eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients' and Health Care Providers' Use of Health-Related Internet Information

Anne Townsend, Jenny Leese, Paul Adam, Michael McDonald, Linda C Li, Sheila Kerr, Catherine L Backman, Anne Townsend, Jenny Leese, Paul Adam, Michael McDonald, Linda C Li, Sheila Kerr, Catherine L Backman

Abstract

Background: The rapid explosion in online digital health resources is seen as transformational, accelerating the shift from traditionally passive patients to patients as partners and altering the patient-health care professional (HCP) relationship. Patients with chronic conditions are increasingly engaged, enabled, and empowered to be partners in their care and encouraged to take responsibility for managing their conditions with HCP support.

Objective: In this paper, we focus on patients' and HCPs' use of health-related Internet information and how it influences the patient-HCP relationship. In particular, we examine the challenges emerging in medical encounters as roles and relationships shift and apply a conceptual framework of relational ethics to examine explicit and nuanced ethical dimensions emerging in patient-HCP interactions as both parties make increased use of health-related Internet information.

Methods: We purposively sampled patients and HCPs in British Columbia, Canada, to participate in focus groups. To be eligible, patients self-reported a diagnosis of arthritis and at least one other chronic health condition; HCPs reported a caseload with >25% of patients with arthritis and multimorbidity. We used a semistructured, but flexible, discussion guide. All discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Elements of grounded theory guided our constant comparison thematic analytic approach. Analysis was iterative. A relational ethics conceptual lens was applied to the data.

Results: We recruited 32 participants (18 patients, 14 HCPs). They attended seven focus groups: four with patients and three with rehabilitation professionals and physicians. Predominant themes to emerge were how use of health-related Internet information fostered (1) changing roles, (2) patient-HCP partnerships, and (3) tensions and burdens for patients and HCPs.

Conclusions: Relational aspects such as mutual trust, uncertainty, and vulnerability are illuminated in patient-HCP interactions around health-related Internet information and the negotiated space of clinical encounters. New roles and associated responsibilities have key ethical dimensions that make clear the changes are fundamental and important to understand in ethical care. When faced with tensions and burdens around incorporating health-related Internet information as a resource in clinical encounters, participants described a particular ambivalence illustrating the fundamental changes being negotiated by both patients and HCPs.

Keywords: arthritis; chronic illness; e-health; health-related Internet information; patient-HCP relationship; qualitative; relational ethics.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Online recruitment document.

