Anaesthesia in PROstate Biopsy Pain Obstruction Study: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Perineal Nerve Block in Controlling Pain in Patients Undergoing Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

Bi-Ming He, Rong-Bing Li, Hai-Feng Wang, Bi-Ming He, Rong-Bing Li, Hai-Feng Wang

Abstract

Introduction: Transperineal prostate biopsy is as effective as the transrectal biopsy in detecting prostate cancer and has a lower risk of infection. However, concerning the procedural pain of the transperineal route, a higher level of anaesthesia is needed, which prevents this approach from being widely used. Although several methods of local anaesthesia to relieve pain during transperineal biopsy have been described, few well-designed trials have been conducted to assess the efficacy of local anaesthesia. Methods: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study in men suspected of having prostate cancer and planning to undergo transperineal prostate biopsy. The aim of this trial is to determine whether the perineal nerve block and periprostatic block relieve pain to different extents in men undergoing transperineal biopsy. The main inclusion criteria are men aged between 18 and 80 years old, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4-20 ng/ml, or/and suspicious rectal examination findings. A sample size of 190 participants, accounting for a 10% loss, is required. All participants will be randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1 to the perineal nerve block (n = 95) and periprostatic block groups (n = 95). The primary outcome will be the level of the worst pain experienced during the transperineal prostate biopsy procedure, which will be measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS). The key secondary outcomes will include the pain severity score at 1, 6, and 24 h after prostate biopsy. Results: The primary outcome is the level of the worst pain experienced during the prostate biopsy procedure. The main secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) Post-biopsy pain severity score at 1, 6, and 24 h after the prostate biopsy; (2) Changes in blood pressure, heart rate and breathing rate during the biopsy procedure; (3) External manifestations of pain during biopsy; (4) Anaesthesia satisfaction; (5) The detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer and any prostate cancer. Conclusion: Anaesthesia in PROstate biopsy Pain Obstruction Study (APROPOS) is randomised controlled trial aiming to determine the efficacy of the perineal nerve block in controlling pain in patients undergoing prostate biopsy via the transperineal approach. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04501055.

Keywords: pain; perineal nerve block; prostate biopsy; randomised controlled trial (RCT); transperineal.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 He, Li and Wang.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of the location of the perineal nerve block: The 2 grey dots are the block sites.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The biplanar transrectal ultrasound image. (A) Perineal nerve block. (B) Periprostatic block: prostate (red arrow); pubis (yellow arrow); seminal vesicle (green arrow); anaesthesia needle (blue arrow); perineal nerve block site (orange dot); periprostatic site (purple dot).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Form 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Form 2.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Form 3.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, Li YZ, Yang J, Li YT, et al. . The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. (2012) 14:310–5. 10.1038/aja.2011.130
    1. Xue J, Qin Z, Cai H, Zhang C, Li X, Xu W, et al. . Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:23322–36. 10.18632/oncotarget.15056
    1. Marra G, Ploussard G, Futterer J, Valerio M, Party E-YPCW. Controversies in MR targeted biopsy: alone or combined, cognitive versus software-based fusion, transrectal versus transperineal approach? World J Urol. (2019) 37:277–87. 10.1007/s00345-018-02622-5
    1. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. (2019) 17:31. 10.1186/s12957-019-1573-0
    1. Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M, Moon DA, et al. . Sepsis and ‘superbugs’: should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int. (2014) 114:384–8. 10.1111/bju.12536
    1. Iremashvili VV, Chepurov AK, Kobaladze KM, Gamidov SI. Periprostatic local anesthesia with pudendal block for transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized trial. Urology. (2010) 75:1023–7. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.083
    1. Knobloch Rv, Weber J, Varga Z, Feiber H, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R. Bilateral fine-needle administered local anaesthetic nerve block for pain. Eur Urol. (2002) 41:508–14. 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00072-6
    1. Kubo Y, Kawakami S, Numao N, Takazawa R, Fujii Y, Masuda H, et al. . Simple and effective local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy: application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy. Int J Urol. (2009) 16:420–3. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02269.x
    1. Kum F, Elhage O, Maliyil J, Wong K, Faure Walker N, Kulkarni M, et al. . Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting. BJU Int. (2020) 125:244–52. 10.1111/bju.14620
    1. Mottet N, Cornford P, Bergh RCNvd, Briers E, Santis MD, Fanti S, et al. . EAU Guidelines-2020. Amsterdam: Elsevier; (2020).
    1. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol. (1996) 155:607–9. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66464-4
    1. Wang H, Lin H, He B, Guo X, Zhou Y, Xi P, et al. . A novel perineal nerve block approach for transperineal prostate biopsy: an anatomical analysis-based randomized single-blind controlled trial. Urology. (2020) 146:25–31. 10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.058
    1. He BM, Chen R, Shi ZK, Xiao GA, Li HS, Lin HZ, et al. . Trans-perineal template-guided mapping biopsy vs. freehand trans-perineal biopsy in Chinese patients with PSA <20 ng/ml: similar cancer detection rate but different lesion detection rate. Front Oncol. (2019) 9:758. 10.3389/fonc.2019.00758
    1. Wang HF, Chen R, He BM, Qu M, Wang Y, Lin HZ, et al. . Initial experience with a novel method for cognitive transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy. Asian J Androl. (2020) 22:432–6. 10.4103/aja.aja_83_19
    1. Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. . Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. (2019) 76:340–51. 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033
    1. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, et al. . The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. (2016) 40:244–52. 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530
    1. Pepe P, Aragona F. Morbidity after transperineal prostate biopsy in 3000 patients undergoing 12 vs. 18 vs. more than 24 needle cores. Urology. (2013) 81:1142–6. 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.019
    1. Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo GD, Galia A, Fraggetta F, Pennisi M. Is it time to perform only magnetic resonance imaging targeted cores? Our experience with 1,032 men who underwent prostate biopsy. J Urol. (2018) 200:774–8. 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.061

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다