Radiation dosimetry and first therapy results with a (124)I/ (131)I-labeled small molecule (MIP-1095) targeting PSMA for prostate cancer therapy

Christian M Zechmann, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Tom Armor, James B Stubbs, Walter Mier, Boris Hadaschik, John Joyal, Klaus Kopka, Jürgen Debus, John W Babich, Uwe Haberkorn, Christian M Zechmann, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Tom Armor, James B Stubbs, Walter Mier, Boris Hadaschik, John Joyal, Klaus Kopka, Jürgen Debus, John W Babich, Uwe Haberkorn

Abstract

Introduction: Since the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is frequently over-expressed in prostate cancer (PCa) several PSMA-targeting molecules are under development to detect and treat metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We investigated the tissue kinetics of a small molecule inhibitor of PSMA ((S)-2-(3-((S)-1-carboxy-5-(3-(4-[(124)I]iodophenyl)ureido)pentyl)ureido)pentanedioicacid; MIP-1095) using PET/CT to estimate radiation dosimetry for the potential therapeutic use of (131)I-MIP-1095 in men with mCRPC. We also report preliminary safety and efficacy of the first 28 consecutive patients treated under a compassionate-use protocol with a single cycle of (131)I-MIP-1095.

Methods: Sixteen patients with known prostate cancer underwent PET/CT imaging after i.v. administration of (124)I-MIP-1095 (mean activity: 67.4 MBq). Each patient was scanned using PET/CT up to five times at 1, 4, 24, 48 and 72 h post injection. Volumes of interest were defined for tumor lesions and normal organs at each time point followed by dose calculations using the OLINDA/EXM software. Twenty-eight men with mCRPC were treated with a single cycle of (131)I-MIP-1095 (mean activity: 4.8 GBq, range 2 to 7.2 GBq) and followed for safety and efficacy. Baseline and follow up examinations included a complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, and measurement of serum PSA.

Results: I-124-MIP-1095 PET/CT images showed excellent tumor uptake and moderate uptake in liver, proximal intestine and within a few hours post-injection also in the kidneys. High uptake values were observed only in salivary and lacrimal glands. Dosimetry estimates for I-131-MIP-1095 revealed that the highest absorbed doses were delivered to the salivary glands (3.8 mSv/MBq, liver (1.7 mSv/MBq) and kidneys (1.4 mSv/MBq). The absorbed dose calculated for the red marrow was 0.37 mSv/MBq. PSA values decreased by >50 % in 60.7 % of the men treated. Of men with bone pain, 84.6 % showed complete or moderate reduction in pain. Hematological toxicities were mild. Of men treated, 25 % had a transient slight to moderate dry mouth. No adverse effects on renal function were observed.

Conclusion: Based on the biodistribution and dose calculations of the PSMA-targeted small molecule (124)I-MIP-1095 therapy with the authentic analog (131)I-MIP-1095 enables a targeted tumor therapy with unprecedented doses delivered to the tumor lesions. Involved lymph node and bone metastases were exposed to estimated absorbed doses upwards of 300 Gy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
124I-MIP-1095 PET images (maximal intensity projection) of patient 01 as a function of time
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average SUVs for normal organs (a and b) and tumor (c). Mean tumor SUVs are determined from 110 individual lesions in 16 patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Anterior and posterior whole body scintigrams of 131I-MIP-1095 in patient 01 at 7, 10 and 17 days post injection
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Hematological data for all patients prior to and after treatment; leukocytes (a), erythrocytes (b) and platelets (c). Solid red lines indicate range or normal limit
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Renal function tests for all patients prior to and after therapy; GFR, measured with 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphy (a), Serum creatinine (b), Blood urea nitrogen (c). Solid red lines indicate range or normal limit
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Effects of PSMA ligand therapy on PSA values. a Waterfall plot of best PSA response, compared to baseline, after a single cycle of 131I-MIP-1095; b Relation of change in PSA to the activity given and c Relation of the time to PSA progression to the activity given
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Patient 04. a Pre-therapy 124I-MIP-1095 PET scans (top) and CT scan (bottom). b Pre-therapy SUV values for LN metastasis, recurrent tumor, submandibular salivary glands and parotid glands as a function of time. c Serum PSA values as a function of time from treatment. d Post-therapy Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-[68Ga]-HBED-CC PET scan (top) and CT scan (bottom)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Two patients (a, b and c, d) prior (a, c) and after (b, d) therapy showing reduced tracer accumulation in their tumor lesions after treatment

