Development and validation of a radiomics signature for clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis (CHESS1701): a prospective multicenter study

Fuquan Liu, Zhenyuan Ning, Yanna Liu, Dengxiang Liu, Jie Tian, Hongwu Luo, Weimin An, Yifei Huang, Jialiang Zou, Chuan Liu, Changchun Liu, Lei Wang, Zaiyi Liu, Ruizhao Qi, Changzeng Zuo, Qingge Zhang, Jitao Wang, Dawei Zhao, Yongli Duan, Baogang Peng, Xingshun Qi, Yuening Zhang, Yongping Yang, Jinlin Hou, Jiahong Dong, Zhiwei Li, Huiguo Ding, Yu Zhang, Xiaolong Qi, Fuquan Liu, Zhenyuan Ning, Yanna Liu, Dengxiang Liu, Jie Tian, Hongwu Luo, Weimin An, Yifei Huang, Jialiang Zou, Chuan Liu, Changchun Liu, Lei Wang, Zaiyi Liu, Ruizhao Qi, Changzeng Zuo, Qingge Zhang, Jitao Wang, Dawei Zhao, Yongli Duan, Baogang Peng, Xingshun Qi, Yuening Zhang, Yongping Yang, Jinlin Hou, Jiahong Dong, Zhiwei Li, Huiguo Ding, Yu Zhang, Xiaolong Qi

Abstract

Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is associated with an incremental risk of esophageal varices and overt clinical decompensations. However, hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement, the gold standard for defining CSPH (HVPG≥10 mm Hg) is invasive and therefore not suitable for routine clinical practice. This study aims to develop and validate a radiomics-based model as a noninvasive method for accurate detection of CSPH in cirrhosis. The prospective multicenter diagnostic trial (CHESS1701, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03138915) involved 385 patients with cirrhosis from five liver centers in China between August 2016 and September 2017. Patients who had both HVPG measurement and contrast-enhanced CT within 14 days prior to the catheterization were collected. The noninvasive radiomics model, termed rHVPG for CSPH was developed based on CT images in a training cohort consisted of 222 consecutive patients and the diagnostic performance was prospectively assessed in 163 consecutive patients in four external validation cohorts. rHVPG showed a good performance in detection of CSPH with a C-index of 0·849 (95%CI: 0·786-0·911). Application of rHVPG in four external prospective validation cohorts still gave excellent performance with the C-index of 0·889 (95%CI: 0·752-1·000, 0·800 (95%CI: 0·614-0·986), 0·917 (95%CI: 0·772-1·000), and 0·827 (95%CI: 0·618-1·000), respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intra-observer agreement were 0·92-0·99 and 0·97-0·99, respectively. A radiomics signature was developed and prospectively validated as an accurate method for noninvasive detection of CSPH in cirrhosis. The tool of rHVPG assessment can facilitate the identification of CSPH rapidly when invasive transjugular procedure is not available.

Keywords: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; Liver cirrhosis; Noninvasive; Portal hypertension; Radiomics.

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow for the radiomics process. (a) Segmentation of region of interest on CT images. (b) Extraction of both texture and non-texture features. (c) Radiomics feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. CT, computed tomography; GLCM, Gray-level co-occurence matrix; GLRLM, Gray-level run-length matrix; GLSZM, Gray-level size zone matrix; NGTDM, Neighborhood gray-level difference matrix.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram for study enrollment. ROI, region of interest. Training cohort: The 302 Hospital of PLA. Validation cohorts: Cohort 1: Beijing Shijitan Hospital; Cohort 2: The Third Xiangya Hospital; Cohort 3: Beijing Youan Hospital; Cohort 4: Xingtai People's Hospital.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radiomics feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. (a) Tuning parameter (λ) selection in LASSO model used ten-fold cross-validation via minimum criteria. Dotted vertical lines were drawn both at the optimal (left) and minimum values (right) by using minimum criteria and 1 standard error of minimum criteria. A λ value of 0.0525, with log (λ), −2·947 was chosen using ten-fold cross-validation. (b) LASSO coefficient profiles of 20,648 features. A coefficient profile plot was produced versus the log (λ) sequence. Vertical line was drawn at the value selected where optimal λ resulted in 11 nonzero coefficients.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves of the rHVPG and other noninvasive models for detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis. rHVPG, radiomics-based hepatic venous pressure gradient.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Receiver operating characteristic curves of the rHVPG for detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis in the training and validation cohorts. rHVPG, radiomics-based hepatic venous pressure gradient.

