The high molecular weight dipeptidyl peptidase IV Pol d 3 is a major allergen of Polistes dominula venom

Maximilian Schiener, Christiane Hilger, Bernadette Eberlein, Mariona Pascal, Annette Kuehn, Dominique Revets, Sébastien Planchon, Gunilla Pietsch, Pilar Serrano, Carmen Moreno-Aguilar, Federico de la Roca, Tilo Biedermann, Ulf Darsow, Carsten B Schmidt-Weber, Markus Ollert, Simon Blank, Maximilian Schiener, Christiane Hilger, Bernadette Eberlein, Mariona Pascal, Annette Kuehn, Dominique Revets, Sébastien Planchon, Gunilla Pietsch, Pilar Serrano, Carmen Moreno-Aguilar, Federico de la Roca, Tilo Biedermann, Ulf Darsow, Carsten B Schmidt-Weber, Markus Ollert, Simon Blank

Abstract

Hymenoptera venom allergy can cause severe anaphylaxis in untreated patients. Polistes dominula is an important elicitor of venom allergy in Southern Europe as well as in the United States. Due to its increased spreading to more moderate climate zones, Polistes venom allergy is likely to gain importance also in these areas. So far, only few allergens of Polistes dominula venom were identified as basis for component-resolved diagnostics. Therefore, this study aimed to broaden the available panel of important Polistes venom allergens. The 100 kDa allergen Pol d 3 was identified by mass spectrometry and found to be a dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Recombinantly produced Pol d 3 exhibited sIgE-reactivity with approximately 66% of Polistes venom-sensitized patients. Moreover, its clinical relevance was supported by the potent activation of basophils from allergic patients. Cross-reactivity with the dipeptidyl peptidases IV from honeybee and yellow jacket venom suggests the presence of exclusive as well as conserved IgE epitopes. The obtained data suggest a pivotal role of Pol d 3 as sensitizing component of Polistes venom, thus supporting its status as a major allergen of clinical relevance. Therefore, Pol d 3 might become a key element for proper diagnosis of Polistes venom allergy.

Conflict of interest statement

MS has received travel support from ALK-Abelló and Bencard. BE has received research funding from Bühlmann Laboratories. UD has been speaker, investigator and /or been a member of advisory boards for Allergopharma, ALK-Abelló, Bencard, GSK, Hermal, MEDA, Novartis Pharma, Stallergenes, Stiefel. TB has received research funding, speaker’s honorarium and consultancy fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific, has received research support from DFG, Novartis and Thermo Fisher Scientific, has received lecture fees from MSD, Novartis, HIPP GmbH & Co, ALK-Abelló, MedComms Ltd and Astellas Pharma GmbH. CBS-W has received grants from Allergopharma, Leti, PLS-Design and Regeneron; is member of the scientific advisory board of Leti and Bencard; has received consultancy fees from Leti, GLG Consultancy, Allergopharma and Bencard. MO has received consultancy fees from Siemens Healthcare, Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics and Bencard; has received lecture fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bencard and Siemens Healthcare; is co-founder of PLS-Design GmbH. SB has received speaker’s honorarium and/or travel support from ALK-Abelló, Bencard and Thermo Fisher Scientific; has received consultancy fees as an advisory board member and research support from Bencard and Allergy Therapeutics. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detection of Pol d 3 in Polistes dominula venom. SDS-PAGE and protein staining (SyproRuby staining) of PDV (left) and sIgE-immunoreactivity of pooled sera from PDV-allergic patients with PDV in Western blot (right). The arrow indicates the 100 kDa band that was subjected to tandem mass spectrometry and MALDI-TOF analyses. Asterisks indicate the band that was identified as Pol d 5 and black bars the area of the gel/blot in which Pol 1 and Pol d 4 were identified. Shown are parts of the gel. Blot and full-length gels are shown in Supplemental Fig. S3. The kDa values correspond to the protein marker (not shown) which can be found in Fig. S3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alignment of Pol d 3 with Ves v 3 and Api m 5. Mature amino acid sequences of Pol d 3 (Polistes dominula), Ves v 3 (Vespula vulgaris) and Api m 5 (Apis mellifera) are shown. Black shaded amino acids are identical between all three proteins, gray shaded amino acids are shared by two proteins and amino acids not shaded are unique to the individual protein. Peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry are underlined in black and potential N-glycosylation sites in gray. The residues involved in the conserved active center of the enzymes are represented boxed. Overall amino acid identity between the different proteins is stated in percent.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Recombinant expression and characterisation of Pol d 3. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses of Pol d 3 recombinantly produced in Sf9 insect cells in comparison with the HBV and YJV homologues Api m 5 and Ves v 3 either by Coomassie blue staining or anti-V5 epitope antibody, GNA (Galanthus nivalis agglutinin), anti-HRP antiserum, anti-Api m 5 antiserum and pooled sera of PDV-allergic patients. Shown are parts of one or more gels and blots and full-length gels and blots are given in Supplemental Fig. S3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Basophil activation tests of (a) PDV- and/or YJV-allergic patients from Spain (area of Barcelona) and (b) HBV- and/or YJV-allergic patients from Germany with recombinant DPP IV allergens Pol d 3, Ves v 3 or Api m 5. Basophils were exposed to different concentrations of the DPP IV allergens. Additionally, stimulation with anti-FcεRI antibody (positive control) and plain stimulation buffer (negative control) is shown. Activation is shown as percentage of CD63+ out of total basophilic cells. The cut-off of the assay (10%) is represented as dotted line.
Figure 5
Figure 5
sIgE reactivity of individual hymenoptera venom-allergic patients with recombinant DPP IV allergens in ELISA. (a) sIgE immunoreactivity of PDV- (n = 30), HBV- (n = 28) and YJV-allergic patients (n = 20) with Pol d 3. (b) Comparative sIgE immunoreactivity of Pol d 3-positive HBV-allergic patients with Pol d 3 and Api m 5. (c) Comparative sIgE immunoreactivity of Pol d 3-positive YJV-allergic patients with Pol d 3 and Ves v 3. The lower end cut-off of the ELISAs is represented by dotted lines.

