Membranous nephropathy: Pilot study of a novel regimen combining cyclosporine and Rituximab

Meryl Waldman, Laurence H Beck Jr, Michelle Braun, Kenneth Wilkins, James E Balow, Howard A Austin 3rd, Meryl Waldman, Laurence H Beck Jr, Michelle Braun, Kenneth Wilkins, James E Balow, Howard A Austin 3rd

Abstract

Introduction: There is broad consensus that high grade basal proteinuria and failure to achieve remission of proteinuria are key determinants of adverse renal prognosis in patients with primary membranous nephropathy. Based on the fact that current regimens are not ideal due to short and long-term toxicity and propensity to relapse after treatment withdrawal, we developed a treatment protocol based on a novel combination of rituximab and cyclosporine which targets both the B and T cell limbs of the immune system. Herein, we report pilot study data on proteinuria, changes in autoantibody levels and renal function that offer a potentially effective new approach to treatment of severe membranous nephropathy.

Methods: Thirteen high-risk patients defined by sustained high-grade proteinuria (mean 10.8 g/d) received combination induction therapy with rituximab plus cyclosporine for 6 months, followed by a second cycle of rituximab and tapering of cyclosporine during an 18 month maintenance phase.

Results: Mean proteinuria decreased by 65% at 3 months and by 80% at 6 months. Combined complete or partial remission was achieved in 92% of patients by 9 months; 54% achieved complete remission at 12 months. Two patients relapsed during the trial. All patients with autoantibodies to PLA2R achieved antibody depletion. Renal function stabilized. The regimen was well tolerated.

Discussion: We report these encouraging preliminary results for their potential value to other investigators needing prospectively collected data to inform the design and power calculations of future randomized clinical trials. Such trials will be needed to formally compare this novel regimen to current therapies for membranous nephropathy.

Keywords: Membranous nephropathy; cyclosporine; nephrotic syndrome; rituximab.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots of urinary protein excretion from time of diagnosis (biopsy) to study initiation/enrollment (time 0) to 24 months. Proteinuria increased during the observation phase (from diagnostic biopsy to time 0). After initiation of therapy, there was a rapid reduction in proteinuria within 3 months. The top and bottom of the box are the estimated 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The horizontal lines and “+” signs within each box represent the median and mean values, respectively. The vertical dashes denote the largest as well as the smallest data point that is within 1.5 times the interquartile range (75th to 25th percentile) above the 75th percentile or below the 25th; data points outside of this range are denoted by open circles. After relapse, patients were treated off protocol. Outcomes and efficacy data of relapsed patients from that point forward were not included in the analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots showing changes in eGFR (CKD-EPI) from the time of diagnosis (biopsy) to study initiation/enrollment (time 0) to 24 months. Estimates of changes in eGFR over various intervals are based on mixed-effects models. During the observation phase (defined as time from biopsy to start of study drugs at time 0), there was a decline in renal function; the slope of decline in eGFR was –1.89 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per month. Initiation of induction therapy was associated with further decline in renal function that improved as cyclosporine was tapered and discontinued during the maintenance phase (starting at month 7). The change in eGFR during the induction phase was 4.07 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and +11.92 ml/min per 1.73 m2 during the maintenance phase (7–24 months). By 24 months, there was improvement in renal function compared to enrollment (time 0) values. The top and bottom of the box are the estimated 75th and 25th percentiles. The horizontal lines and “+” signs within each box represent the median and mean values, respectively. The vertical dashes denote the largest as well as the smallest data point that is within 1.5 times the interquartile range (75th to 25th percentile) above the 75th percentile or below the 25th; data points outside of this range are denoted by open circles. P values compare 0 versus 6 months, 6 months versus 24 months, and 0 versus 24 months.