References

    1. Tsochatzis E.A., Bosch J., Burroughs A.K. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1749–1761.
    1. Garcia-Tsao G., Bosch J. Management of varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):823–832.
    1. García-Pagán J.C., Caca K., Bureau C. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(25):2370–2379.
    1. Bosch J., Abraldes J.G., Berzigotti A. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(10):573–582.
    1. Garcia-Tsao G., Abraldes J.G., Berzigotti A. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2017;65:310–335.
    1. de Franchis R., Faculty Baveno V.I. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–752.
    1. Abraldes J.G., Bureau C., Stefanescu H. Noninvasive tools and risk of clinically significant portal hypertension and varices in compensated cirrhosis: the “Anticipate” study. Hepatology. 2016;64:2173–2184.
    1. Qi X., Li Z., Huang J. Virtual portal pressure gradient from anatomic CT angiography. Gut. 2015;64:1004–1005.
    1. Qi X., Berzigotti A., Cardenas A., Sarin S.K. Emerging non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(10):708–719.
    1. Piecha F., Paech D., Sollors J. Rapid change of liver stiffness after variceal ligation and TIPS implantation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018;314(2):G179–G187.
    1. Tana M.M., Muir A.J. Diagnosing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: serum, imaging or tissue? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(1):16–18.
    1. Lim J.K., Flamm S.L., Singh S. Clinical guidelines committee of the American gastroenterological association. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the role of elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1536–1543.
    1. Iranmanesh P., Vazquez O., Terraz S. Accurate computed tomography-based portal pressure assessment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60:969–974.
    1. Castéra L., Le Bail B., Roudot-Thoraval F. Early detection in routine clinical practice of cirrhosis and oesophageal varices in chronic hepatitis C: comparison of transient elastography (FibroScan) with standard laboratory tests and non-invasive scores. J Hepatol. 2009;50(1):59–68.
    1. Wai C.T., Greenson J.K., Fontana R.J. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:518–526.
    1. Vallet-Pichard A., Mallet V., Nalpas B. FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology. 2007;46(1):32–36.
    1. Lambin P., Leijenaar R.T.H., Deist T.M. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749–762.
    1. Gillies R.J., Kinahan P.E., Hricak H. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278:563–577.
    1. Dong J., Qi X. Liver imaging in precision medicine. EBioMedicine. 2018;32:1–2.
    1. Huang Y.Q., Liang C.H., He L. Development and validation of a radiomics romogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2157–2164.
    1. Huang Y., Liu Z., He L. Radiomics signature: A potential biomarker for the prediction of disease-free survival in early-stage (I or II) non-small cell lung cancer. Radiology. 2016;281:947–957.
    1. Liu Z., Zhang X., Shi Y. Radiomics analysis for evaluation of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(23):7253–7262.
    1. Zhang B., Tian J., Dong D. Radiomics features of multiparametric MRI as novel prognostic factors in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(15):4259–4269.
    1. Groszmann R.J., Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology. 2004;39(2):280–282.
    1. Ehteshami Bejnordi B., Veta M., Johannes Van Diest P. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 2017;318:2199–2210.
    1. Esteva A., Kuprel B., Novoa R.A. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–118.
    1. Berzigotti A. Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography. J Hepatol. 2017;67:399–411.
    1. Lemoine M., Shimakawa Y., Nayagam S. The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) predicts significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic HBV infection in West Africa. Gut. 2016;65:1369–1376.
    1. Fraquelli M., Rigamonti C., Casazza G. Etiology-related determinants of liver stiffness values in chronic viral hepatitis B or C. J Hepatol. 2011;54:621–628.
    1. Qi X., Liu F., Li Z. Insufficient accuracy of computed tomography-based portal pressure assessment in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: An analysis of data from CHESS-1601 trial. J Hepatol. 2017;68(1):210–211.
    1. Shung D.L., Garcia-Tsao G. Liver capsule: portal hypertension and varices: pathogenesis, stages and management. Hepatology. 2017;65(3):1038.
    1. Gharib A.M., Han M.A.T., Meissner E.G. Magnetic resonance elastography shear wave velocity correlates with liver fibrosis and hepatic venous pressure gradient in adults with advanced liver disease. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017
    1. Smith A.D., Branch C.R., Zand K. Liver surface nodularity quantification from routine CT images as a biomarker for detection and evaluation of cirrhosis. Radiology. 2016;280(3):771–781.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다