References

    1. Townsend A, Adam P, Li LC, McDonald M, Backman CL. Exploring eHealth Ethics and Multi-Morbidity: Protocol for an Interview and Focus Group Study of Patient and Health Care Provider Views and Experiences of Using Digital Media for Health Purposes. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2732.
    1. Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health. 2013 Aug;11:256–270. doi: 10.1057/sth.2013.10).
    1. Hordern A, Georgiou A, Whetton S, Prgomet M. Consumer e-health: an overview of research evidence and implications for future policy. HIM J. 2011;40(2):6–14.
    1. Patient-Centered E-Health (Premier Reference Source) New York: Medical Information Science Reference; 2009.
    1. World Health Organization WHA58-28 on eHealth. 2005. [2014-08-17]. Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly, Resolution 28, Geneva, Switzerland .
    1. Munson SA, Cavusoglu H, Frisch L, Fels S. Sociotechnical challenges and progress in using social media for health. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e226. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2792.
    1. Swan M. Health 2050: The Realization of Personalized Medicine through Crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the Participatory Biocitizen. J Pers Med. 2012;2(3):93–118. doi: 10.3390/jpm2030093.
    1. Lupton D. The Commodification of Patient Opinion: the Digital Patient Experience Economy in the Age of Big Data. 2014. [2014-08-17]. .
    1. Swan M. Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0. JSAN. 2012 Nov 08;1(3):217–253. doi: 10.3390/jsan1030217.
    1. Gruzd A, Haythornthwaite C. Enabling community through social media. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e248. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2796.
    1. Hartzler A, Pratt W. Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1728.
    1. Ho K, Peter Wall Workshop Participants Harnessing the social web for health and wellness: issues for research and knowledge translation. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2969.
    1. Grajales FJ, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2912.
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA. Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 May;2(3):509–17.
    1. Blasco A, Carmona M, Fernández-Lozano Ignacio, Salvador CH, Pascual M, Sagredo PG, Somolinos R, Muñoz Adolfo, García-López Fernando, Escudier JM, Mingo S, Toquero J, Moñivas Vanessa, González Miguel A, Fragua JA, López-Rodríguez Fernando, Monteagudo JL, Alonso-Pulpón Luis. Evaluation of a telemedicine service for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32(1):25–31. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182343aa7.
    1. Department OH. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. 2014. [2014-08-17]. .
    1. Schildmann J, Grunke M, Kalden JR, Vollmann J. Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):775–9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023705.
    1. Steele GC, Miller D, Kuluski K, Cott C. Tying eHealth Tools to Patient Needs: Exploring the Use of eHealth for Community-Dwelling Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(4):e67. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3500.
    1. Pew Research Center Health Online 2013. 2015. [2015-03-16]. .
    1. Williamson L. Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support. Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):4–16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900139.
    1. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, Lee K, Zapert K, Turner R. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(3):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17.
    1. Anderson JG, Rainey MR, Eysenbach G. The impact of CyberHealthcare on the physician-patient relationship. J Med Syst. 2003 Feb;27(1):67–84.
    1. Gauld R, Williams Sheila. Use of the Internet for health information: a study of Australians and New Zealanders. Inform Health Soc Care. 2009 Sep;34(3):149–58. doi: 10.1080/17538150903102448.
    1. Wickramasinghe N, Bali RK, Suomi R, Kirn S, editors. Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable E-health Solutions (Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age) New York: Springer; 2010. Patient Empowerment: A Two Way Road.
    1. Van de Belt Tom H, Engelen Lucien J L P G, Berben Sivera A A, Teerenstra S, Samsom M, Schoonhoven L. Internet and social media for health-related information and communication in health care: preferences of the Dutch general population. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e220. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2607.
    1. Seçkin Gül. Health information on the web and consumers' perspectives on health professionals' responses to information exchange. Med 2 0. 2014;3(2):e4. doi: 10.2196/med20.3213.
    1. Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):266–71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.028.
    1. Caiata-Zufferey M, Schulz PJ. Physicians' communicative strategies in interacting with Internet-informed patients: results from a qualitative study. Health Commun. 2012;27(8):738–49. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.636478.
    1. Imes RS, Bylund CL, Sabee CM, Routsong TR, Sanford AA. Patients' reasons for refraining from discussing internet health information with their healthcare providers. Health Commun. 2008 Nov;23(6):538–47. doi: 10.1080/10410230802460580.
    1. Fujioka Y, Stewart E. How do physicians discuss e-health with patients? the relationship of physicians' e-health beliefs to physician mediation styles. Health Commun. 2013;28(4):317–28. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.682971.
    1. Bowes P, Stevenson F, Ahluwalia S, Murray E. 'I need her to be a doctor': patients' experiences of presenting health information from the internet in GP consultations. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Nov;62(604):e732–8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X658250.
