Accuracy of D-dimer:fibrinogen ratio to diagnose pulmonary thromboembolism in patients admitted to intensive care units

Shokoufeh Hajsadeghi, Scott R Kerman, Mojtaba Khojandi, Helen Vaferi, Roza Ramezani, Negar M Jourshari, Sayyed A J Mousavi, Hamidezar Pouraliakbar, Shokoufeh Hajsadeghi, Scott R Kerman, Mojtaba Khojandi, Helen Vaferi, Roza Ramezani, Negar M Jourshari, Sayyed A J Mousavi, Hamidezar Pouraliakbar

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) may increase D-dimer and decrease fibrinogen levels. However, in settings such as intensive care units (ICU) and in long-term hospitalised patients, several factors may influence D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations and make them unreliable indicators for the diagnosis of PTE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of D-dimer:fibrinogen ratio (DDFR) for the diagnosis of PTE in ICU patients.

Methods: ICU patients who were suspected of having a first PTE and had no history of using anti-coagulants and contraceptives were included in the study. Levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen were measured for each patient prior to any intervention. Angiography or CT angiography was done in order to establish a definite diagnosis for each patient. Suitable analytical tests were performed to compare means.

Results: Eighty-one patients were included in the study, of whom 41 had PTE and 40 did not. Mean values of D-dimer and fibrinogen were 3.97 ± 3.22 µg/ml and 560.6 ± 197.3 mg/dl, respectively. Significantly higher levels of D-dimer (4.65 ± 3.46 vs 2.25 ± 2.55 µg/ml, p = 0.006) and DDFR (0.913 ± 0.716 vs 483 ± 0.440 × 10-(3), p = 0.003) were seen in PTE patients than in those without PTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed a 70.3% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity with a D-dimer value of 2.43 µg/ml (AUC = 0.714, p = 0.002) as the best cut-off point; and a 70.3% sensitivity and 61.6% specificity with a DDFR value of 0.417 × 10-(3) (AUC = 0.710, p = 0.004) as the best cut-off point. In backward stepwise regression analysis, DDRF (OR = 0.72, p = 0.025), gender (OR = 0.76, p = 0.049) and white blood cell count (OR = 1.11, p = 0.373) were modelled (p = 0.029, R(2) = 0.577).

Conclusion: For diagnosis of PTE, DDFR can be considered to have almost the same importance as D-dimer level. Moreover, it was possible to rule out PTE with only a D-dimer cut-off value < 0.43 mg/dl, without the use of DDFR. However, these values cannot be used as a replacement for angiography or CT angiography.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
ROC curve for D-dimer and DDFR to diagnose PTE by different cut-off points; compare with Table 3..

References

    1. Janata K, Holzer M, Domanovits H. et al. Mortality of patients with pulmonary embolism. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002;114(17–18):766–772.
    1. Mühl D, Füredi R, Gecse K. et al. Time course of platelet aggregation during thrombolytic treatment of massive pulmonary embolism. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007;18(7):661–667.
    1. Bick RL. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: a review of etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management: guidelines for care. Appl Thromb Hemost. 2002;8(1):1–31.
    1. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):98–107.
    1. Schluger N, Henschke C, King T. et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism at a large teaching hospital. Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging. N Engl J Med. 1994;1998;9339(3)(2):180–4. 93–104.
    1. Le Gal G, Righini M, Parent F, van Strijen M, Couturaud F. Diagnosis and management of subsegmental pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(4):724–731.
    1. Perrier A. Noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 1998;33(9):47–50. 53–55.
    1. Righini M, Nendaz M, Le Gal G, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(9):1869–1877.
    1. Kucher N, Kohler HP, Dornhöfer T, Wallmann D, Lämmle B. Accuracy of D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio to predict pulmonary embolism: a prospective diagnostic study. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(4):708–713.
    1. Boneu B, Bes G, Pelzer H, Sié P, Boccalon H. D-Dimers, thrombin antithrombin III complexes and prothrombin fragments 1+2: diagnostic value in clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1991;65(1):28–31.
    1. Adam SS, Key NS, Greenberg CS. D-dimer antigen: current concepts and future prospects. Blood. 2009;113(13):2878–2887.
    1. Lippi G, Cervellin G, Franchini M, Favaloro EJ. Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010;30(4):459–471.
    1. Heim SW, Schectman JM, Siadaty MS, Philbrick JT. D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis. Clin Chem. 2004;50(7):1136–1147.
    1. Tataru MC, Schulte H, von Eckardstein A, Heinrich J, Assmann G, Koehler E. Plasma fibrinogen in relation to the severity of arteriosclerosis in patients with stable angina pectoris after myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2001;12(3):157–165.
    1. Palumbo JS, Kombrinck KW, Drew AF. et al. Fibrinogen is an important determinant of the metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells. Blood. 2000;96(10):3302–3309.
    1. Carlson KS, DeSancho MT. Hematological issues in critically ill patients with cancer. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26(1):107–132.
    1. Eng CW, Wansaicheong G, Goh SK, Earnest A, Sum C. Exclusion of acute pulmonary embolism: computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or D-dimer? Singapore Med J. 2009;50(4):403–406.
    1. Pattynama PM. Meaning of a helical CT angiogram negative for pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 2001;218(3):913–916.
    1. Mackie IJ, Kitchen S, Machin SJ, Lowe GD. et al. Guidelines on fibrinogen assays. Br J Haematol. 2003;121(3):396–404.
    1. Rodger MA, Carrier M, Jones GN. et al. Diagnostic value of arterial blood gas measurement in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(6):2105–2108.
    1. Bircan A, Karadeniz N, Ozden A. et al. A simple clinical model composed of ECG, shock index, and arterial blood gas analysis for predicting severe pulmonary embolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2009 [E-pub ahead of print]
    1. Everse SJ, Spraggon G, Veerapandian L, Riley M, Doolittle RF. Crystal structure of fragment double-D from human fibrin with two different bound ligands. Biochemistry. 1998;37(24):8637–8642.
    1. Palla A, Pazzagli M, Manganelli D, Carmassi F, Giuntini C. Clinical, anamnestic and coagulation data in patients with suspected or confirmed pulmonary embolism. Respiration. 1994;61(2):93–98.
    1. Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ. et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353(9148):190–195.
    1. Elias A, Cazanave G, Nguyen F, Elias M, Bongard V, Cambus JP. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of three soluble fibrin monomer tests and a D-dimer assay in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs. Haematologica. 2004;89(4):499–501.
    1. Calvo-Romero JM. Accuracy of D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio to predict pulmonary embolism: a prospective diagnostic study – a rebuttal. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(10):1862–1863. 1863–1864. author’s reply.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다