Family Care Rituals in the ICU to Reduce Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Family Members-A Multicenter, Multinational, Before-and-After Intervention Trial

Timothy H Amass, Gianluca Villa, Sean OMahony, James M Badger, Rory McFadden, Thomas Walsh, Tanis Caine, Don McGuirl, Amy Palmisciano, Mei-Ean Yeow, Raffaele De Gaudio, J Randall Curtis, Mitchell M Levy, Timothy H Amass, Gianluca Villa, Sean OMahony, James M Badger, Rory McFadden, Thomas Walsh, Tanis Caine, Don McGuirl, Amy Palmisciano, Mei-Ean Yeow, Raffaele De Gaudio, J Randall Curtis, Mitchell M Levy

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of implementing "Family Care Rituals" as a means of engaging family members in the care of patients admitted to the ICU with a high risk of ICU mortality on outcomes including stress-related symptoms in family members.

Design: Prospective, before-and-after intervention evaluation.

Setting: Two U.S. academic medical ICU's, and one Italian academic medical/surgical ICU.

Subjects: Family members of patients who had an attending predicted ICU mortality of greater than 30% within the first 24 hours of admission.

Interventions: A novel intervention titled "Family Care Rituals" during which, following a baseline observation period, family members enrolled in the intervention phase were given an informational booklet outlining opportunities for engagement in care of the patient during their ICU stay.

Measurements and main results: Primary outcome was symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in family members 90 days after patient death or ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included symptoms of depression, anxiety, and family satisfaction. At 90-day follow-up, 131 of 226 family members (58.0%) responded preintervention and 129 of 226 family members (57.1%) responded postintervention. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder were significantly higher preintervention than postintervention (39.2% vs 27.1%; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.58; p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in symptoms of depression (26.5% vs 25.2%; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.93; p = 0.818), anxiety (41.0% vs 45.5%; unadjusted odds ratio, 1.20; p = 0.234), or mean satisfaction scores (85.1 vs 89.0; unadjusted odds ratio, 3.85; p = 0.052) preintervention versus postintervention 90 days after patient death or ICU discharge.

Conclusions: Offering opportunities such as family care rituals for family members to be involved with providing care for family members in the ICU was associated with reduced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. This intervention may lessen the burden of stress-related symptoms in family members of ICU patients.

Conflict of interest statement

The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1–. Family Care Rituals Domains and…
Figure 1–. Family Care Rituals Domains and Suggested Options-
7 domains of family care rituals with suggested options for engagement within each domain
Figure 2–. Screening and Follow Up-
Figure 2–. Screening and Follow Up-
Flow diagram for usual care and intervention screening and enrollment, including reasons for exclusion and those included for final analysis
Figure 3–. Nursing Recorded Observations of Family…
Figure 3–. Nursing Recorded Observations of Family Engagement, by Domain-
nursing recorded frequency (%) of family participation in bedside care by domain, comparing usual care to intervention phase.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다