References

    1. Bilo BM, et al. Diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy. 2005;60:1339–1349. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00963.x.
    1. Caruso B, et al. Wasp venom allergy screening with recombinant allergen testing. Diagnostic performance of rPol d 5 and rVes v 5 for differentiating sensitization to Vespula and Polistes subspecies. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;453:170–173. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.026.
    1. Monsalve RI, et al. Component-resolved diagnosis of vespid venom-allergic individuals: phospholipases and antigen 5s are necessary to identify Vespula or Polistes sensitization. Allergy. 2012;67:528–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02781.x.
    1. Ollert M, Blank S. Anaphylaxis to Insect Venom Allergens: Role of Molecular Diagnostics. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:527. doi: 10.1007/s11882-015-0527-z.
    1. Sanchez F, et al. Comparative study between European and American species of Polistes using sera from European sensitized subjects. Clin Exp Allergy. 1995;25:281–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1995.tb01041.x.
    1. Schiener M, Graessel A, Ollert M, Schmidt-Weber CB, Blank S. Allergen-specific immunotherapy of Hymenoptera venom allergy - also a matter of diagnosis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13:2467–2481. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1334745.
    1. Cervo R, Zacchi F, Turillazzi S. Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) invading North America: some hypotheses for its rapid spread. Insectes Sociaux. 2000;47:155–157. doi: 10.1007/PL00001694.
    1. Eardley C, Koch F, Wood AR. Polistes dominulus (Christ, 1791) (Hymenoptera: Polistinae: Vespidae) newly recorded from South Africa: short communication. African Entomology. 2009;17:226–227. doi: 10.4001/003.017.0214.
    1. Höcherl N, Tautz J. Nesting behavior of the paper wasp Polistes dominula in CentralEurope - a flexible system for expanding into new areas. Ecosphere. 2015;6:1–11. doi: 10.1890/ES15-00254.1.
    1. Sturm, G. J. et al. EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy (2017).
    1. Golden DB. Insect sting anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2007;27:261–272, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2007.03.008.
    1. Juarez C, et al. Specific IgE antibodies to vespids in the course of immunotherapy with Vespula germanica administered to patients sensitized to Polistes dominulus. Allergy. 1992;47:299–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1992.tb02057.x.
    1. Baker TW, et al. Stinging insect identification: Are the allergy specialists any better than their patients? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;116:431–434. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.01.025.
    1. Antolin-Amerigo, D. et al. Component-resolved diagnosis in hymenoptera allergy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) (2017).
    1. Jakob T, Muller U, Helbling A, Spillner E. Component resolved diagnostics for hymenoptera venom allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;17:363–372. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000390.
    1. Frick M, et al. rApi m 3 and rApi m 10 improve detection of honey bee sensitization in Hymenoptera venom-allergic patients with double sensitization to honey bee and yellow jacket venom. Allergy. 2015;70:1665–1668. doi: 10.1111/all.12725.
    1. Hofmann SC, Pfender N, Weckesser S, Huss-Marp J, Jakob T. Added value of IgE detection to rApi m 1 and rVes v 5 in patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:265–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.042.
    1. Kohler, J. et al. Component resolution reveals additional major allergens in patients with honeybee venom allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol133, 1383–1389, 1389 e1381–1386 (2014).
    1. Korosec P, et al. High sensitivity of CAP-FEIA rVes v 5 and rVes v 1 for diagnosis of Vespula venom allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:1406–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.975.
    1. Matricardi PM, et al. EAACI Molecular Allergology User’s Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27(Suppl 23):1–250. doi: 10.1111/pai.12563.
    1. Mittermann I, et al. Recombinant allergen-based IgE testing to distinguish bee and wasp allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(1300–1307):e1303.
    1. Muller U, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Hausmann O, Helbling A. IgE to recombinant allergens Api m 1, Ves v 1, and Ves v 5 distinguish double sensitization from crossreaction in venom allergy. Allergy. 2012;67:1069–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02847.x.
    1. Moawad TI, Hoffman DR, Zalat S. Isolation, cloning and characterization of Polistes dominulus venom phospholipase A1 and its isoforms. Acta Biol Hung. 2005;56:261–274. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.56.2005.3-4.9.
