Responses to Ixekizumab in Male and Female Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from Two Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Lihi Eder, Hans-Peter Tony, Satish Odhav, Eva Galindez Agirregoikoa, Mariusz Korkosz, Sergio Schwartzman, Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery, Amanda M Gellett, So Young Park, Clinton C Bertram, Alexis Ogdie, Lihi Eder, Hans-Peter Tony, Satish Odhav, Eva Galindez Agirregoikoa, Mariusz Korkosz, Sergio Schwartzman, Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery, Amanda M Gellett, So Young Park, Clinton C Bertram, Alexis Ogdie

Abstract

Introduction: Differences in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment response between sexes for ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist, are largely unexplored. This analysis used data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating ixekizumab to study differences in treatment response between male and female patients with PsA.

Methods: We used pooled data from patients enrolled in SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 (NCT01695239 and NCT02349295, respectively), phase 3 RCTs evaluating ixekizumab every 4 and 2 weeks in patients with active PsA. Subgroups of patients were defined by sex (male, female). Efficacy was measured by the proportion of male and female patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement criteria (ACR20/50/70), minimal disease activity or very low disease activity (MDA/VLDA), and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) scores representing low disease activity (LDA) or remission through week 156. Changes from baseline in components of the above measures were also assessed through week 156.

Results: Compared to male patients at baseline, female patients were older, had higher body mass index and lower C-reactive protein levels, and had worse tender joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, and Leeds Enthesitis Index scores. Through week 156, female patients in all treatment arms had lower response rates than male patients in all analyzed composite measures (ACR20/50/70; MDA/VLDA; DAPSA LDA/remission), with significant differences observed at multiple timepoints in both ixekizumab treatment arms. Female patients also had smaller numeric changes from baseline in the composite measures' individual components.

Conclusion: Compared to female patients, male patients had greater response rates in ACR20/50/70, MDA/VLDA, and DAPSA LDA/remission and numerically larger improvements in these measures' individual components, although clinical significance is unclear. Continued efforts to understand sex differences in treatment response may provide insights that can help optimize clinical decision making.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT01695239 and NCT02349295.

Keywords: Ixekizumab; Outcome measures; Psoriatic arthritis; Sex differences; Women’s health.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of male and female patients treated with ixekizumab Q4W achieving ACR20/50/70 (a, b), MDA/VLDA (c, d), and DAPSA LDA/DAPSA Remission (e, f) through 156 weeks. Missing data were imputed by mNRI. P values were calculated for proportions of male vs. female responders; *P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01, †P < 0.001. ACR20/50/70 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement from baseline in the American College of Rheumatology criteria; DAPSA Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis, LDA low disease activity, MDA minimal disease activity, Ns number of patients in the subgroup, VLDA very low disease activity, Q4W every 4 weeks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of male and female patients treated with ixekizumab Q2W achieving ACR20/50/70 (a, b), MDA/VLDA (c, d), and DAPSA LDA/DAPSA Remission (e, f) through 156 weeks. Missing data were imputed by mNRI. P values were calculated for proportions of male vs. female responders; *P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01, †P < 0.001. DAPSA Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis, LDA low disease activity, MDA minimal disease activity, Ns number of patients in the subgroup, VLDA very low disease activity, Q2W every 2 weeks
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes from baseline in male and female patients treated with ixekizumab Q4W for TJC (a), SJC (b), Pain VAS (c), PtGA (d), PhGA (e), HAQ-DI (f), CRP (g), PASI (h), and LEI (i) through 156 weeks. Missing data were imputed by mBOCF. TJC includes 68 joints; SJC includes 66 joints. Pain VAS, PtGA, and PhGA are measured on a 0–100 scale. HAQ-DI is measured on a 0–3 scale. CRP is measured in mg/L. PASI is measured on a 0–72 scale. LEI is measured on a 0–6 scale. Change from baseline in PASI was measured in 77 male patients and 64 female patients with ≥ 3% body surface area affected at baseline. Change from baseline in LEI was measured in 57 male patients and 79 female patients with LEI > 0 at baseline. CRP C-reactive protein, HAQ-DI Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, LEI Leeds Enthesitis Index, mBOCF modified baseline observation carried forward, Ns number of patients in subgroup, Pain VAS Pain Visual Analog Scale, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PhGA Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity, PtGA Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity, SJC swollen joint count, TJC tender joint count, Q4W every 4 weeks
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Changes from baseline in male and female patients treated with ixekizumab Q2W for TJC (a), SJC (b), Pain VAS (c), PtGA (d), PhGA (e), HAQ-DI (f), CRP (g), PASI (h), and LEI (i) through 156 weeks. Missing data were imputed by mBOCF. TJC includes 68 joints; SJC includes 66 joints. Pain VAS, PtGA, and PhGA are measured on a 0–100 scale. HAQ-DI is measured on a 0–3 scale. CRP is measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L). PASI is measured on a 0–72 scale. LEI is measured on a 0–6 scale. Change from baseline in PASI was measured in 67 male patients and 60 female patients with ≥ 3% body surface area affected at baseline. Change from baseline in LEI was measured in 50 male patients and 91 female patients with LEI > 0 at baseline. CRP C-reactive protein, HAQ-DI Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, LEI Leeds Enthesitis Index, mBOCF modified baseline observation carried forward, Ns number of patients in subgroup, Pain VAS Pain Visual Analog Scale, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PhGA Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity, PsA psoriatic arthritis, PtGA Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity, SJC swollen joint count, TJC tender joint count, Q2W every 2 weeks