References

    1. Glassock R.J. The pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 50-year odyssey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:157–167.
    1. Ronco P., Debiec H. Pathophysiological advances in membranous nephropathy: time for a shift in patient's care. Lancet. 2015;385:1983–1992.
    1. Glassock R.J. Diagnosis and natural course of membranous nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2003;23:324–332.
    1. Polanco N., Gutierrez E., Rivera F. Spontaneous remission of nephrotic syndrome in membranous nephropathy with chronic renal impairment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:231–234.
    1. Polanco N., Gutierrez E., Covarsi A. Spontaneous remission of nephrotic syndrome in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:697–704.
    1. Cattran D. Management of membranous nephropathy: when and what for treatment. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1188–1194.
    1. Cattran D.C., Pei Y., Greenwood C.M. Validation of a predictive model of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: its clinical and research implications. Kidney Int. 1997;51:901–907.
    1. Pei Y., Cattran D., Greenwood C. Predicting chronic renal insufficiency in idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 1992;42:960–966.
    1. Beck L., Bomback A.S., Choi M.J. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62:403–441.
    1. Howman A., Chapman T.L., Langdon M.M. Immunosuppression for progressive membranous nephropathy: a UK randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381:744–751.
    1. van den Brand J.A., van Dijk P.R., Hofstra J.M., Wetzels J.F. Cancer risk after cyclophosphamide treatment in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1066–1073.
    1. Faurschou M., Sorensen I.J., Mellemkjaer L. Malignancies in Wegener's granulomatosis: incidence and relation to cyclophosphamide therapy in a cohort of 293 patients. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:100–105.
    1. Cattran D.C., Appel G.B., Hebert L.A. Cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant membranous nephropathy: a randomized trial. Kidney Int. 2001;59:1484–1490.
    1. Praga M., Barrio V., Juarez G.F., Luno J. Tacrolimus monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int. 2007;71:924–930.
    1. Naumovic R., Jovanovic D., Pavlovic S. Cyclosporine versus azathioprine therapy in high-risk idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients: a 3-year prospective study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2011;65:105–110.
    1. Chen M., Li H., Li X.Y. Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in treatment of nephrotic idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Med Sci. 2010;339:233–238.
    1. Beck L.H., Jr., Bonegio R.G., Lambeau G. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:11–21.
    1. Murtas C., Bruschi M., Candiano G. Coexistence of different circulating anti-podocyte antibodies in membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:1394–1400.
    1. Tomas N.M., Beck L.H., Jr., Meyer-Schwesinger C. Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2277–2287.
    1. Remuzzi G., Chiurchiu C., Abbate M. Rituximab for idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Lancet. 2002;360:923–924.
    1. Ruggenenti P., Chiurchiu C., Brusegan V. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a one-year prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:1851–1857.
    1. Fervenza F.C., Cosio F.G., Erickson S.B. Rituximab treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2008;73:117–125.
    1. Fervenza F.C., Abraham R.S., Erickson S.B. Rituximab therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 2-year study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2188–2198.
    1. Segarra A., Praga M., Ramos N. Successful treatment of membranous glomerulonephritis with rituximab in calcineurin inhibitor-dependent patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1083–1088.
    1. Levey A.S., Stevens L.A., Schmid C.H. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612.
    1. Schreiber S.L., Crabtree G.R. The mechanism of action of cyclosporin A and FK506. Immunol Today. 1992;13:136–142.
    1. Faul C., Donnelly M., Merscher-Gomez S. The actin cytoskeleton of kidney podocytes is a direct target of the antiproteinuric effect of cyclosporine A. Nat Med. 2008;14:931–938.
    1. Maloney D.G. Anti-CD20 antibody therapy for B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2008–2016.
    1. Reiser J., Fornoni A. Rituximab: a boot to protect the foot. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:647–648.
    1. Fornoni A., Sageshima J., Wei C. Rituximab targets podocytes in recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Science Transl Med. 2011;3 85ra46.
    1. Troyanov S., Wall C.A., Miller J.A. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: definition and relevance of a partial remission. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1199–1205.
