Effects of Galcanezumab on Health-Related Quality of Life and Disability in Patients with Previous Failure of 2-4 Migraine Preventive Medication Categories: Results from a Phase IIIb Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial (CONQUER)

Stewart J Tepper, Jessica Ailani, Janet H Ford, Russell M Nichols, Lily Q Li, Phebe Kemmer, Austin L Hand, Antje Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Stewart J Tepper, Jessica Ailani, Janet H Ford, Russell M Nichols, Lily Q Li, Phebe Kemmer, Austin L Hand, Antje Tockhorn-Heidenreich

Abstract

Background and objectives: Patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures have a significant burden on quality of life and disability. The CONQUER study evaluated the effects of galcanezumab on patient functioning, disability, and health status in episodic or chronic migraine with a previous failure of two to four migraine preventive medication categories.

Methods: Patients with two to four preventive migraine treatment category failures received galcanezumab 120 mg/month (240-mg loading dose) or placebo subcutaneously, for 3 months (double-blind period). In the 3-month open-label period, all patients received galcanezumab irrespective of the treatment received in the double-blind period. Changes in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) scores were assessed.

Results: A total of 462 patients were randomized to receive galcanezumab (N = 232) or placebo (N = 230). At month 3, improvement in the MSQ Role-Function-Restrictive score from baseline was significantly greater for galcanezumab (23.19 ± 1.34) vs placebo (10.66 ± 1.33) [p ≤ 0.0001]. Significant improvements in remaining MSQ domains and total MSQ scores were observed (p < 0.0001) during the double-blind period. MIDAS total scores were significantly (p ≤ 0.0001) reduced with galcanezumab (- 21.10 + 3.32) vs placebo (- 3.30 + 3.28). EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale scores improved for galcanezumab (3.40 + 1.31) vs placebo (- 0.09 + 1.29; p = 0.028). During the open-label period, quality of life continued to improve for galcanezumab, with patients previously assigned to placebo reaching similar results. During both study periods, similar findings were reported in subpopulations with episodic migraine and chronic migraine.

Conclusions: Galcanezumab significantly improved functioning and reduced disability in patients with episodic migraine and chronic migraine and two to four migraine preventive treatment category failures.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03559257, registration date: 6 June, 2018.

Conflict of interest statement

SJT received grants for research (no personal compensation) from Allergan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Neurolief, Novartis, Satsuma, and Zosano; served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards (honoraria) for Aeon, Align Strategies, Allergan/Abbvie, Alphasights, Amgen, Aperture Venture Partners, Aralez Pharmaceuticals Canada, Axsome Therapeutics, Becker Pharmaceutical Consulting, BioDelivery Sciences International, Biohaven, ClearView Healthcare Partners, CRG, Currax, Decision Resources, DeepBench, Eli Lilly, Equinox, ExpertConnect, GLG, Guidepoint Global, Healthcare Consultancy Group, Health Science Communications, HMP Communications, Impel, Lundbeck, M3 Global Research, Magellan Rx Management, Medicxi, Navigant Consulting, Neurolief, Nordic BioTech, Novartis, Pulmatrix, Reckner Healthcare, Relevale, SAI MedPartners, Satsuma, Slingshot Insights, Spherix Global Insights, Sudler and Hennessey, Synapse Medical Communications, Teva, Theranica, Thought Leader Select, Trinity Partners, XOC, and Zosano; received a salary from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, American Headache Society, and Thomas Jefferson University; and received CME honoraria from the American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Diamond Headache Clinic, Elsevier, Forefront Collaborative, Hamilton General Hospital, Ontario, Canada, Headache Cooperative of New England, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Inova, Medical Learning Institute Peerview, Medical Education Speakers Network, Miller Medical Communications, North American Center for CME, Physicians’ Education Resource, Rockpointe, ScientiaCME, and WebMD/Medscape. JA has received honoraria for consulting from Amgen, Abbvie, Biohaven, Eli Lilly and Company, Lundbeck, Teva, Impel, Satsuma, Theranica, Axsome, and Vorso; received stock options from CtrlM for consulting; honoraria for speaking engagements from Abbvie, Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, and Teva; provided advising and editorial services and received honoraria from Current Pain and Headache Reports, SELF, Neurology Live, and Medscape; and engaged in CME with Avent, Pri-Med, Forefront, Medscape, Clinical Care Options, Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Answers in CME , and NeurologyLive. JA’s institution has received funding for clinical trials for her work as a principal investigator from Allergan/Abbvie, Biohaven, Eli Lilly and Company, Satsuma, and Zosano. JHF, RMN, LQL, PK, and AT-H hold stocks, and are employees at Eli Lilly and Company. ALH is an employee at IQVIA.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Least-squares (LS) mean change (standard error [SE]) from baseline to month 6. (A) Role Function-Restrictive (RF-R), (B) Role Function-Preventive (RF-P), (C) Emotional Function (EF), and (D) Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 total scores. Values presented for total placebo (PBO) and total galcanezumab (GMB) populations for double-blind and open-label periods. In the open-label period, all patients were treated with GMB, including the patients who received PBO in the double-blind period. EM episodic migraine, **p < 0.0001 for comparison between total PBO and total GMB populations; #values for the GMB population in the open-label period
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline in Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) total scores at (A) month 3 and (B) month 6. In the open-label period, all patients were treated with galcanezumab (GMB), including the patients who received placebo (PBO) in the double-blind period. CM chronic migraine, EM episodic migraine, *p < 0.01; **p ≤ 0.0001; #p < 0.05 vs PBO. The error bars represent standard error
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale scores at (A) month 3 and (B) month 6. In the open-label period, all patients were treated with galcanezumab (GMB), including the patients who received placebo (PBO) in the double-blind period. CM chronic migraine, EM episodic migraine, #p < 0.05 vs PBO. The error bars represent standard error

