Survival predictors of 177Lu-Dotatate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETS)

Mina M Swiha, Duncan E K Sutherland, Golmehr Sistani, Alireza Khatami, Rami M Abazid, Amol Mujoomdar, Daniele P Wiseman, Jonathan G Romsa, Robert H Reid, David T Laidley, Mina M Swiha, Duncan E K Sutherland, Golmehr Sistani, Alireza Khatami, Rami M Abazid, Amol Mujoomdar, Daniele P Wiseman, Jonathan G Romsa, Robert H Reid, David T Laidley

Abstract

Purpose: 177Lu-Dotatate is an emerging treatment modality for patients with unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated NETs. This study examines survival predictors in patients who received 177Lu-Dotatate.

Methods: A retrospective single-center review was conducted, examining 47 individuals with progressive well-differentiated NETs treated with 177Lu-Dotatate (four induction cycles of 5.5 GBq at 10-week intervals followed by eight maintenance cycles of 3.7 GBq at 6-month intervals).

Results: Median follow-up was 63.1 months with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 34.1 months. However, median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. The presence of ≥ 5 bone metastases (hazard ratio HR 4.33; p = 0.015), non-gastroenteropancreatic (non-GEP) NETs (HR 3.22; p = 0.025) and development of interim ascites (HR 3.15; p = 0.047) independently predicted a worse OS. Patients with chromogranin A of ≥ 4 × upper limit of normal (ULN) had shorter OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.004). Similarly, those with pre-existing ascites demonstrated a worse OS (p = 0.009) and PFS (p = 0.026). Liver metastases involving greater than 50% liver volume and the existence of unusual metastatic locations had a negative impact on OS (p = 0.033) and PFS (p = 0.026), respectively.

Conclusion: High burden of skeletal and hepatic metastases, non-GEP-NETs, chromogranin A of ≥ 4 × ULN, unusual metastatic sites, pre-existing and interim ascites are predictors of poor outcomes in patients treated with 177Lu-Dotatate. These common indicators can be used for the risk stratification and identification of patients most likely to benefit from PRRT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02236910, Retrospectively registered on September, 2014.

Keywords: Lu-Dotatate; Neuroendocrine; PRRT; Prognostic factors; Survival predictors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for OS: a the median OS for the study group had not been reached. b OS by chromogranin A; there was a significant difference in the OS between patients with chromogranin A of ≥ 4 × ULN and those with chromogranin A of < 4 × ULN (p < 0.001). c OS survival by burden of liver metastases; there was a significant difference in the OS between patients with liver metastases of > 50% liver volume compared to those with ≤ 50% liver volume (p = 0.033). d OS by pre-existing ascites; patients with pre-existing ascites prior PRRT initiation had a shorter OS compared to those without pre-existing ascites (p = 0.009)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curves for OS: a OS by number of bone metastases; there was a significantly shorter OS in patients with (≥ 5) bone deposits compared to patients with (0–4) bone deposits (p = 0.028). b OS by primary tumor site; a longer OS was observed in patients with GEP-NETs vs non-GEP-NETs (p = 0.011). c OS by interim ascites; patients who developed ascites during the period of treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate or after its cessation had a shorter OS (p = 0.026)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS: a the median PFS of the study group was 34.1 months; b PFS by Chromogranin A; there was a significant difference in the PFS between patients with chromogranin A of ≥ 4 × ULN compared to those with chromogranin A of < 4 × ULN (p = 0.004); c PFS by presence of uncommon sites of metastases; patients with uncommon/unusual metastatic sites had a poor PFS (p = 0.026); d PFS by pre-existing ascites; patients with pre-existing ascites prior PRRT initiation had a shorter PFS compared to those without pre-existing ascites (p = 0.026)

