Steroid injections for shoulder disorders: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

G J van der Heijden, D A van der Windt, J Kleijnen, B W Koes, L M Bouter, G J van der Heijden, D A van der Windt, J Kleijnen, B W Koes, L M Bouter

Abstract

Background: Patients with shoulder disorders are believed to benefit considerably from steroid injections. However, the controversy about their efficacy persists.

Aim: The study was designed to assess the efficacy of steroid injections for shoulder disorders.

Method: A systematic computerized literature search in Medline (Index Medicus 1/1966-10/1995) and Embase (Excerpta Medica 1/1984-10/1995) was conducted, supplemented with citation tracking of all relevant publications. Studies published before November 1995 were selected if steroid injections were randomly allocated to patients with shoulder disorders and when clinically relevant outcome measures were reported. Because the validity of study outcomes depends heavily on the strength of methodological quality, the methods were assessed systematically by two 'blinded' independent reviewers. This resulted in a method score (maximum 100 points) that was based on four categories: study population, interventions, measurement of effect, and data presentation and analysis. Confidence intervals for the differences between groups in success rates were calculated in order to summarize the efficacy of steroid injections.

Results: Only three out of the 16 studies scored more than 50 points, indicating a generally poor quality of methods. Most studies reported small sample sizes. The flaws most often found were incomparability of co-interventions and poor blinding of therapist. The methods assessment was frequently hampered by incomplete information about randomization, prognostic comparability, compliance, outcome measures included, blinding of patients and blinding of outcome measurement.

Conclusions: The evidence in favour of the efficacy of steroid injections for shoulder disorders is scarce. The methods of most studies appear to be of poor quality. The few studies that appear to be credible do not provide conclusive evidence about which patients at what time in the course of shoulder disorders benefit most from steroid injections.

References

    1. Scott Med J. 1972 May;17(5):176-86
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1953 Oct;39(4):735-46
    1. Physiotherapy. 1973 Oct 10;59(10):312-5
    1. Am J Med. 1975 Mar;58(3):295-9
    1. Proc R Soc Med. 1975 Nov;68(11):731-6
    1. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1975 Nov;14(4):236
    1. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1977 Aug;7(1):21-47
    1. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1980 Aug;19(3):173-9
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Oct 17;283(6298):1005-6
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Feb;64(2):196-201
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Jul-Aug;(177):235-63
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 5;287(6402):1339-41
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984 Jun;43(3):353-60
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Sep;30(9):1040-5
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Apr;48(4):322-5
    1. Geriatrics. 1990 Apr;45(4):45-52, 55
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):121-7
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(11):1191-9
    1. J Rheumatol. 1990 Sep;17(9):1207-10
    1. BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):316-23
    1. BMJ. 1991 Jun 29;302(6792):1572-6
    1. BMJ. 1991 Nov 23;303(6813):1298-303
    1. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1992 Apr;43(2):127-30
    1. Clin Rheumatol. 1992 Mar;11(1):105-8
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Feb;43(367):73-7
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Aug;32(8):743-5
    1. BMJ. 1993 Nov 20;307(6915):1329-30
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):25-9
    1. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):101-4
    1. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):122-4
    1. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):125-8
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8):851-62
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May;48(5):691-704
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1974 Mar;33(2):116-9

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다