Selumetinib Plus Docetaxel Compared With Docetaxel Alone and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With KRAS-Mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The SELECT-1 Randomized Clinical Trial
Pasi A Jänne, Michel M van den Heuvel, Fabrice Barlesi, Manuel Cobo, Julien Mazieres, Lucio Crinò, Sergey Orlov, Fiona Blackhall, Juergen Wolf, Pilar Garrido, Artem Poltoratskiy, Gabriella Mariani, Dana Ghiorghiu, Elaine Kilgour, Paul Smith, Alexander Kohlmann, David J Carlile, David Lawrence, Karin Bowen, Johan Vansteenkiste, Pasi A Jänne, Michel M van den Heuvel, Fabrice Barlesi, Manuel Cobo, Julien Mazieres, Lucio Crinò, Sergey Orlov, Fiona Blackhall, Juergen Wolf, Pilar Garrido, Artem Poltoratskiy, Gabriella Mariani, Dana Ghiorghiu, Elaine Kilgour, Paul Smith, Alexander Kohlmann, David J Carlile, David Lawrence, Karin Bowen, Johan Vansteenkiste
Abstract
Importance: There are no specifically approved targeted therapies for the most common genomically defined subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), KRAS-mutant lung cancer.
Objective: To compare efficacy of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor selumetinib + docetaxel with docetaxel alone as a second-line therapy for advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC.
Design, setting, and participants: Multinational, randomized clinical trial conducted at 202 sites across 25 countries from October 2013 through January 2016. Of 3323 patients with advanced NSCLC and disease progression following first-line anticancer therapy tested for a KRAS mutation, 866 were enrolled and 510 randomized. Primary reason for exclusion was ineligibility. The data cutoff date for analysis was June 7, 2016.
Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1; 254 to receive selumetinib + docetaxel and 256 to receive placebo + docetaxel.
Main outcomes and measures: Primary end point was investigator assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, effects on disease-related symptoms, safety, and tolerability.
Results: Of 510 randomized patients (mean age, 61.4 years [SD, 8.3]; women, 207 [41%]), 505 patients (99%) received treatment and completed the study (251 received selumetinib + docetaxel; 254 received placebo + docetaxel). At the time of data cutoff, 447 patients (88%) had experienced a progression event and 346 deaths (68%) had occurred. Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-5.9) with selumetinib + docetaxel and 2.8 months (IQR, 1.4-5.5) with placebo + docetaxel (difference, 1.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77-1.12]; P = .44). Median overall survival was 8.7 months (IQR, 3.6-16.8) with selumetinib + docetaxel and 7.9 months (IQR, 3.8-20.1) with placebo + docetaxel (difference, 0.9 months; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.85-1.30]; P = .64). Objective response rate was 20.1% with selumetinib + docetaxel and 13.7% with placebo + docetaxel (difference, 6.4%; odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.00-2.62]; P = .05). Median duration of response was 2.9 months (IQR, 1.7-4.8; 95% CI, 2.7-4.1) with selumetinib + docetaxel and 4.5 months (IQR, 2.3-7.3; 95% CI, 2.8-5.6) with placebo + docetaxel. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were more frequent with selumetinib + docetaxel (169 adverse events [67%] for selumetinib + docetaxel vs 115 adverse events [45%] for placebo + docetaxel; difference, 22%).
Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with previously treated advanced KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, addition of selumetinib to docetaxel did not improve progression-free survival compared with docetaxel alone.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01933932.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Jänne reports receiving personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Genentech/Roche, Chugai, Merrimack, Ignyta, LOXO Oncology, and ACEA Biosciences; grant funding from Puma Biotechnology and Astellas; being a shareholder of Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals and LOXO Oncology; and receiving postmarketing royalties from a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute–owned patent on EGFR mutation licensed to Lab Corp. Dr Barlesi reports receiving consultancy fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, and Pfizer and payment for lectures including service on speaker bureaus from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Pfizer. Dr Wolf reports receiving board membership fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Clovis Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, and grants from Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Dr Garrido reports receiving personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Boehringer-Ingelheim and grant funding from Boehringer-Ingelheim.
Figures
Source: PubMed