    1. Elwyn G, Tilburt J, Montori V. The ethical imperative for shared decision-making. Eur J Pers Centered Healthc. 2013;1(1):129–31. doi: 10.5750/ejpch.vlil.645).
    1. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006.
    1. Armstrong D. Actors, patients and agency: a recent history. Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Feb;36(2):163–74. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12100.
    1. Henry MS. Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship. J Med Ethics. 2006 Jun;32(6):321–3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013987.
    1. Felzman H. Adherence, compliance, and concordance: an ethical perspective. Nurse Prescribing. 2012;10(8):406–411.
    1. Agarwal AK, Murinson BB. New dimensions in patient-physician interaction: values, autonomy, and medical information in the patient-centered clinical encounter. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2012 Jul;3(3):e0017. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10085.
    1. Sherwin S. A Relational Approach to Autonomy in Health Care in The Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network. In: Sherwin S, editor. The Politics of Women’s Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1998. pp. 19–47.
    1. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
    1. Austin W. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2014. [2014-08-16]. Engagement in contemporary practice: a relational ethics perspective .
    1. Fullwood C, Kennedy A, Rogers A, Eden M, Gardner C, Protheroe J, Reeves D. Patients' experiences of shared decision making in primary care practices in the United kingdom. Med Decis Making. 2013 Jan;33(1):26–36. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12464825.
    1. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul;25(7):741–5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2.
    1. Trobec I, Herbst M, Zvanut B. Differentiating between rights-based and relational ethical approaches. Nurs Ethics. 2009 May;16(3):283–91. doi: 10.1177/0969733009102689.
    1. Townsend A, Adam P, Cox SM, Li LC. Everyday ethics and help-seeking in early rheumatoid arthritis. Chronic Illn. 2010 Sep;6(3):171–82. doi: 10.1177/1742395309351963.
    1. Ells C, Hunt M, Chambers-Evans J. Relational Autonomy as an Essential Component of Patient-Centered Care. Engagement in Contemporary Practice: A Relational Ethics Perspective. 2011;4(2):79–101. doi: 10.1353/ijf.2011.0025.
    1. Public Health Agency of CanadaLife with Arthritis in Canada A Personal and Public Health Challenge. 2013. [2015-04-08]. .
    1. Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K. Frequent consulting and multiple morbidity: a qualitative comparison of 'high' and 'low' consulters of GPs. Fam Pract. 2008 Jun;25(3):168–75. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn017.
    1. Mercer S, Gunn J, Wyke S. Improving the health of people with multimorbidity: the need for prospective cohort studies. Journ Comorbid. 2011;1:4–7. doi: 10.15256/joc.2011.1.10).
    1. Dedding C, van DR, Winkler L, Reis R. How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(1):49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.017.
    1. Calvillo J, Román Isabel, Roa LM. How technology is empowering patients? A literature review. Health Expect. 2013 May 28;:-. doi: 10.1111/hex.12089.
    1. Hoffmann TC, Légaré France, Simmons MB, McNamara K, McCaffery K, Trevena LJ, Hudson B, Glasziou PP, Del Mar Christopher B. Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? Med J Aust. 2014 Jul 7;201(1):35–9.
    1. Henderson S. Power imbalance between nurses and patients: a potential inhibitor of partnership in care. J Clin Nurs. 2003 Jul;12(4):501–8.
    1. Latter S, Maben J, Myall M, Young A. Perceptions and practice of concordance in nurses' prescribing consultations: findings from a national questionnaire survey and case studies of practice in England. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jan;44(1):9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.005.
    1. Ahluwalia S, Murray E, Stevenson F, Kerr C, Burns J. 'A heartbeat moment': qualitative study of GP views of patients bringing health information from the internet to a consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Feb;60(571):88–94. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483120.
    1. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006.
    1. Stevenson FA, Kerr C, Murray E, Nazareth I. Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective--a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-47.
    1. Calnan M, Rowe R. Trust and Health Care. Sociol Compass. 2007;1(1):283–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00007.x.
    1. Zulman DM, Jenchura EC, Cohen DM, Lewis ET, Houston TK, Asch SM. How Can eHealth Technology Address Challenges Related to Multimorbidity? Perspectives from Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb 18;:-. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3222-9.
    1. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home (Jossey Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1988.
    1. Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K. Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn. 2006 Sep;2(3):185–94. doi: 10.1179/174592006X129518.
    1. Groopman LC, Miller FG, Fins JJ. The patient's work. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007;16(1):44–52.
    1. Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD, Emmerton L. Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3706.
    1. Silver MP. Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3588.
    1. Dyer KA. Ethical challenges of medicine and health on the Internet: a review. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):E23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e23.
    1. Medlock S, Eslami S, Askari M, Arts DL, Sent D, de Rooij Sophia E, Abu-Hanna A. Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3749.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다