Prospective evaluation of the ability of clinical scoring systems and physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis to obviate the need for CT

Sean K Golden, John B Harringa, Perry J Pickhardt, Alexander Ebinger, James E Svenson, Ying-Qi Zhao, Zhanhai Li, Ryan P Westergaard, William J Ehlenbach, Michael D Repplinger, Sean K Golden, John B Harringa, Perry J Pickhardt, Alexander Ebinger, James E Svenson, Ying-Qi Zhao, Zhanhai Li, Ryan P Westergaard, William J Ehlenbach, Michael D Repplinger

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether clinical scoring systems or physician gestalt can obviate the need for computed tomography (CT) in patients with possible appendicitis.

Methods: Prospective, observational study of patients with abdominal pain at an academic emergency department (ED) from February 2012 to February 2014. Patients over 11 years old who had a CT ordered for possible appendicitis were eligible. All parameters needed to calculate the scores were recorded on standardised forms prior to CT. Physicians also estimated the likelihood of appendicitis. Test characteristics were calculated using clinical follow-up as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn.

Results: Of the 287 patients (mean age (range), 31 (12-88) years; 60% women), the prevalence of appendicitis was 33%. The Alvarado score had a positive likelihood ratio (LR(+)) (95% CI) of 2.2 (1.7 to 3) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR(-)) of 0.6 (0.4 to 0.7). The modified Alvarado score (MAS) had LR(+) 2.4 (1.6 to 3.4) and LR(-) 0.7 (0.6 to 0.8). The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score had LR(+) 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) and LR(-) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.8). Physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis had LR(+) 1.3 (1.2 to 1.5) and LR(-) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.6). When combined with physician likelihoods, LR(+) and LR(-) was 3.67 and 0.48 (Alvarado), 2.33 and 0.45 (RIPASA), and 3.87 and 0.47 (MAS). The area under the curve was highest for physician-determined likelihood (0.72), but was not statistically significantly different from the clinical scores (RIPASA 0.67, Alvarado 0.72, MAS 0.7).

Conclusions: Clinical scoring systems performed equally well as physician gestalt in predicting appendicitis. These scores do not obviate the need for imaging for possible appendicitis when a physician deems it necessary.

Keywords: abdomen- non trauma, gastro-intestinal; clinical assessment, effectiveness; imaging, CT/MRI.

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING INTERESTS

Perry J. Pickhardt, MD has the following financial disclosures: Co-founder, VirtuoCTC and shareholder, Cellectar Biosciences. The other authors have no financial conflicts.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for…
Figure. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for each clinical scoring system and physician impression
Area under the curve (AUC) is also reported. MAS = Modified Alvarado Score; Physician = Physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다