Assessing the Pregnancy Protective Impact of Scheduled Nonadherence to a Novel Progestin-Only Pill: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study

Alison Edelman, Agnes Hemon, Mitchell Creinin, Pascale Borensztein, Bruno Scherrer, Anna Glasier, Alison Edelman, Agnes Hemon, Mitchell Creinin, Pascale Borensztein, Bruno Scherrer, Anna Glasier

Abstract

Background: Progestin-only contraceptive pills (POP) are commonly reserved for women with medical comorbidities but in actuality, POPs can be safely used by anyone wanting to prevent pregnancy. This wide safety profile makes them an ideal candidate for being available over the counter without a prescription, but adherence issues may be more common with over-the-counter use. We need a better understanding of the ability of POPs to prevent pregnancy when adherence issues occur in the form of a missed or delayed pill.

Objective: This study aims to determine cervical mucus characteristics following a 6-hour delayed pill intake or after one missed pill as compared to typical daily use of norgestrel 75 mcg.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study assesses the effect of norgestrel 75 mcg (Opill) on cervical mucus and ovarian activity during reported compliant daily use, after a 6-hour delayed intake mid cycle, and after a mid-cycle missed pill. Subject participation will last approximately 4.5 months. We will recruit at 2 US sites: Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon and University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California. Reproductive-aged subjects with regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days), BMI <32 kg/m2, and proven ovulation (screening luteal phase progesterone >3 ng/mL [>10 nmol/L]) are eligible to enroll. Participants cannot be at risk for pregnancy during the study period and not use other hormonal methods. Norgestrel 75 mcg will be taken at the same time daily except for one day in each of treatment periods 2 and 3, when the pill will be taken either 6 hours late (delayed pill) or omitted completely (missed pill). Every 3-4 days, we will monitor subjects for follicular activity with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) examination, cervical mucus, and blood sampling for ovarian hormones and gonadotropins. Subjects will undergo serial cervical mucus sampling on the days with missed and delayed pill intake at 8 hours after pill intake on the day before the delayed or missed pill, 3 hours following the scheduled time of pill intake if intake was delayed, 6 hours after the scheduled time if intake was omitted, and on the next day 30 minutes before the time of scheduled pill intake. The primary objective of the study is to determine the effect of a delayed or omitted pill intake on cervical mucus characteristics based on a modified Insler score compared to reported daily use.

Results: Our protocol was successfully approved by a central institutional review board (Advarra, Columbia, MD), received ethical approval on March 23, 2018, and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585712). As of January 2020, the study completed enrollment of 52 subjects. Analyses are pending.

Conclusions: Our protocol was approved by a central review board, and study procedures were successfully executed with completed proposed enrollment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03585712; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03585712.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/29208.

Keywords: contraception; missed pill; pharmacokinetics; progestin-only pills; protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: AE reports honoraria and travel reimbursement from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the World Health Organization, and Gynuity for committee activities and honoraria for peer review from the Karolinska Institute. AE receives royalties from Up to Date, Inc, and she has acted as a consultant to MedinCELL. Oregon Health & Science University receives research funding from Oregon Health & Science University Foundation, Merck, HRA Pharma, and National Institutes of Health where AE is the principal investigator. AH and PB are employees of HRA Pharma. MC serves on an Advisory Board for Evofem, Mayne, Merck, and Searchlight and is a consultant for Danco, Estetra, Mayne, Medicines360, and Merck. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis Health receives contraceptive research funding, from which MC is supported from HRA Pharma, Medicines360, Merck, and Sebela. BS and AG are regular consultants to HRA Pharma.

©Alison Edelman, Agnes Hemon, Mitchell Creinin, Pascale Borensztein, Bruno Scherrer, Anna Glasier. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.06.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study Procedures. aIf follicle is ≥15mm, then visits are changed to every other day for 3 extra visits; bThree consecutive visits at the time of delayed/missed pill.

References

    1. Kavanaugh ML, Pliskin E, Jerman J. Use of concurrent multiple methods of contraception in the United States, 2008 to 2015. Contracept X. 2021;3:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100060.
    1. US Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC) for Contraceptive Use, 2016. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. [2021-05-18]. .
    1. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Over-the-Counter Access to Hormonal Contraception: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 788. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;134(4):e96–e105. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003473.
    1. White K, Potter JE, Hopkins K, Fernández L, Amastae J, Grossman D. Contraindications to progestin-only oral contraceptive pills among reproductive-aged women. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.008.
    1. Grossman D, Fernandez L, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Garcia SG, Potter JE. Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):572–8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818345f0.
    1. Zapata LB, Steenland MW, Brahmi D, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM. Effect of missed combined hormonal contraceptives on contraceptive effectiveness: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013 May;87(5):685–700. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.035.
    1. Jensen JT, Creinin MD. Speroff & Darney’s Clinical Guide to Contraception. Riverwoods, IL: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2019.
    1. McCann MF, Potter LS. Progestin-only oral contraception: a comprehensive review. Contraception. 1994 Dec;50(6 Suppl 1):S1–195.
    1. Han L, Taub R, Jensen JT. Cervical mucus and contraception: what we know and what we don't. Contraception. 2017 Nov;96(5):310–321. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.168.
    1. US Selected Practice Recommendations (US SPR) for Contraceptive Use, 2016. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. [2021-05-18]. .
    1. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th ed. World Health Organization. 2010. [2021-05-18]. .
    1. Banh C, Rautenberg T, Duijkers I, Borenzstein P, Monteil C, Levy-Gompel D, Klipping C, Scherrer B, Glasier A. The effects on ovarian activity of delaying versus immediately restarting combined oral contraception after missing three pills and taking ulipristal acetate 30 mg. Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.013.
    1. Hoogland HJ, Skouby SO. Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian activity under oral contraceptives. Contraception. 1993 Jun;47(6):583–90. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90025-3.
    1. Proposed WHO guidelines for good clinical practice (‎GCP for trials on pharmaceutical products) WHO drug information. 1992. [2021-05-18]. .
    1. Hochberg I, Orshalimy S, Yom-Tov E. Real-World Evidence on the Effect of Missing an Oral Contraceptive Dose: Analysis of Internet Search Engine Queries. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 15;22(9):e20632. doi: 10.2196/20632.
    1. Potter L, Oakley D, de Leon-Wong E, Cañamar R. Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996;28(4):154–8.
    1. Fox MC, Creinin MD, Murthy AS, Harwood B, Reid LM. Feasibility study of the use of a daily electronic mail reminder to improve oral contraceptive compliance. Contraception. 2003 Nov;68(5):365–71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.08.013.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다