluence distributions. Lasers Med Sci 1991;6:379–390
    1. Stolik S, Delgado JA, Perez A, Anasagasti L. Measurement of the penetration depths of red and near infrared light in human “ex vivo” tissues. J Photochem Photobiol B 2000;57:90–93
    1. Tunér J, Hode L. The New Laser Therapy Handbook. Grängesberg: Prima Books, 2011; pp. 840
    1. Hopkins JT, McLodat TA, Seegmiller JG, Baxter GD. Low-Level laser therapy facilitates superficial wound healing in humans: a triple-blind, sham-controlled study. J Athl Train 2004;39:223–229
    1. Schindl A, Schindl M, Schindl L. Successful treatment of a persistent radiation ulcer by low power laser therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37:646–648
    1. Lanzafame RJ, Stadler I. Chapter 36: the recalcitrant wound: using low-level light therapy to manage non-healing wounds and ulcers. In: Handbook of Low-Level Laser Therapy. Hamblin MR, Agrawal T, De Sousa M. (eds.). Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing Pte LTD., 2017; pp. 581–596
    1. Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A. The biomedical effects of laser application. Lasers Surg Med 1985;5:31–39
    1. Lam TS, Abergel RP, Castel JC, Dwyer RM, Lesavoy MA, Uitto J. Laser stimulation of collagen synthesis in human skin fibroblast cultures. Lasers Life Sci 1986;1:61–77
    1. Conlan MJ, Rapley JW, Cobb CM. Biostimulation of wound healing by low-energy laser irradiation: a review. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:492–496
    1. Hawkins D, Houreld N, Abrahamse H. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) as an effective therapeutic modality for delayed wound healing. Ann NY Acad Sci 2005;1056:486–493
    1. Passarella S, Casamassima E, Molinari S, et al. . Increase of proton electrochemical potential and ATP synthesis in rat liver mitochondria irradiated in vitro by helium-neon laser. FEBS Lett 1984;175:95–99
    1. Stadler I, Lanzafame RJ, Evans R, et al. . 830-nm irradiation increases the wound tensile strength in a diabetic murine model. Lasers Surg Med 2001;28:220–226
    1. Morimoto Y, Arai T, Kikuchi M, Nakajima S, Nakamura H. Effect of low-intensity argon laser irradiation on mitochondrial respiration. Lasers Surg Med 1992;15:191–199
    1. Yu W, Naim JO, McGowan M, Ippolito K, Lanzafame RJ. Photomodulation of oxidative metabolism and electron chain enzymes in rat liver mitochondria. Photochem Photobiol 1997;66:866–871
    1. Karu TI. The Science of Low Power Laser Therapy. London: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1998; pp. 14–33, 53,–94, 95–121
    1. Karu TI. Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 1998;49:1–17
    1. Vladimiorv IA, Klebanov GI, Borisenko GG, Osipov AN. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the low intensity laser radiation effect. Biofizika 2004;49:339–350
    1. Eells JT, Wong-Riley MT, VerHoeve J, et al. . Mitochondrial signal transduction in accelerated wound and retinal healing by near-infrared light therapy. Mitochondrion 2004;4:559–567
    1. Silveira PC, Streck EL, Pinho RA. Evaluation of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in wound healing by low-level laser therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B 2007;86:279–282
    1. Karu TI. Low power laser therapy. In: Biomedical Photonics Handbook. Vo-Dinh T. (ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2003; pp. 48.1–25
    1. Liu TCY, Jiao JL, Xu XY, Liu XG, Deng SX, Liu SH. Photobiomodulation: phenomenology and its Mechanism. SPIE Proc 2004;5632:185–191
    1. Hamblin MR, Demidova TN. Mechanisms of low level light therapy. SPIE Proc 2006;6140:1–12
    1. Lanzafame RJ, Blanche RR, Chiacchierini RP, Kazmirek ER, Sklar JA. The growth of human scalp hair in females using visible red light laser and LED sources. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46:601–607
    1. Avci P, Gupta GK, Clark J, Wikonkal N, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46:144–151
    1. Huang YY, Chen ACH, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Dose Response 2009;7:358–383
    1. Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:516–533
    1. Meneguzzo DT, Lopes LA, Pallota R, Soares-Ferreira L, Lopes-Martins RA, Ribeiro MS. Prevention and treatment of mice paw edema by near-infrared low-level laser therapy on lymph nodes. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:973–980
    1. Wikramanayake TC, Rodriguez R, Choudhary S, et al. . Effects of the Lexington LaserComb on hair regrowth in the C3H/HeJ mouse model of alopecia areata. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:431–436
    1. Haywood RM, Wardman P, Gault DT, et al. . Ruby laser irradiation (694 nm) of human skin biopsies: assessment by electron spin resonance spectroscopy of free radical production and oxidative stress during laser depilation. Photochem Photobiol 1999;70:348–352
    1. Lanzafame RJ. Photobiomodulation: an enlightened path emerges. Photomed Laser Surg 2013;31:299–300
    1. Yu W, Naim JO, Lanzafame RJ. The effect of laser irradiation on the release of bFGF from 3T3 fibroblasts. Photochem Photobiol 1994;59:167–170
    1. Purschke M, Laubach HJ, Anderson RR, Manstein D. Thermal injury causes DNA damage and lethality in unheated surrounding cells: active thermal bystander effect. J Invest Dermatol 2010;130:86–92
