The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial
B Dobkin, H Barbeau, D Deforge, J Ditunno, R Elashoff, D Apple, M Basso, A Behrman, S Harkema, M Saulino, M Scott, Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial Group, B Dobkin, H Barbeau, D Deforge, J Ditunno, R Elashoff, D Apple, M Basso, A Behrman, S Harkema, M Saulino, M Scott, Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial Group
Abstract
Background: The Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) compared 12 weeks of step training with body weight support on a treadmill (BWSTT) that included overground practice to a defined but more conventional overground mobility intervention (CONT) in patients with incomplete traumatic SCI within 8 weeks of onset. No previous studies have reported walking-related outcomes during rehabilitation.
Methods: This single-blinded, randomized trial entered 107 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) C and D patients and 38 ASIA B patients with lesions between C5 and L3 who were unable to walk on admission for rehabilitation. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM-L) for walking, 15-m walking speed, and lower extremity motor score (LEMS) were collected every 2 weeks.
Results: No significant differences were found at entry and during the treatment phase (12-week mean FIM-L = 5, velocity = 0.8 m/s, LEMS = 35, distance walked in 6 min = 250 m). Combining the 2 arms, a FIM-L >or= 4 was achieved in < 10% of ASIA B patients, 92% of ASIA C patients, and all of ASIA D patients. Walking speed of >or= 0.6 m/s correlated with a LEMS near 40 or higher.
Conclusions: Few ASIA B and most ASIA C and D patients achieved functional walking ability by the end of 12 weeks of BWSTT and CONT, consistent with the primary outcome data at 6 months. Walking-related measures assessed at 2-week intervals reveal that time after SCI is an important variable for entering patients into a trial with mobility outcomes. By about 6 weeks after entry, most patients who will recover have improved their FIM-L to >3 and are improving in walking speed. Future trials may reduce the number needed to treat by entering patients with FIM-L < 4 at > 8 weeks after onset if still graded ASIA B and at > 12 weeks if still ASIA C.
Figures
References
- Dobkin B. The Clinical Science of Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
- Barbeau H, McCrea D, O’Donovan M, et al. Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function. Brain Res Rev. 1999;30:27–51.
- de Leon R, Hodgson J, Roy R, et al. Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1329–1340.
- Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:571–585.
- Dobkin B. Overview of treadmill locomotor training with partial body weight support: a neurophysiologically sound approach whose time has come for randomized clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1999;13:157–165.
- Wernig A, Muller S, Nanassy A, et al. Laufband therapy based on “Rules of Spinal Locomotion” is effective in spinal cord injured persons. Euro J Neurosci. 1995;7:823–829.
- Dobkin B, Harkema S, Requejo P, et al. Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurol Rehabil. 1995;9:183–190.
- Dietz V, Wirz M, Curt A, et al. Locomotor patterns in paraplegic patients: training effects and recovery of spinal cord function. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:380–390.
- Harkema S, Hurley S, Patel U, et al. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:797–811.
- Nymark J, DeForge D, Barbeau H, et al. Body weight support treadmill gait training in the subacute recovery phase of incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neuro Rehabil. 1998;12:119–138.
- Dietz V, Duysens J. Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review. Posture Gait. 2000;11:102–110.
- Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:153–167.
- Dobkin BH, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66:484–493.
- Dobkin BH. Short-distance walking speed and timed walking distance: redundant measures for clinical trials? Neurology. 2006;66:584–586.
- Pohl P, Perera S, Duncan P, et al. Gains in distance walking in a 3-month follow-up poststroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18:30–36.
- Burns S, Golding D, Rolle W, et al. Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1169–1172.
- Geisler F, Coleman W, Grieco G, et al. Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:S68–S86.
- Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:67–72.
- Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:306–311.
- Dobkin B, Havton L. Basic advances and new avenues in therapy of spinal cord injury. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55:255–282.
- Dobkin BH, Curt A, Guest J. Cellular transplants in China: observational study from the largest human experiment in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(1):5–13.
- Marino R, Ditunno J, Donovan W, et al. Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1391–1396.
- Dobkin BH. Rehabilitation and functional neuroimaging dose-response trajectories for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:276–282.
- Vaynman S, Gomez-Pinilla F. License to run: exercise impacts functional plasticity in the intact and injured CNS by using neurotrophins. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:283–295.
- Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, et al. Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:756–760.
- Kirshblum SC, O’Connor KC. Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1456–1466.
- Geisler F, Coleman W, Grieco G, et al. The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine. 2001;26:S87–S98.
- Steeves J, Lammertse D, Curt A, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel. Spine. 2006 in press.
- Barbeau H. Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:3–11.
- Steeves JD, Fawcett J, Tuszynski M. Report of international clinical trials workshop on spinal cord injury, February 2004. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:591–597.
- Winchester P, McColl R, Querry R, et al. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:313–324.
Source: PubMed