References

    1. Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. Dermatol Ther. 2009;22(1):40–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.01215.x.
    1. Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):957–970. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505557.
    1. Mease PJ, van der Heijde D, Ritchlin CT, et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):79–87. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209709.
    1. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2317–2327. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31429-0.
    1. Eder L, Thavaneswaran A, Chandran V, Gladman DD. Gender difference in disease expression, radiographic damage and disability among patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(4):578–582. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201357.
    1. Generali E, Sciré CA, Cantarini L, Selmi C. Sex differences in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review. Israel Med Assoc J. 2016;18(3–4):203–208.
    1. Wright GC, Kaine J, Deodhar A. Understanding differences between men and women with axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50(4):687–694. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.05.005.
    1. Hekmat K, Jacobsson LT, Nilsson J, Lindroth Y, Turesson C. Changes and sex differences in patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid factor positive RA-results from a community based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-44.
    1. Eder L, Gladman DD. Predictors for clinical outcome in psoriatic arthritis—What have we learned from cohort studies? Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014;10(6):763–770. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2014.905741.
    1. Colombo D, Chimenti S, Grossi PA, et al. Prevalence of acute and chronic viral seropositivity and characteristics of disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with cyclosporine: a post hoc analysis from a sex point of view on the observational study of infectious events in psoriasis complicated by active psoriatic arthritis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016;9:1–7.
    1. Højgaard P, Ballegaard C, Cordtz R, et al. Gender differences in biologic treatment outcomes-a study of 1750 patients with psoriatic arthritis using danish health care registers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57(9):1651–1660. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key140.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36(6):729–40.
    1. Schoels M, Aletaha D, Funovits J, Kavanaugh A, Baker D, Smolen JS. Application of the DAREA/DAPSA score for assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(8):1441–1447. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.122259.
    1. Taylor PC, Lee YC, Fleischmann R, et al. Achieving pain control in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Baricitinib or Adalimumab plus Methotrexate: results from the RA-BEAM Trial. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):831.
    1. Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):48–53. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102053.
    1. Yuan Y. Multiple Imputations Using SAS Software. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(6):1–25. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i06.
    1. Theander E, Husmark T, Alenius GM, et al. Early psoriatic arthritis: short symptom duration, male gender and preserved physical functioning at presentation predict favourable outcome at 5-year follow-up. Results from the Swedish Early Psoriatic Arthritis Register (SwePsA). Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(2):407–13.
    1. Orbai AM, Perin J, Gorlier C, et al. Determinants of patient-reported psoriatic arthritis impact of disease: an analysis of the association with sex in 458 patients from fourteen countries. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72(12):1772–1779. doi: 10.1002/acr.24090.
    1. Queiro R, Sarasqueta C, Torre JC, Tinturé T, López-Lagunas I. Comparative analysis of psoriatic spondyloarthropathy between men and women. Rheumatol Int. 2001;21(2):66–68. doi: 10.1007/s002960100135.
