A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room

Reza Akhondzadeh, Ali Ghomeishi, Sholeh Nesioonpour, Sanaz Nourizade, Reza Akhondzadeh, Ali Ghomeishi, Sholeh Nesioonpour, Sanaz Nourizade

Abstract

Background: The efficient and secure techniques of anesthesia and sedation have always been needed for. One of these procedures is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), due to its painfulness and long duration, has high sensitivity. We compare the effects of propofol-fentanyl (PF) with propofol-ketamine (PK) to sedate patients undergoing ERCP.

Methods: In this clinical trial, patients were divided into two groups of 49 people. A group received a pharmaceutical combination of PK, and another group received a pharmaceutical combination of PF. Vital signs of patients, Ramsey Sedation Score, and pain of patients were assessed. The total dosage of used propofol was also recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference seen in the patients' hemodynamic characteristics in both groups. Pain at the end of surgery and an hour after it in the PK group was less that was not statistically significant. By Ramsey Sedation Score also significant differences were not seen between groups (p = 0.68). By using total dose of propofol used also a significant difference was not observed between the two groups (p = 0.36). Rate of apnea in PK group was 32% and in the PF group was 63%, which this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: A comparison between the two drugs combination shows that although in terms of hemodynamic and sedation criteria both groups were similar, but because of the lower amount of pain and apnea in the PK group, this combination may generally in the ERCP procedure is more efficient and safer.

Keywords: Deep sedation; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Fentanyl; Ketamine; Propofol.

Copyright © 2016 Chang Gung University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Akin A., Esmaoglu A., Tosun Z., Gulcu N., Aydogan H., Boyaci A. Comparison of propofol with propofol–ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing auditory brainstem response testing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:1541–1545.
    1. Krauss B., Green S.M. Sedation and analgesia for procedures in children. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:938–945.
    1. Joo J.D., In J.H., Kim D.W., Jung H.S., Kang J.H., Yeom J.H. The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;63:431–435.
    1. Akcaboy Z.N., Akcaboy E.Y., Albayrak D., Altinoren B., Dikmen B., Gogus N. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:736–741.
    1. Lichtenbelt B.J., Mertens M., Vuyk J. Strategies to optimise propofol-opioid anaesthesia. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:577–593.
    1. Disma N., Astuto M., Rizzo G., Rosano G., Naso P., Aprile G. Propofol sedation with fentanyl or midazolam during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:848–852.
    1. Moerman A.T., Struys M.M., Vereecke H.E., Herregods L.L., De Vos M.M., Mortier E.P. Remifentanil used to supplement propofol does not improve quality of sedation during spontaneous respiration. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16:237–243.
    1. Koo S.W., Cho S.J., Kim Y.K., Ham K.D., Hwang J.H. Small-dose ketamine reduces the pain of propofol injection. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1444–1447.
    1. Akhondzadeh R., Runassi N. Evaluation of analgesic effect of the ketamine on pain injection of propofol in patients undergoing general anesthesia. 2014;3:72–75.
    1. Akhondzade R., Pipelzade M.R., Gousheh M.R., Sarrafan N., Mahmoodi K. Comparison of the analgesic effect of intra-articular and extra-articular injection of morphine and ketamine compound in arthrotomy lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30:942–945.
    1. Li L., Chen H.Z., Long B., Meng L.X. Preventive function of remifentanil to propofol injection pain. Pract Pharm Clin Remedies. 2009;12:175.
    1. Friedberg B.L. Propofol–ketamine technique: dissociative anesthesia for office surgery (a 5-year review of 1264 cases) Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23:70–75.
    1. Hui T.W., Short T.G., Hong W., Suen T., Gin T., Plummer J. Additive interactions between propofol and ketamine when used for anesthesia induction in female patients. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:641–648.
    1. Khutia S.K., Mandal M.C., Das S., Basu S.R. Intravenous infusion of ketamine–propofol can be an alternative to intravenous infusion of fentanyl–propofol for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing emergency short surgical procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56:145–150.
    1. Andolfatto G., Abu-Laban R.B., Zed P.J., Staniforth S.M., Stackhouse S., Moadebi S. Ketamine–propofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:504–512.
    1. David H., Shipp J. A randomized controlled trial of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:435–441.
    1. Phillips W., Anderson A., Rosengreen M., Johnson J., Halpin J. Propofol versus propofol/ketamine for brief painful procedures in the emergency department: clinical and bispectral index scale comparison. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010;24:349–355.
    1. Shah A., Mosdossy G., McLeod S., Lehnhardt K., Peddle M., Rieder M. A blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate ketamine/propofol versus ketamine alone for procedural sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:425–433. e2.
    1. Nesioonpour S., Mokmeli S., Vojdani S., Mohtadi A., Akhondzadeh R., Behaeen K. The effect of low-level laser on postoperative pain after tibial fracture surgery: a double-blind controlled randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4:e17350.
    1. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C., Wong R.C., Ferrari A.P., Jr., Montes H. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652–656.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다