Adolescent intermittent ethanol impairs behavioral flexibility in a rat foraging task in adulthood

Nancy Y A Sey, Alexander Gómez-A, Aric C Madayag, Charlotte A Boettiger, Donita L Robinson, Nancy Y A Sey, Alexander Gómez-A, Aric C Madayag, Charlotte A Boettiger, Donita L Robinson

Abstract

Alcohol exposure is linked to behavioral flexibility deficits in humans, but it is unclear when the critical exposure occurred or if alcohol exposure alone is sufficient to produce behavior deficits. Increasing evidence shows that binge levels of alcohol during adolescence are particularly harmful to the brain, producing physiological and behavioral effects that can persist into adulthood. The present study determined whether adolescent intermittent ethanol (AIE) in rats impaired action selection in a discriminative stimulus task using a foraging response. Rats were exposed to ethanol during adolescence (5 g/kg/day, IG, 2-days-on/2-days-off, postnatal day 25-54). In adulthood, they learned to dig for food reward buried in one of two media, cued with one of two odors. AIE and control rats both learned to discriminate between olfactory cues, but AIE rats were impaired when reversing that learned association (first intra-dimensional reversal). However, AIE rats were faster to reinstate the original odor discrimination rule (second reversal), suggesting perseverative behavior. Next, the reward location was cued by digging media rather than odor. Both groups learned this extra-dimensional shift; however, control rats were slower to reach criterion. These findings are consistent with studies of people with substance abuse disorder, who learn new stimulus-response associations similarly to, or better than, control subjects, but perseverate when attempting to replace a well-learned association. These data suggest that adolescent binge-alcohol exposure contributes to behavioral flexibility deficits observed in adulthood.

Keywords: Adolescence; Alcohol; Habit; Reversal; Set shift; Stimulus response.

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: none.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Discrimination of an odor cue was not statistically different between AIE-exposed and control rats. Symbols depict data from individual female (grey) and male (black) rats; bars depict the mean ± SEM number of trials to reach criterion on Day 6.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adolescent intermittent ethanol (AIE) exposure impaired performance on the first reversal (Rev1) and facilitated performance of the second reversal (Rev2) compared to water exposure (CON). (A) AIE and CON rats required similar number of trials to reach criterion on task reacquisition, but AIE rats required more trials to reach criteria than CON rats on Rev1. (B) AIE rats exhibited more prepotent errors compared to controls on Rev1, (C) but regressive errors were similar between groups. (D) AIE rats required fewer trials than CON rats to complete Rev2, returning to the original rule. (E) In Rev2, prepotent errors were similar between groups, (F) but AIE rats made fewer regressive errors than CON rats. Symbols/bars are as Figure 1. @ p<0.05 versus reacquisition phase within-group; # p<0.05 and ## p<0.01 versus controls.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Control (CON) rats required more trials to reach criterion for extra-dimensional set shift compared to adolescent intermittent ethanol (AIE)-exposed rats. Symbols/bars are as Figure 1. @ p<0.05 versus reacquisition phase within-group; # p<0.05 versus controls.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다