PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer

Gordon C Wishart, Elizabeth M Azzato, David C Greenberg, Jem Rashbass, Olive Kearins, Gill Lawrence, Carlos Caldas, Paul D P Pharoah, Gordon C Wishart, Elizabeth M Azzato, David C Greenberg, Jem Rashbass, Olive Kearins, Gill Lawrence, Carlos Caldas, Paul D P Pharoah

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prognostication model to predict overall and breast cancer specific survival for women treated for early breast cancer in the UK.

Methods: Using the Eastern Cancer Registration and Information Centre (ECRIC) dataset, information was collated for 5,694 women who had surgery for invasive breast cancer in East Anglia from 1999 to 2003. Breast cancer mortality models for oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER negative tumours were derived from these data using Cox proportional hazards, adjusting for prognostic factors and mode of cancer detection (symptomatic versus screen-detected). An external dataset of 5,468 patients from the West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit (WMCIU) was used for validation.

Results: Differences in overall actual and predicted mortality were <1% at eight years for ECRIC (18.9% vs. 19.0%) and WMCIU (17.5% vs. 18.3%) with area under receiver-operator-characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.81 and 0.79 respectively. Differences in breast cancer specific actual and predicted mortality were <1% at eight years for ECRIC (12.9% vs. 13.5%) and <1.5% at eight years for WMCIU (12.2% vs. 13.6%) with AUC of 0.84 and 0.82 respectively. Model calibration was good for both ER positive and negative models although the ER positive model provided better discrimination (AUC 0.82) than ER negative (AUC 0.75).

Conclusions: We have developed a prognostication model for early breast cancer based on UK cancer registry data that predicts breast cancer survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer and includes mode of detection for the first time. The model is well calibrated, provides a high degree of discrimination and has been validated in a second UK patient cohort.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operator characteristic curves for breast cancer specific mortality by Oestrogen Receptor status in Eastern Cancer Registration and Information Centre and West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit cohorts. A) ER positive at five years, B) ER negative at five years, C) ER positive at eight years, D) ER negative at eight years. Solid line ECRIC data; dashed line WMCIU data.

References

    1. Haybittle JL, Blamey RW, Elston CW, Johnson J, Doyle PJ, Campbell FC. A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1982;45:361–366.
    1. Todd JH, Dowle C, Williams MR, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Hinton CP, Blamey RW, Haybittle JL. Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1987;56:489–492.
    1. D'Eredita G, Giardina C, Martellotta M, Natale T, Ferrarese F. Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long term follow-up that were treated in a single institution. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:591–596. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00435-4.
    1. Blamey RW, Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Lee AH, Macmillan RD, Morgan DA, Robertson JF, Mitchell MJ, Ball GR, Haybitle JL, Elston CW. Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1548–1555. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.016.
    1. Blamey RW, Pinder SE, Ball GR, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Mitchell MJ, Haybittle J. Reading the prognosis of the individual with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1545–1547. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.017.
    1. Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ, Mercer MB, Hewlett J, Gerson N, Parker HL. Computer Program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:980–991.
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: An overview of randomized trials. Lancet. 1998;351:1451–1467. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11423-4.
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: An overview of randomized trials. Lancet. 1998;352:930–942. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03301-7.
    1. Olivoto IA, Bajdik CD, Ravdin PM, Speers CH, Coldman AJ, Norris BD, Davis GJ, Chia SK, Gelmon KA. Population-based validation of the prognostic model Adjuvant! for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2716–2725. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.178.
    1. Campbell HE, Taylor MA, Harris AL, Gray AM. An investigation into the performance of the Adjuvant! Online prognostic programme in early breast cancer for a cohort of patients in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1074–1084. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605283.
    1. Azzato EM, Greenberg D, Shah M, Blows F, Driver KE, Caporaso NE, Pharoah PDP. Prevalent cases in observational studies of cancer survival: do they bias hazard ratio estimates? BJC. 2009;100:1806–1811.
    1. May S, Hosmer DW. A simplified method of calculating an overall goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model. Lifetime Data Analysis. 1998;4:109–120. doi: 10.1023/A:1009612305785.
    1. Joensuu H, Lehtimaki T, Holli K, Elomaa L, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Kataja V, Anttila A, Lundin M, Isola J, Lundin J. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA. 2004;292:1064–1073. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.9.1064.
    1. Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1195–1203.
    1. Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD, Chou P, Brown CH, Purushotham AD, Duffy SW. Screen-detected versus symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone? Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1741–1744. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604368.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다