Neoadjuvant PF-05280014 (a potential trastuzumab biosimilar) versus trastuzumab for operable HER2+ breast cancer

Philip E Lammers, Magdolna Dank, Riccardo Masetti, Richat Abbas, Fiona Hilton, Jennifer Coppola, Ira Jacobs, Philip E Lammers, Magdolna Dank, Riccardo Masetti, Richat Abbas, Fiona Hilton, Jennifer Coppola, Ira Jacobs

Abstract

Background: This randomised, double-blind study compared pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-05280014 (potential trastuzumab biosimilar) and trastuzumab reference product (Herceptin) sourced from the European Union (trastuzumab-EU) as neoadjuvant treatment for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer.

Methods: Patients (N = 226), stratified by primary tumour size and hormone receptor status, were randomised 1:1 to PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU (8 mg/kg loading dose; 6 mg/kg thereafter), each with docetaxel and carboplatin, every 3 weeks for six treatment cycles. Primary endpoint was percentage of patients with trough plasma concentration (Ctrough) >20 μg/ml at Cycle 5 (Cycle 6 predose). Efficacy endpoints included pathological complete response and objective response rate. Non-inferiority of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab-EU was declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the stratified difference between groups in the percentage of patients with Cycle 5 Ctrough >20 μg/ml was above the prespecified non-inferiority margin of - 12.5%.

Results: For PF-05280014 vs trastuzumab-EU patients, respectively, 92.1% vs 93.3% had Cycle 5 Ctrough >20 μg/ml; the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (- 8.02%, 6.49%) for the stratified difference between groups was above the non-inferiority margin (- 12.5%). Pathological complete response (47.0% vs 50.0%) and central radiology review-assessed objective response (88.1% vs 82.0%) rates were comparable. Incidence of all-causality, grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events was 38.1% vs 45.5%; antidrug antibody rates were 0% vs 0.89%.

Conclusions: PF-05280014 demonstrated non-inferior pharmacokinetics and comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity to trastuzumab-EU in patients with operable HER2-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02187744.

Conflict of interest statement

Philip E. Lammers has participated on advisory boards with Pfizer Inc. Magdolna Dank has been a member of Biosimilars Oncology European Advisory Board with Pfizer Inc since 2013. Riccardo Masetti declares no conflicts of interest. Richat Abbas, Fiona Hilton, Jennifer Coppola and Ira Jacobs are full time employees of and declare stock holdings and/or stock options from Pfizer Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall study design and disposition of patients. a Study design and b patient disposition. aOn Day 1 Cycle 1, patients received a loading dose (8 mg/kg) of PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU infused over 90 min followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m2; 60-min intravenous infusion) and carboplatin (target AUC: 6; ≥ 15-min intravenous infusion). Subsequent infusions of PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU (6 mg/kg, over 30 to 90 min), docetaxel and carboplatin were administered every 3 weeks for a total of six treatment cycles. bBlood samples were collected predose (−2.5 h to −5 min prior to infusion) on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, and at 1-h post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 for determination of PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU serum concentrations. cThe intent-to-treat population consisted of all patients randomised to PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU. dThe safety population comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. ePatients in the PF-05280014 group were excluded from the per protocol population for the following reasons: Cycle 5 trough sample taken outside protocol-specified window (n = 6, 46.2%), fewer than six cycles of trastuzumab (n = 5, 38.5%), no Cycle 5 trough pharmacokinetic sample (n = 2, 15.4%), and trastuzumab treatment delay > 1 week (n = 1, 7.7%). A patient may have met multiple criteria for exclusion and may have been counted more than once. fPatients in the trastuzumab-EU group were excluded from the per protocol population for the following reasons: Cycle 5 trough sample taken outside protocol-specified window (n = 13, 56.5%), fewer than six cycles of trastuzumab (n = 5, 21.7%), trastuzumab treatment delay > 1 week (n = 3, 13.0%), Cycle 5 trough sample taken post dose (n = 1, 4.3%), no lesion > 2 cm in breast (n = 1, 4.3%), and missing HER2 sample (n = 1, 4.3%). A patient may have met multiple criteria for exclusion and may have been counted more than once. gThe per protocol population consisted of all randomised patients who received six cycles of PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU and had no temporary delays in treatment lasting > 1 week or other significant protocol deviations. AUC = area under the curve; HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; trastuzumab-EU = licensed trastuzumab sourced from the European Union