References

    1. American Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance Research; Cancer Facts & Figures, 2012.
    1. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. SEER stat fact sheets: prostate. Available from:
    1. Litwin MS, et al. Epidemiological trends and financial outcomes in radical prostatectomy among medicare beneficiaries, 1991 to 1993. J Urol. 1998;160:445–448. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62921-5.
    1. Ahmedin J, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.
    1. Smith-Jones PM, Vallabahajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, Navarro V, Hunter CJ, Bastidas D, et al. In vitro characterization of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies specific for the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5237.
    1. Ghosh A, Heston WD. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91:528–539. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10661.
    1. Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, Kostakoglu L, Milowsky MI, Nanus DM, Bander NH. Radioimmunotherapy of prostate cancer using 90Y- and 177Lu-labeled J591 monoclonal antibodies: effect of multiple treatments on myelotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7195s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1004-0023.
    1. Milowsky MI, Nanus DM, Kostakoglu L, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, Bander NH. Phase I trial of yttrium-90-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 for androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(13):2522–2531. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.154.
    1. Bander NH, Milowsky MI, Nanus DM, Kostakoglu L, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, et al. Phase I trial of 177Lutetium-labeled J591, a monoclonal antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4591–4601. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.160.
    1. Vallabhajosula A, Goldsmith SJ, Hamacher KA, Kostakoglu L, Konishi S, Milowski MI, et al. Prediction of myelotoxicity based on bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose: radioimmunotherapy studies using 90Y- and 177Lu-labeled J591 antibodies specific for prostate-specific membrane antigen. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:850–858.
    1. Tagawa ST, Milowsky MI, Morris M, Vallabhajosula S, Christos P, Akhtar NH et al. Phase II study of lutetium-177 labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)monoclonal antibody J591 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Can Res 2013. Aug 26 Epub ahead of print.
    1. Maresca KP, Hillier SM, Femia FJ, Keith D, Barone C, Joyal JL, et al. A series of halogenated heterodimeric inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as radiolabeled probes for targeting prostate cancer. J Med Chem. 2009;52(2):347–357.
    1. Hillier SM, Maresca KP, Femia FJ, Marquis JC, Foss CA, Nguyen N, et al. Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate-urea-lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6932–6940. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1682.
    1. Hillier S, Rubino K, Maresca K, Marquis J, Tesson M, Zimmerman C, et al. [131I]MIP-1466, a small molecule prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor for targeted radiotherapy of prostate cancer (PCa) J Nucl Med. 2012;53(Suppl 1):170.
    1. Hillier S, Merkin R, Maresca K, Zimmerman C, Barrett J, Tesson M, et al. [131I]MIP-1375, a small molecule prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor for targeted therapy of prostate cancer (PCa) J Nucl Med. 2011;52(Suppl 1):361.
    1. Levitzki A. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: views of selectivity, sensitivity, and clinical performance. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;53:161–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140341.
    1. Eder M, Schafer M, Bauder-Wust U, Hull WE, Wangler C, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-Complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23:688–697. doi: 10.1021/bc200279b.
    1. Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027.
    1. Barrett JA, Coleman RE, Goldsmith SJ, Vallabhajosula S, Petry NA, Cho S, et al. First-in-man evaluation of two high-affinity PSMA-avid small molecules for imaging prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(3):380–387. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.111203.
    1. Troyer JK, Beckett ML, Wright GL. Detection and characterization of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in tissue extracts and body fluids. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:552–558. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910620511.
    1. Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85.
    1. Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Zhang S, Terracciano L, Sauter G, Chadhuri A, Herrmann FR, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) protein expression in normal and neoplastic tissues and its sensitivity and specificity in prostate adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study using multiple tumour tissue microarray technique. Histopathology. 2007;50:472–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02635.x.
    1. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:109–122. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y.
    1. Bourke L, Kirkbride P, Hooper R, Rosario AJ, Chico TJ, Rosario DJ. Endocrine therapy in prostate cancer: time for reappraisal of risks, benefits and cost-effectiveness? Br J Cancer. 2013;108:9–13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.523.
    1. van der Veldt AA, Lubberink M, Mathijssen RH, Loos WJ, Herder GJ, Greuter HN, et al. Toward prediction of efficacy of chemotherapy: a proof of concept study in lung cancer patients using [11C]docetaxel and positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:4163–4173. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3779.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다