Randomized Pharmacokinetic Study of a Highly Purified Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and of a Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Following Single Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Women

Milko Radicioni, Chiara Leuratti, Barbara Cometti, Milko Radicioni, Chiara Leuratti, Barbara Cometti

Abstract

Background and objectives: Exogenous human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) acts on the final phase of the follicle maturation. Choriomon®, a highly purified hCG formulation, is approved in many European and extra-European countries for the induction of ovulation after stimulation of follicular development. The present study compares hCG bioavailability of Choriomon® (Test product) versus a recombinant hCG preparation (Ovitrelle®; Reference product).

Methods: In this randomized, two-way cross-over study, 26 healthy women received a single dose of Choriomon® (10,000 IU) and Ovitrelle® (250 µg; 6500 IU) by subcutaneous injection. hCG was determined in serum up to 192 h post-dose. Dose-normalized peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve up to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) were calculated and compared between the two treatments.

Results: Serum hCG concentrations increased rapidly with a very similar pharmacokinetic curve for the two products. The test/reference geometric means ratio (GMR) for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ corresponded to 121.31 and 119.81%, and the upper limits of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) (130.21% and 128.51%, for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, respectively) exceeded the 125% bioequivalence threshold. Cmax GMR was 146.89%, indicating a rate of hCG absorption approximately 50% greater for the test product (90% CI 132.30-163.10). Half-life (t1/2) was very similar (36.77 ± 5.11 h and 38.63 ± 6.08 h), whereas time to achieve Cmax (tmax) significantly differed, with median values of 16 h and 24 h for Choriomon® and Ovitrelle®, respectively, (p = 0.0023).

Conclusions: The differences between Choriomon® and Ovitrelle® pharmacokinetic parameters can be ascribed to the different raw source of the products and are reflected in the approved dose regimens of the two hCG formulations. The observed lack of bioequivalence between the two compounds at the given doses is not clinically relevant, as results from Phase III studies indicated similar clinical efficacy and safety. The safety data are in line with the known safety profile of the two products.

Gov registration no: NCT03735030.

Conflict of interest statement

B.C. is an employee of IBSA Institut Biochimique S.A., M.R. and C.L. are employees of CROSS Research S.A., Switzerland, which was contracted by IBSA Institut Biochimique S.A. for the conduction of this study and received financial support for its services. The authors declare that they have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. hCG human chorionic gonadotropin, PK pharmacokinetics, Test Test product: Choriomon®, R randomization, Ref Reference product: Ovitrelle®
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (±SD) serum hCG original concentrations (IU/L) vs. time profiles. Logarithmic/linear scale (N = 24). h hours, hCG human chorionic gonadotropin, IU/L international units/litre, Test Test product: Choriomon®, Ref Reference product: Ovitrelle®

References

    1. Muyan M, Boime I. Secretion of chorionic gonadotropin from human trophoblasts. Placenta. 1997;18:237–241. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(97)80056-2.
    1. Pierce JG, Parsons TF. Glycoprotein hormones: structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:465–495. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.002341.
    1. Fournier T, Guibourdenche J, Evain-Brion D. Review: hCGs; different sources of production, different glycoforms and functions. Placenta. 2015;29:S60–S65. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.02.002.
    1. Gemzell C. Induction of ovulation with human gonadotropins. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1965;21:179–204.
    1. Wikland M, Borg J, Forsberg AS, Jakobsson AH, Svalander P, Waldenström P. Human chorionic gonadotrophin self-administered by the subcutaneous route to induce oocyte maturation in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(7):1667–1670. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136152.
    1. Stelling JR, Chapman ET, Frankfurter D, Harris DH, Oskowitz SP, Reindollar RH. Subcutaneous versus intramuscular administration of human chorionic gonadotropin during an in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(4):881–885. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04918-x.
    1. Mannaerts BM, Geurts TB, Odink J. A randomized three-way cross-over study in healthy pituitary-suppressed women to compare the bioavailability of human chorionic gonadotrophin (Pregnyl) after intramuscular and subcutaneous administration. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1461–1464. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1461.
    1. Choriomon® 5000 IU. IBSA Institut Biochimique S.A., Switzerland. . Accessed 29 Sept 2021.
    1. Ovitrelle 250 micrograms/0.5 ml prefilled syringe. Summary of product characteristics. . Accessed 29 Sept 2021.
    1. Bellavia M, de Geyter C, Streuli I, Ibecheole V, Birkhäuser MH, Cometti BPS, de Ziegler D. Randomized controlled trial comparing highly purified (HP-hCG) and recombinant (r-hCG) for triggering ovulation in ART. Gynecol Endocr. 2013;29(2):93–97. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.730577.
    1. Guidance on the investigation of bioequivalence. CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev. 1/Corr **, 20 January 2010
    1. EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009 Rev. 1 Corr. 2**. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. 21 July 2011
    1. Gronowski AM, Grenache DG. Characterization of the hCG variants recognized by different hCG immunoassays: an important step toward standardization of hCG measurements. Clin Chem. 2009;55(8):1447–1449. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.129205.
    1. Bagchus W, Wolna P, Uhl W. Single-dose pharmacokinetic study comparing the pharmacokinetics of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in healthy Japanese and Caucasian women and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin and urinary human chorionic gonadotropin in healthy Japanese women. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;17(1):52–58. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12066.
    1. Youssef MA, Abou-Setta AM, Lam WS. Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):CD003719. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003719.pub4.
    1. Chang P, Kenley S, Burns DG, Currie K, DeVane G, O'Dea L. Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) in assisted reproductive technology: results of a clinical trial comparing two doses of rhCG (Ovidrel) to urinary hCG (Profasi) for induction of final follicular maturation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01851-9.
    1. Dissanayake S. Assessing the bioequivalence of analogues of endogenous substances ('endogenous drugs'): considerations to optimize study design. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(3):238–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03585.x.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다