    1. Gladman DD, Brubacher B, Buskila D, Langevitz P, Farewell VT. Psoriatic spondyloarthropathy in men and women: a clinical, radiographic, and HLA study. Clin Invest Med. 1992;15(4):371–375.
    1. Gladman DD, Shuckett R, Russell ML, Thorne JC, Schachter RK. Psoriatic arthritis (PSA)—an analysis of 220 patients. Q J Med. 1987;62(238):127–141.
    1. Duruöz MT, Gezer HH, Nas K, et al. Gender-related differences in disease activity and clinical features in patients with peripheral psoriatic arthritis: A multi-center study. Joint Bone Spine. 2021;88(4):105177.
    1. Glintborg B, Østergaard M, Dreyer L, et al. Treatment response, drug survival, and predictors thereof in 764 patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy: results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(2):382–390. doi: 10.1002/art.30117.
    1. Druyts E, Palmer JB, Balijepalli C, et al. Treatment modifying factors of biologics for psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-regression. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(4):681–688.
    1. Mease PJ, Karki C, Liu M, et al. Discontinuation and switching patterns of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) in TNFi-naive and TNFi-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis: an observational study from the US-based Corrona registry. RMD Open. 2019;5(1):e000880.
    1. Benavent D, Plasencia C, Navarro-Compán V, et al. AB0736 Gender influence on treatment effectiveness in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1832–1833.
    1. Kiltz U, Brandt-Juergens J, Kästner P, Riechers E, Peterlik D, Tony HP. POS1023 How does gender affect secukinumab treatment outcomes and retention rates in patients with psoriatic arthritis?—real world data from the german aquila study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:780–781. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.142.
    1. Markenson JA, Gibofsky A, Palmer WR, et al. Persistence with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: observations from the RADIUS registry. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(7):1273–1281. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101142.
    1. Heiberg MS, Koldingsnes W, Mikkelsen K, Rødevand E, Kaufmann C, Mowinckel P, et al. The comparative one-year performance of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: results from a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(2):234–240. doi: 10.1002/art.23333.
    1. Pavelka K, Forejtová S, Stolfa J, et al. Anti-TNF therapy of ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice. Results from the Czech national registry ATTRA. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(6):958–63.
    1. Neuenschwander R, Hebeisen M, Micheroli R, Niedermann K, et al. Differences between men and women with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: clinical characteristics and treatment effectiveness in a real-life prospective cohort. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02337-2.
    1. Micheroli R, Tellenbach C, Scherer A, et al. Effectiveness of secukinumab versus an alternative TNF inhibitor in patients with axial spondyloarthritis previously exposed to TNF inhibitors in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(9):1203–1209. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215934.
    1. Lesuis N, Befrits R, Nyberg F, van Vollenhoven RF. Gender and the treatment of immune-mediated chronic inflammatory diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis: an observational study. BMC Med. 2012;10:82. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-82.
    1. Iannone F, Nivuori M, Fornaro M, Venerito V, Cacciapaglia F, Lopalco G. Comorbid fibromyalgia impairs the effectiveness of biologic drugs in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59(7):1599–1606. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez505.
    1. Nazmi A, Victora CG. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differentials of C-reactive protein levels: a systematic review of population-based studies. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-212.
    1. Bray C, Bell LN, Liang H, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and c-reactive protein measurements and their relevance in clinical medicine. WMJ. 2016;115(6):317–321.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다