    1. Hoffman DR, Severino MG, Campi P, Turillazzi S, Zerboni R. Protease is an important allergen in European Polistes wasp venom allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101:S33. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70190-3.
    1. Pantera B, et al. Characterization of the major allergens purified from the venom of the paper wasp Polistes gallicus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1623:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2003.07.001.
    1. Blank S, et al. Polistes species venom is devoid of carbohydrate-based cross-reactivity and allows interference-free diagnostics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:1239–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.047.
    1. Caruso B, et al. Evaluation of the IgE cross-reactions among vespid venoms. A possible approach for the choice of immunotherapy. Allergy. 2007;62:561–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01353.x.
    1. Schiener M, et al. Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics. Allergy. 2017;72:98–108. doi: 10.1111/all.13000.
    1. Blank S, et al. Identification, recombinant expression, and characterization of the 100 kDa high molecular weight hymenoptera venom allergens Api m 5 and Ves v 3. J Immunol. 2010;184:5403–5413. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803709.
    1. Standage DS, et al. Genome, transcriptome and methylome sequencing of a primitively eusocial wasp reveal a greatly reduced DNA methylation system in a social insect. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1769–1784. doi: 10.1111/mec.13578.
    1. Chauhan JS, Rao A, Raghava GP. In silico platform for prediction of N-, O- and C-glycosites in eukaryotic protein sequences. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067008.
    1. Aertgeerts K, et al. Crystal structure of human dipeptidyl peptidase IV in complex with a decapeptide reveals details on substrate specificity and tetrahedral intermediate formation. Protein Sci. 2004;13:412–421. doi: 10.1110/ps.03460604.
    1. Kreil G, Haiml L, Suchanek G. Stepwise cleavage of the pro part of promelittin by dipeptidylpeptidase IV. Evidence for a new type of precursor-product conversion. Eur J Biochem. 1980;111:49–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb06073.x.
    1. Radauer C, et al. Update of the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Database based on analysis of allergen sequences. Allergy. 2014;69:413–419. doi: 10.1111/all.12348.
    1. Blank S, et al. Evaluation of different glycoforms of honeybee venom major allergen phospholipase A2 (Api m 1) produced in insect cells. Protein Pept Lett. 2011;18:415–422. doi: 10.2174/092986611794653923.
    1. Blank S, et al. Api m 10, a genuine A. mellifera venom allergen, is clinically relevant but underrepresented in therapeutic extracts. Allergy. 2011;66:1322–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02667.x.
    1. Seismann H, et al. Dissecting cross-reactivity in hymenoptera venom allergy by circumvention of alpha-1,3-core fucosylation. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:799–808. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.10.005.
    1. Eberlein B, Krischan L, Darsow U, Ollert M, Ring J. Double positivity to bee and wasp venom: improved diagnostic procedure by recombinant allergen-based IgE testing and basophil activation test including data about cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.008.
    1. Frick M, et al. Predominant Api m 10 sensitization as risk factor for treatment failure in honey bee venom immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(1663–1671):e1669.
    1. Blank S, et al. Component-resolved evaluation of the content of major allergens in therapeutic extracts for specific immunotherapy of honeybee venom allergy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13:2482–2489. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1323603.
    1. Hemmer W. [Cross reactions between Hymenoptera venoms from different families, genera and species] Hautarzt. 2014;65:775–779. doi: 10.1007/s00105-014-2776-5.
    1. Jin C, et al. Reassessing the role of hyaluronidase in yellow jacket venom allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(184–190):e181.
    1. Grant JA, et al. Diagnosis of Polistes wasp hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983;72:399–406. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(83)90506-7.
    1. Aird SD. Snake venom dipeptidyl peptidase IV: taxonomic distribution and quantitative variation. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;150:222–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.03.005.
    1. Position paper: Allergen standardization and skin tests The European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 1993;48:48–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1993.tb04698.x.
    1. Ring J, Messmer K. Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet. 1977;1:466–469. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(77)91953-5.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다