    1. Lionaki S., Derebail V.K., Hogan S.L. Venous thromboembolism in patients with membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:43–51.
    1. Barbour S.J., Greenwald A., Djurdjev O. Disease-specific risk of venous thromboembolic events is increased in idiopathic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2012;81:190–195.
    1. Lee T., Biddle A.K., Lionaki S. Personalized prophylactic anticoagulation decision analysis in patients with membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2014;85:1412–1420.
    1. Brodsky S.V., Nadasdy T., Rovin B.H. Warfarin-related nephropathy occurs in patients with and without chronic kidney disease and is associated with an increased mortality rate. Kidney Int. 2011;80:181–189.
    1. Bech A.P., Hofstra J.M., Brenchley P.E., Wetzels J.F. Association of anti-PLA(2)R antibodies with outcomes after immunosuppressive therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1386–1392.
    1. Kanigicherla D., Gummadova J., McKenzie E.A. Anti-PLA2R antibodies measured by ELISA predict long-term outcome in a prevalent population of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2013;83:940–948.
    1. Beck L.H., Jr., Fervenza F.C., Beck D.M. Rituximab-induced depletion of anti-PLA2R autoantibodies predicts response in membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1543–1550.
    1. Hofstra J.M., Debiec H., Short C.D. Antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody titer and subclass in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1735–1743.
    1. Hoxha E., Thiele I., Zahner G. Phospholipase A2 receptor autoantibodies and clinical outcome in patients with primary membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:1357–1366.
    1. Ruggenenti P., Debiec H., Ruggiero B. Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody titer predicts post-rituximab outcome of membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2545–2558.
    1. Hoxha E., Harendza S., Zahner G. An immunofluorescence test for phospholipase-A-receptor antibodies and its clinical usefulness in patients with membranous glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:2526–2532.
    1. Cattran D.C., Greenwood C., Ritchie S. A controlled trial of cyclosporine in patients with progressive membranous nephropathy. Canadian Glomerulonephritis Study Group. Kidney Int. 1995;47:1130–1135.
    1. Pisoni R., Grinyo J.M., Salvadori M. Cyclosporine versus conservative therapy in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and deteriorating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11 0514A (abstract)
    1. Caro J., Gutierrez-Solis E., Rojas-Rivera J. Predictors of response and relapse in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy treated with tacrolimus. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:467–474.
    1. Cravedi P., Sghirlanzoni M.C., Marasa M. Efficacy and safety of rituximab second-line therapy for membranous nephropathy: a prospective, matched-cohort study. Am J Nephrol. 2011;33:461–468.
    1. Ruggenenti P., Cravedi P., Chianca A. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1416–1425.
    1. Ponticelli C., Zucchelli P., Passerini P. A randomized trial of methylprednisolone and chlorambucil in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:8–13.
    1. Ponticelli C., Zucchelli P., Passerini P. A 10-year follow-up of a randomized study with methylprednisolone and chlorambucil in membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 1995;48:1600–1604.
    1. Ponticelli C., Altieri P., Scolari F. A randomized study comparing methylprednisolone plus chlorambucil versus methylprednisolone plus cyclophosphamide in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:444–450.
    1. Jha V., Ganguli A., Saha T.K. A randomized, controlled trial of steroids and cyclophosphamide in adults with nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1899–1904.
    1. du Buf-Vereijken P.W., Branten A.J., Wetzels J.F. Cytotoxic therapy for membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency: improved renal survival but high relapse rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:1142–1148.
    1. Chan T.M., Lin A.W., Tang S.C. Prospective controlled study on mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone in the treatment of membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome. Nephrology (Carlton) 2007;12:576–581.
    1. Branten A.J., du Buf-Vereijken P.W., Vervloet M., Wetzels J.F. Mycophenolate mofetil in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a clinical trial with comparison to a historic control group treated with cyclophosphamide. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50:248–256.
    1. Dussol B., Morange S., Burtey S. Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:699–705.
    1. Ponticelli C., Passerini P., Salvadori M. A randomized pilot trial comparing methylprednisolone plus a cytotoxic agent versus synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47:233–240.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다