    1. Purschke M, Anderson R, Zurakowski D, Manstein D. Cell-cycle-dependent active thermal bystander effect (ATBE). Lasers Surg Med 2011;43:230–235
    1. Lanzafame RJ, Brondon P, Stadler I. WOUND HEALING: experimental and clinical approaches to understanding photobiomodulation and its mechanisms. In: Lasers In Medicine And Dentistry Volume 4. Simunovic Z. (ed.). European Medical Laser Association. Zagreb, Croatia: AKD, 2009; pp. 163–172
    1. Chow R, Arwati P, Laakso L, Bjordal J, Baxter G. Inhibition and relevance to analgesic effects: a systematic review. Photomed Laser Surg 2009;29:365–381
    1. Chow RT, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RAB, Bjordal JM. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Lancet 2009;374:1897–1908
    1. Karu T. Is it time to consider photobiomodulation as a drug equivalent? Photomed Laser Surg 2013;31:188–191
    1. Lanzafame RJ, Stadler I, Coleman J, et al. . Temperature-controlled 830 nm LLLT of experimental pressure ulcers. Photomed Laser Surg 2004;22:483–488
    1. Fonseca AS, Moreira TO, Paixao DL, et al. . Effect of laser therapy on DNA damage. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42:481–488
    1. Myakishev-Rempel M, Stadler I, Brondon P, et al. . A preliminary study of the safety of red light phototherapy of tissues harboring cancer. Photomed Laser Surg 2012;30:551–558
    1. Stadler I, Evans R, Kolb B, et al. . In vitro effects of low-level laser irradiation at 660 nm on peripheral blood lymphocytes. Lasers Surg Med 2000;27:255–261
    1. Santana-Blank L, Rodríguez-Santana E, Santana Rodríguez KE. Concurrence of emerging developments in photobiomodulation and Cancer. Photomed Laser Surg 2012;30:615–616
    1. Santana-Blank L, Rodríguez-Santana E, Santana-Rodríguez JA, Santana-Rodríguez KE. Solid tumors and photobiomodulation: a novel approach to induce physiologically reparative homeostasis/homeokinesis-review. J Solid Tumors 2012;2:23–35
    1. Lanzafame RJ, Stadler I, Kurtz AF, et al. . Reciprocity of exposure time and irradiance on energy density during photoradiation on wound healing in a murine pressure ulcer model. Lasers Surg Med 2007;39:534–542
    1. Arany PR. Healing tumors with light: science Fiction or the future of medicine? Photomed Laser Surg 2018;36:227–229
    1. Hamblin MR, Nelson ST, Strahan JR. Photobiomodulation and cancer: what is the truth? Photomed Laser Surg 2018;36:241–245
    1. Bensadoun RJ, Nair RG. Low-level laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced mucositis: 2012 state of the art based on literature review and meta-analysis. Curr Opin Oncol 2012;24:363–370
    1. Thompson IOC, van der Bijl P. A comparative light microscopic, electron-microscopic and chemical study of human vaginal and buccal epithelium. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:1091–1098
    1. Zigmond E, Varol C, Kaplan M, Shapira O, Melzer E. Low-level light therapy induces mucosal healing in a murine model of dextran-sodium-sulfate induced colitis. Photomed Laser Surg 2014;32:450–457
    1. Whelan HT, Connelly JF, Hodgson BD, et al. . NASA light-emitting diodes for the prevention of oral mucositis in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002;20:319–324
    1. Hodgson BD, Margolis DM, Salzman DE, et al. . Amelioration of oral mucositis pain by NASA near-infrared light-emitting diodes in bone marrow transplant patients. Support Care Cancer 2012;20:1405–1415
    1. Freitas AC, Campos L, Brandão TB, et al. . Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: effect of LED and laser phototherapy treatment protocols. Photomed Laser Surg 2014;32:81–87
    1. Neuman I, Finkelstein Y. Narrow-band red light phototherapy in perennial allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;78:399–406
    1. Kuhn A, Porto FA, Miraglia P, Brunetto AL. Low-level infrared laser therapy in chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2009;31:33–37
    1. Franca CM, França CM, Núñez SC, et al. . Low-intensity red laser on the prevention and treatment of induced-oral mucositis in hamsters. Photochem Photobiol B 2009;94:25–31
    1. Wagner VP, Meurer L, Martins MA, et al. . Influence of different energy densities of laser phototherapy on oral wound healing. J Biomed Opt 2013;18:128002.
    1. Lee SY, Park KH, Choi JW, et al. . A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and split-face clinical study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation: clinical, profilometric, histologic, ultrastructural, and biochemical evaluations and comparison of three different treatment settings. Photochem Photobiol B 2007;88:51–67
    1. de la Torre S, Miller LE. Multimodal vaginal toning for bladder symptoms and quality of life in stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1201–1207
    1. Gaspar A, Leibaschoff GH. Preliminary study using a device for photobiomodulation and controlled exercises in the perineum floor. Presented at the World Society of Cosmetic Gynecology Congress, Cartagena, Columbia, April28, 2018
    1. Yu W, Naim JO, Lanzafame RJ. The effects of photo-stimulation on wound healing in diabetic mice. Lasers Surg Med 1997;20:56–63

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다