Study on safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the protocol of the CLASS02-01 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Xiangqian Su, Ziyu Li, Peiwu Yu, Hua Huang, Changming Huang, Jianxin Ye, Yong Li, Jian Suo, Jiren Yu, Guoxin Li, Zekuan Xu, Gang Zhao, Hui Cao, Jiankun Hu, Xiaohui Du, Fenglin Liu, Yihong Sun, Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Xiangqian Su, Ziyu Li, Peiwu Yu, Hua Huang, Changming Huang, Jianxin Ye, Yong Li, Jian Suo, Jiren Yu, Guoxin Li, Zekuan Xu, Gang Zhao, Hui Cao, Jiankun Hu, Xiaohui Du, Fenglin Liu, Yihong Sun, Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group

Abstract

Background: The safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer remains lack of clinical evidence. The Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group recently launched a multicenter randomized clinical trial (CLASS02-01) to compare the safety of LTG for clinical stage I gastric cancer with the conventional open total gastrectomy (OTG).

Methods: This CLASS02-01 trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, and non-inferiority trial. Two hundred patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not accord with the exclusion criteria will be randomly divided into LTG group (n = 100) and OTG group (n = 100). The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the early operative morbidity and mortality of LTG compared with OTG for clinical stage I gastric adenocarcinoma. The second purpose is to evaluate the recovery course and compare the postoperative hospital stay of the patients enrolled in this study.

Discussion: This CLASS02-01 trial is the first prospective randomized two-arm controlled study to determine the safety of LTG compared with OTG. Through this trial, we hope to show that experienced surgeons can safely perform LTG with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03007550 . December 30, 2016.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; Randomized controlled trial; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before enrollment of first patient, this study was approved from the institutional review boards of all research centers (14 tertiary hospitals) in China, including Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (B2016-160R), Beijing Cancer Hospital, Southwest Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Guangdong General Hospital, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University, Nangfang Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Renji Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Chinese PLA General Hospital. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients for the acquisition and use of anonymized clinical data before they are recruited.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study schema

References

    1. Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, Haustermans K, Prenen H. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2654–2664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-3.
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338.
    1. Nakamura K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, et al. A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric Cancer (JCOG0912) Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(3):324–327. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys220.
    1. Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901) World J Surg. 2015;39(11):2734–2741. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z.
    1. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial) Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):417–420. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
    1. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric Cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01) Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):28–35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.
    1. Hur H, Lee HY, Lee HJ, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:355. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1365-z.
    1. Kim HI, Hur H, Kim YN, et al. Standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and surgical quality control (KLASS-02-QC): a prospective, observational, multicenter study [NCT01283893] BMC Cancer. 2014;14:209. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-209.
    1. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01) J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84(2):123–130. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.2.123.
    1. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric Cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1350–1357. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215.
    1. Katai H. Current status of a randomized controlled trial examining laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(2):125–129. doi: 10.1111/ases.12171.
    1. Byun C, Han SU. Current status of randomized controlled trials for laparoscopic gastric surgery for gastric cancer in Korea. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(2):130–138. doi: 10.1111/ases.12176.
    1. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(7):627–633. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551.
    1. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg. 2011;98(2):255–260. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7310.
    1. Liu K, Yang K, Zhang W, et al. Changes of Esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal reflux disease among surgical patients during 1988-2012: a single-institution, high-volume experience in China. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):88–95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001148.
    1. Piessen G, Triboulet JP, Mariette C. Reconstruction after gastrectomy: which technique is best? J Visc Surg. 2010;147(5):e273–e283. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.09.004.
    1. Chin AC, Espat NJ. Total gastrectomy: options for the restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(5):271–276. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01073-8.
    1. Huang CM, Zhang JR, Zheng CH, et al. A 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108480.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다