Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Xiaohang Li, Jialin Zhang, Lixuan Sang, Wenliang Zhang, Zhiqiang Chu, Xin Li, Yongfeng Liu, Xiaohang Li, Jialin Zhang, Lixuan Sang, Wenliang Zhang, Zhiqiang Chu, Xin Li, Yongfeng Liu

Abstract

Background: Although laparoscopic surgery has been available for a long time and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed universally, it is still not clear whether open appendectomy (OA) or laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the most appropriate surgical approach to acute appendicitis. The purpose of this work is to compare the therapeutic effects and safety of laparoscopic and conventional "open" appendectomy by means of a meta-analysis.

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared LA and OA in adults and children between 1990 and 2009. Calculations were made of the effect sizes of: operating time, postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, resumption of diet, complications rates, and conversion to open surgery. The effect sizes were then pooled by a fixed or random-effects model.

Results: Forty-four randomized controlled trials with 5292 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Operating time was 12.35 min longer for LA (95% CI: 7.99 to 16.72, p < 0.00001). Hospital stay after LA was 0.60 days shorter (95% CI: -0.85 to -0.36, p < 0.00001). Patients returned to their normal activity 4.52 days earlier after LA (95% CI: -5.95 to -3.10, p < 0.00001), and resumed their diet 0.34 days earlier(95% CI: -0.46 to -0.21, p < 0.00001). Pain after LA on the first postoperative day was significantly less (p = 0.008). The overall conversion rate from LA to OA was 9.51%. With regard to the rate of complications, wound infection after LA was definitely reduced (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.59, p < 0.00001), while postoperative ileus was not significantly reduced(OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.47, p = 0.71). However, intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), intraoperative bleeding and urinary tract infection (UIT) after LA, occurred slightly more frequently(OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.43, p = 0.05; OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.54 to 4.48, p = 0.41; OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 0.58 to 5.29, p = 0.32).

Conclusion: LA provides considerable benefits over OA, including a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain, earlier postoperative recovery, and a lower complication rate. Furthermore, over the study period it was obvious that there had been a trend toward fewer differences in operating time for the two procedures. Although LA was associated with a slight increase in the incidence of IAA, intraoperative bleeding and UIT, it is a safe procedure. It may be that the widespread use of LA is due to its better therapeutic effect.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of studies for inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Inverted funnel plot analysis of the wound infection rate between LA and OA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Inverted funnel plot analysis of the intra-abdominal abscess rate between LA and OA.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Inverted funnel plot analysis of the postoperative ileus rate between LA and OA.