References

    1. Abou Jokh Casas E, Pubul Núñez V, Anido-Herranz U, et al. Evaluation of 177Lu-Dotatate treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(13):1513–1524. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i13.1513.
    1. Bergestuen DS, Aabakken L, Holm K, et al. Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: prognostic factors and survival. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(9):1084–1091. doi: 10.1080/00365520903082432.
    1. Bodei L, Schöder H, Baum RP, et al. Molecular profiling of neuroendocrine tumours to predict response and toxicity to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(9):e431–e443. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30323-5.
    1. Caplin ME, Pavel M, Ćwikła JB, et al. Anti-tumour effects of lanreotide for pancreatic and intestinal neuroendocrine tumours: the CLARINET open-label extension study. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(3):191–199. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0490.
    1. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):1335–1342. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589.
    1. Ezziddin S, Attassi M, Yong-Hing CJ, et al. Predictors of long-term outcome in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-octreotate. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(2):183–190. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.125336.
    1. Frilling A, Sotiropoulos GC, Li J, et al. Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases. HPB (oxford) 2010;12(6):361–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00175.x.
    1. Galvano A, Peri M, Guarini AA, et al. Analysis of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: prognostic and predictive significance of NLR, LDH, ALI, and LIPI score. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920942378. doi: 10.1177/1758835920942378.
    1. Garcia-Carbonero R, Capdevila J, Crespo-Herrero G, et al. Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the National Cancer Registry of Spain (RGETNE) Ann Oncol. 2010;21(9):1794–1803. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq022.
    1. Kavecansky J, Wei L, Caronia L, et al. Bone metastases in well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a single institutional review from the Ohio State University Medical Center. Pancreas. 2015;44(2):198–203. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000267.
    1. Kwekkeboom DJ, Mueller-Brand J, Paganelli G, et al. Overview of results of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 3 radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(Suppl 1):62S–S66.
    1. Laskaratos FM, Walker M, Wilkins D, et al. Evaluation of clinical prognostic factors and further delineation of the effect of mesenteric fibrosis on survival in advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2018;107(3):292–304. doi: 10.1159/000493317.
    1. Millburn N (2018) Lutetium 177Lu-Dotatate (insert package). In: advanced accelerator applications USA, Inc. U.S. National library of medicine. . Accessed 09 Aug 2018
    1. Modlin IM, Moss SF, Oberg K, et al. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumours: current diagnosis and management. Med J Aust. 2010;193(1):46–52. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03742.x.
    1. Naswa N, Sharma P, Kumar R, et al. Usual and unusual neuroendocrine tumor metastases on (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT: a pictorial review. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(6):e239–e245. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318252d2c3.
    1. Oronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, et al. Nothing but NET: a review of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas. Neoplasia. 2017;19(12):991–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.09.002.
    1. Pasieka JL, McKinnon JG, Kinnear S, et al. Carcinoid syndrome symposium on treatment modalities for gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours: symposium summary. Can J Surg. 2001;44(1):25–32.
    1. Petrelli F, Cabiddu M, Coinu A, et al. Prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 76 studies. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(7):961–970. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1043026.
    1. Rinke A, Müller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4656–4663. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8510.
    1. Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, et al. Prospective study of 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and unknown primary sites. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):588–596. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0987.
    1. Sistani G, Sutherland DEK, Mujoomdar A, et al. Efficacy of 177Lu-Dotatate induction and maintenance therapy of various types of neuroendocrine tumors: a phase ii registry study. Curr Oncol. 2020;28(1):115–127. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010015.
    1. Smith-Palmer J, Leeuwenkamp OR, Virk J, et al. Lutetium oxodotreotide (177Lu-Dotatate) for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic progressive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Scotland. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07710-7.
    1. Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):152–160. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds276.
    1. Srirajaskanthan R, Desai K, Jayaratnam A, et al. Uncommon sites for metastasis of neuroendocrine tumor in adults. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15):e15683–e15683. doi: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e15683.
    1. Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, et al. Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):125–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607427.
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–216. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
    1. Vaughan E, Machta J, Walker M, et al. Retreatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with progressing neuroendocrine tumours: efficacy and prognostic factors for response. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1091):20180041. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180041.
    1. Warner RR, Curran T, Shafir MK, et al. Serum and ascites chromogranin-A in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2011;40(4):622–626. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182156c0b.
    1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):3063–3072. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377.
    1. Yao JC, Pavel M, Phan AT, et al. Chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase as prognostic markers in patients with advanced pNET treated with everolimus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3741–3749. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0666.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다