References

    1. Genentech Inc. Herceptin (trastuzumab) US prescribing information. . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2017).
    1. European Medicines Agency. Herceptin (trastuzumab) summary of product characteristics. . Accessed 13 July 2017 (2013).
    1. Press MF, et al. Her-2/neu expression in node-negative breast cancer: direct tissue quantitation by computerized image analysis and association of overexpression with increased risk of recurrent disease. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4960–4970.
    1. Seshadri R, et al. Clinical significance of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in primary breast cancer. The South Australian Breast Cancer Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 1993;11:1936–1942. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.1936.
    1. Slamon DJ, et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235:177–182. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106.
    1. Wolff AC, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:3997–4013. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984.
    1. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1659–1672. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052306.
    1. Romond EH, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1673–1684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052122.
    1. Slamon D, et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:1273–1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910383.
    1. Slamon DJ, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:783–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101.
    1. Buzdar AU, et al. Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:3676–3685. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.032.
    1. Gianni L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375:377–384. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61964-4.
    1. Cherny N, Sullivan R, Torode J, Saar M, Eniu A. ESMO European Consortium Study on the availability, out-of-pocket costs and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines in Europe. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:1423–1443. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw213.
    1. Lammers P, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G, Jacobs I. Barriers to the use of trastuzumab for HER2+breast cancer and the potential impact of biosimilars: a physician survey in the United States and emerging markets. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2014;7:943–953. doi: 10.3390/ph7090943.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2014).
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. Guidance for industry. . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2015).
    1. World Health Organization. Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs). . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2009).
    1. Hurst S, et al. Comparative nonclinical assessments of the proposed biosimilar PF-05280014 and trastuzumab (Herceptin((R))) BioDrugs. 2014;28:451–459. doi: 10.1007/s40259-014-0103-4.
    1. Yin D, et al. A randomized phase 1 pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar PF-05280014 with trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01) Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014;78:1281–1290. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12464.
    1. Vana AM, et al. Evaluating imbalances of adverse events during biosimilar development. Mabs. 2016;8:861–866. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1171431.
    1. . A study of PF-05280014 [trastuzumab-Pfizer] or Herceptin® [trastuzumab-EU] plus paclitaxel in HER2 positive first line metastatic breast cancer treatment (REFLECTIONS B327-02). . Accessed 22 March 2017 (2013).
    1. . A study of PF-05280014 or trastuzumab plus Taxotere® and carboplatin in HER2 positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting (REFLECTIONS B327-04). . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2014).
    1. EU Clinical Trials Register. A randomized, double-blind pharmacokinetic study of PF-05280014 plus Taxotere and carboplatin versus Herceptin plus Taxotere and carboplatin for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with operable HER2-positve breast cancer. . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2014).
    1. Coudert BP, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: results of the GETN(A)-1 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2678–2684. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9994.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: breast cancer, version 3.2013. . Accessed 11 July 2017 (2015).
    1. Ismael G, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive, clinical stage I-III breast cancer (HannaH study): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:869–878. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70329-7.
    1. Untch M, et al. Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:135–144. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70397-7.
    1. Untch M, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:2024–2031. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8451.
    1. Stebbing J, et al. CT-P6 compared with reference trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 equivalence trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;8:917–928. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30434-5.
    1. Pivot XB, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing SB3 (trastuzumab biosimilar) with originator trastuzumab in patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer [abstract] J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:509. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.509.
    1. Wynne C, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab: a phase I/Ib trial in healthy male volunteers and patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013;53:192–201. doi: 10.1177/0091270012436560.
    1. Isakov L, Jin B, Jacobs IA. Statistical primer on biosimilar clinical development. Am. J. Ther. 2016;23:e1903–e1910. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000391.
    1. Pegram M., et al. (2017) A randomized, double-blind study of PF-05280014 (a potential trastuzumab biosimilar) vs trastuzumab, both in combination with paclitaxel, as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO 2017), Madrid, Spain, 08–12 September 2017.
    1. Denduluri N, et al. Selection of optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer and adjuvant targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancers: an American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:1–12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0182.
    1. Senkus E, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:v8–v30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다