References

    1. Martelletti P, Schwedt TJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Quintana R, Carboni V, Diener HC, et al. My Migraine Voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0946-z.
    1. Lucas CP-RP, Watson DP, Gaul C, Ramsden E, Ritter S, et al. A real‐world analysis of the burden of migraine in patients with prior treatment failure: evidence from the BECOME Study. In: 13(th) European Headache Federation Congress 2019: abstracts: May 30(th) to June 1(st) 2019. Athens, Greece. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(Suppl 1):109.
    1. Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(1):22–33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22.
    1. American Headache Society The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59(1):1–18.
    1. Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, Reuter U, Terwindt G, Mitsikostas DD, et al. Correction to: European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0972-5.
    1. Tepper SJ. CGRP and headache: a brief review. Neurol Sci. 2019;40(Suppl. 1):99–105. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03769-8.
    1. Forderreuther S, Zhang Q, Stauffer VL, Aurora SK, Lainez MJA. Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2.
    1. Ford JH, Tassorelli C, Leroux E, Wang S, Ayer D, Nichols R, et al. Changes in patient functioning and disability: results from a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating galcanezumab for chronic migraine prevention (REGAIN) Qual Life Res. 2021;30:105–115. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02623-1.
    1. Jedynak J, Eross E, Gendolla A, Rettiganti M, Stauffer VL. Shift from high-frequency to low-frequency episodic migraine in patients treated with galcanezumab: results from two global randomized clinical trials. J Headache Pain. 2021;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01222-w.
    1. Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, Costa CM, Aurilia C, Egeo G, et al. Galcanezumab for the prevention of high frequency episodic and chronic migraine in real life in Italy: a multicenter prospective cohort study (the GARLIT study) J Headache Pain. 2021;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01247-1.
    1. Ailani J, Andrews JS, Rettiganti M, Nicholson RA. Impact of galcanezumab on total pain burden: findings from phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic or chronic migraine (EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN trials) J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01190-7.
    1. Mulleners WMKB, Láinez MJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang S, et al. Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b tria. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(10):814–825. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9.
    1. . A study of galcanezumab (LY2951742) in adults with treatment-resistant migraine (CONQUER). . Accessed 25 Aug 2020.
    1. Reuter U, Lucas C, Dolezil D, Hand AL, Port MD, Nichols RM, et al. Galcanezumab in patients with multiple previous migraine preventive medication category failures: results from the open-label period of the CONQUER trial. Adv Ther. 2021;38:5465–5483. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01911-7.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202.
    1. Martin BC, Pathak DS, Sharfman MI, Adelman JU, Taylor F, Kwong WJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1) Headache. 2000;40(3):204–215. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00030.x.
    1. Jhingran P, Davis SM, LaVange LM, Miller DW, Helms RW. MSQ: Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Further investigation of the factor structure. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(6):707–717. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813060-00007.
    1. Bagley CL, Rendas-Baum R, Maglinte GA, Yang M, Varon SF, Lee J, et al. Validating migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire v2.1 in episodic and chronic migraine. Headache. 2012;52(3):409–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01997.x.
    1. Speck RM, Shalhoub H, Wyrwich KW, Yu R, Ayer DW, Ford J, et al. Psychometric validation of the role function restrictive domain of the Migraine Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Version 2.1 electronic patient-eeported outcome in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Headache. 2019;59(5):756–774. doi: 10.1111/head.13497.
    1. Speck R, Yu R, Ford J, Ayer D, Akkala S, Wyrwich K. Responder definition thresholds of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 2.1 domains for use in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. In: 26th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research. Qual Life Res. 2019 Oct;28(Suppl. 1):1–190.
    1. Speck RM, Kudrow D, Christie S, Ayer D, Ford J, Bushnell D. The migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire, role function restrictive domain: defining clinically meaningful categories of functional impairment severity (P-0226) Cephalalgia. 2021;41(1S):1–228.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl. 1):S20–S28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, Buse DC, Kawata AK, Manack A, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) Cephalalgia. 2011;31(3):301–315. doi: 10.1177/0333102410381145.
    1. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–1736. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.
    1. EuroQol G. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
    1. EuroQoL Group. EQ-5D-5L. . Accessed 3 Sep 2020.
    1. EuroQol Group. Valuation of EQ-5D. 2020. . Accessed 3 Sep 2020.
    1. Agosti R. Migraine burden of disease: from the patient's experience to a socio-economic view. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl. 1):17–32. doi: 10.1111/head.13301.
    1. Kim SY, Park SP. The role of headache chronicity among predictors contributing to quality of life in patients with migraine: a hospital-based study. J Headache Pain. 2014;2(15):68. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-68.
    1. Ruff DD, Ford JH, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Sexson M, Govindan S, Pearlman EM, et al. Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine and a history of preventive treatment failure. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(8):931–944. doi: 10.1177/0333102419847957.
    1. Ruff DD, Ford JH, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Stauffer VL, Govindan S, Aurora SK, et al. Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine and a history of preventive treatment failure: results from two global randomized clinical trials. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(4):609–618. doi: 10.1111/ene.14114.
    1. Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, Galic M, Cohen JM, Yang R, et al. Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1030–1040. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31946-4.
    1. Reuter UGP, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2280–2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다