References

    1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–925. (PMID: 2239906)
    1. McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43. doi: 10.1097/00000658-189407000-00004. (PMID: 17860070)
    1. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59–64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021466. (PMID: 6221925)
    1. Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M. Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:245–255. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318058a117. (PMID: 17710043)
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. (PMID: 8721797)
    1. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:982–989. (PMID: 11730399)
    1. Friedman HP, Goldberg JD. Meta-analysis: an introduction and point of view. Hepatology. 1996;23:917–928. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230437. (PMID: 8666350)
    1. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13–22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13. (PMID: 15840177)
    1. Al-Mulhim AS, Al-Mulhim FM, Al-Suwaiygh AA, Al-Masaud NA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in females with a clinical diagnosis of appendicitis. Saudi Med J. 2002;23:1339–1342. (PMID: 12506292)
    1. Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery. 1992;112:497–501. (PMID: 1387739)
    1. Bruwer F, Coetzer M, Warren BL. Laparoscopic versus open surgical exploration in premenopausal women with suspected acute appendicitis. S Afr J Surg. 2003;41:82–85. (PMID: 14768141)
    1. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg. 1996;20:263–266. doi: 10.1007/s002689900041. (PMID: 8661828)
    1. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD, Harrison JB. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725–731. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00017. (PMID: 8203983)
    1. Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg. 1996;20:17–21. doi: 10.1007/s002689900003. (PMID: 8588406)
    1. Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, Sweeney J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg. 1996;39:457–462. (PMID: 8956810)
    1. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1204–1208. doi: 10.1007/s004649900821. (PMID: 9745057)
    1. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyö G, Graffner H, Hallerbäck B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48–53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x. (PMID: 10027359)
    1. Helmy MA. A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in men. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2001;31:555–562. (PMID: 11478454)
    1. Huang MT, Wei PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ. Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11:306–312. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200110000-00004. (PMID: 11668227)
    1. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:334–337. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8927-x. (PMID: 14691696)
    1. Kald A, Kullman E, Anderberg B, Wirén M, Carlsson P, Ringqvist I, Rudberg C. Cost-minimisation analysis of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:579–582. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006497. (PMID: 10433143)
    1. Kaplan M, Salman B, Yilmaz TU, Oguz M. A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study. Acta Chir Belg. 2009;109:356–63. (PMID: 19943593)
    1. Karadayi KT, Turan M, Canbay E, Topcu O, Sen M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: analysis of systemic acute phase responses in a prospective randomized study. Chirurg Gastroenterol. 2003;19:396–400. doi: 10.1159/000076078.
    1. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–450. (PMID: 16135930)
    1. Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:336–340. doi: 10.1007/s004649900358. (PMID: 9094272)
    1. Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Wetscher GJ, Szinicz G. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg. 1998;175:232–235. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00286-9. (PMID: 9560127)
    1. Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR. Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1599–1600. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801236. (PMID: 8298936)
    1. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J. Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:95–97. doi: 10.1007/s004649900305. (PMID: 9069134)
    1. Lavonius MI, Liesjarvi S, Ovaska J, Pajulo O, Ristkari S, Alanen M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a prospective randomised study. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;11:235–238. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17150. (PMID: 11558012)
    1. Lejus C, Delile L, Plattner V, Baron M, Guillou S, Héloury Y, Souron R. Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: effects on postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:801–806. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199604000-00006. (PMID: 8638833)
    1. Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K, Valtonen H, Mattila M, Eskelinen M. The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:34–37. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.1.34. (PMID: 14706955)
    1. Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR. Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:310–317. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30841. (PMID: 11877640)
    1. Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129:390–400. (PMID: 11283528)
    1. Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernández E, Nieto B. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:335–339. doi: 10.1097/00019509-199708000-00016. (PMID: 9282768)
    1. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D. Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg. 1995;222:256–262. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00004. (PMID: 7677456)
    1. Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M. A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1023–1028. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9112-3. (PMID: 12728377)
    1. Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg. 1997;132:708–712. (PMID: 9230853)
    1. Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:298–304. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4842. (PMID: 15609378)
    1. Moirangthem GS, Arunkumar C, Marak AB, Lokendra K, Singh LD. A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. JMS. 2008;22:58–62.
    1. Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J. Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 1996;120:71–74. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80243-1. (PMID: 8693426)
    1. Nordentoft T, Bringstrup FA, Bremmelgaard A, Stage JG. Effect of laparoscopy on bacteremia in acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000;10:302–304. (PMID: 11083213)
    1. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169:203–213. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80138-X. (PMID: 7840381)
    1. Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Kale IT. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999;9:187–189. (PMID: 10803997)
    1. Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Rønning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:200–205. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01652.x. (PMID: 11167866)
    1. Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E, Edwin B, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR. Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:842–847. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840632. (PMID: 9189105)
    1. Ricca R, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with a body mass index of 25 or greater: results of a double blind, prospective, randomized trial. JSLS. 2007;11:54–58. (PMID: 17663093)
    1. Simon P, Burkhardt U, Sack U, Kaisers UX, Muensterer OJ. Inflammatory response is no different in children randomized to laparoscopic or open appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19:S71–6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0155.supp. (PMID: 18999981)
    1. Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 1993;342:633–637. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91757-D. (PMID: 8103144)
    1. Tzovaras G, Liakou P, Baloyiannis I, Spyridakis M, Mantzos F, Tepetes K, Athanassiou E, Hatzitheofilou C. Laparoscopic appendectomy: differences between male and female patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2007;31:409–413. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0335-7. (PMID: 17219281)
    1. Wei Hongbo Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:266–9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.(PMID: 19517167)
    1. Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, Fenoglio ME. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. South Med J. 1996;89:668–674. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199612000-00019. (PMID: 8685751)
    1. Yin WY, Lee MC, Cheng TJ, Chen HT, Huang SM. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Tzu Chi Med J. 1996;8:213–221.
    1. Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, Boris J, Ströberg P, Tronstad SE, Skullman S. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:200–202. doi: 10.1007/s004640000255. (PMID: 11285968)
    1. van Dalen R, Bagshaw PF, Dobbs BR, Robertson GM, Lynch AC, Frizelle FA. The utility of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1311–1313. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8710-4. (PMID: 12739123)
    1. Enochsson L, Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Fenyö G, Gudbjartson T, Kullman E, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S, Wenner J. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in overweight patients. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:387–392. doi: 10.1007/s004640000334. (PMID: 11395821)
    1. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Enochsson L, Gudbjartson T, Wenner J, Kullman E, Fenyö G, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S. Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendicectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique? Eur J Surg. 2001;167:209–213. doi: 10.1080/110241501750099438. (PMID: 11316407)
    1. Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K. Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg. 2001;88:510–514. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01723.x. (PMID: 11298617)
    1. Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K, Antila P, Eskelinen M. Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:1317–1320. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.34998. (PMID: 12194123)
    1. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Adv Surg. 2006;40:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2006.05.001. (PMID: 17163092)
    1. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545–553. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00080-5. (PMID: 9583695)
    1. Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg. 2002;19:518–522. doi: 10.1159/000067608. (PMID: 12499748)
    1. Kim CB, Kim MS, Hong JH, Lee HY, Yu SH. Is laparoscopic appendectomy useful for the treatment of acute appendicitis in Korea? A meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45:7–16. (PMID: 15004862)
    1. Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4909–4914. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4909. (PMID: 18756599)
    1. Grewal H, Sweat J, Vazquez WD. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children can be done as a fast-track or same-day surgery. JSLS. 2004;8:151–154. (PMID: 15119660)
    1. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18:CD001546. (PMID: 15495014)
    1. Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M. Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;4:710–712. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.014. (PMID: 16567181)
    1. Lord RV, Sloane DR. Early discharge after open appendicectomy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66:361–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb01211.x. (PMID: 8678853)
    1. Vernon AH, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:75–79. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8868-9. (PMID: 14625753)
    1. Gupta R, Sample C, Bamehriz F, Birch DW. Infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg. 2006;49:397–400. (PMID: 17234067)
    1. Memon MA. Laparoscopic appendectomy: current status. Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1997;79:393–402. (PMID: 9422862)
    1. Brümmer S, Sohr D, Gastmeier P. Intra-abdominal abscesses and laparoscopic versus open appendectomies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:713–715. doi: 10.1086/598246. (PMID: 19496649)
    1. Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P, Velmahos G, Campos G, Mason R, Mavor E. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:456–461. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00504-3. (PMID: 11182397)

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다