A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial

Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Luca Testa, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez, Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios, Maria Emfietzoglou, Roberto Scarsini, Francesco Bedogni, Ernest Spitzer, Adrian Banning, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Luca Testa, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez, Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios, Maria Emfietzoglou, Roberto Scarsini, Francesco Bedogni, Ernest Spitzer, Adrian Banning

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used increasingly for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Observational studies and subgroup analyses from clinical trials, have suggested a possible benefit from the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance when performing unprotected LMCA PCI. However, the value of imaging with IVUS has never been proven in an appropriately powered randomized clinical trial. The OPtimizaTIon of Left MAin PCI With IntravascuLar Ultrasound (OPTIMAL) trial has been designed to establish whether IVUS-guided PCI optimization on LMCA is associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared with standard qualitative angiography-guided PCI.

Methods: The OPTIMAL trial is a randomized, multicenter, international study designed to enroll a total of 800 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCA disease. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to IVUS-guided PCI versus angiogram-guided PCI. In patients allocated to the angiogram-guided arm, use of IVUS is discouraged, unless there are safety concerns. In patients allocated to the IVUS guidance arm, pre-procedural IVUS assessment is highly recommended, whilst post-procedural IVUS assessment is mandatory to confirm appropriate stenting result and/or to guide stent result optimization, according to predefined criteria. Patients will be followed up to 2 years after the index procedure. The primary outcome measure is the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) which includes all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization at 2 years follow-up.

Discussion: The OPTIMAL trial aims to provide definitive evidence about the clinical impact of IVUS-guidance during PCI to an unprotected LMCA. It is anticipated by the investigators, that an IVUS-guided strategy will be associated with less clinical events compared to a strategy guided by angiogram alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04111770. Registered on October 1, 2019.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr De Maria reports speaker fees from Miracor Medical SA and research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr Testa reports fees as medical proctor for Boston Scientific, Meril, Concept Medical, Abbott, Philips and advisory board member and/or speaker fees and/or institutional research grant from Boston Scientific, Philips, Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, Concept Medical. Dr de la Torre Hernandez reports receipt of grants/research supports from Abbott Medical, Biosensors, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen and receipt of honoraria or consultation fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Bedogni reports fees as medical proctor for BSCI, Meril, Medtronic, Terumo and advisory board member and/or speaker fees and/or institutional research grant from Boston Scientific, Philips, Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, Concept Medical. Prof Banning reports institutional grant for fellowship form Boston and speaker fees Boston, Phillips and Miracor Medical SA. Dr Spitzer declares that the sponsor of the study is the European Cardiovascular Research Institute (ECRI), in which he is a board member, and the research organization executing the study is Cardialysis, in which he is the chief medical officer. Dr Scarsini, Dr Terentes-Printzios, Dr Emfietzoglou have no conflict of interest to declare. In specific relationship with the study funders: • Boston Scientific has provided research grant support to Dr Testa, Dr Bedogni and Prof Banning • Boston Scientific has provided speaker fees/consultancy fees/proctor fees to Dr Testa, Dr de la Torre Hernandez, Dr Bedogni and Prof Banning • Philips has provided research grant support to Dr De Maria, Dr Testa and Dr Bedogni • Philips has provided speaker fees/consultancy fees/proctor fees to Dr Testa, Dr Bedogni and Prof Banning We confirm that: “This does not alter investigators’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.”

Figures

Fig 1. Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and…
Fig 1. Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments.
(PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; ECG: electrocardiogram; IVUS: intravascular ultrasound).
Fig 2. Flow diagram showing patient inclusion,…
Fig 2. Flow diagram showing patient inclusion, randomization and follow-up in the OPTIMAL trial.
(IVUS: intravascular ultrasound; LAD: left anterior descending; LCx: left circumflex; LM: left main; MI: myocardial infarction; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; SAE: serious adverse event; ULMCA: unprotected left main coronary artery).
Fig 3. Example of IVUS-guided stent optimization…
Fig 3. Example of IVUS-guided stent optimization following the OPTIMAL-optimization criteria.
Before optimization, IVUS showed stent underexpansion at the ostium of the LAD (stent area 5.42 mm2 [target > 6 mm2]), at the ostium of the LCx (stent area 4.90 mm2 [target > 5 mm2]) and in the proximal LCx (minimum stent area 4.74 mm2 [target > 5 mm2] accounting for 69.8% of the distal reference area [target > 90%]) (Red boxes in the upper half of the figure). Further postdilation on the LAD and LCx was performed, completing with FKI and final POT. After optimization, IVUS confirmed achievement of stent expansion targets in all segments, including those who appeared initially suboptimally expanded (Green boxes in lowed half of the figure). (LAD: left anterior descending; LCx: left circumflex; LMCA: left main coronary artery; MSA: minimal stent area; PB: plaque burden; POC: polygon of convergence; SA: stent area).

References

    1. Giannoglou GD, Antoniadis AP, Chatzizisis YS, Damvopoulou E, Parcharidis GE, Louridas GE. Prevalence of narrowing >or = 50% of the left main coronary artery among 17,300 patients having coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(9):1202–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.052
    1. Lefevre T, Girasis C, Lassen JF. Differences between the left main and other bifurcations. EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V106–10. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA24
    1. Makikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, et al.. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10061):2743–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9
    1. Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Simonton CA, Genereux P, Puskas J, et al.. Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2223–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227
    1. Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Pocock SJ, Morice MC, Puskas J, et al.. Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1820–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406
    1. Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Arnold AD, Cook CM, Prasad M, Ali ZA, et al.. Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(34):3228–35. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa135
    1. Terentes-Printzios D, Kotronias RA, De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP. Long-term outcomes in the management of left main disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021;62(1):87–8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.04.006
    1. Thuijs D, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Morice MC, Mack MJ, et al.. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1325–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X
    1. Park DW, Ahn JM, Park H, Yun SC, Kang DY, Lee PH, et al.. Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial. Circulation. 2020;141(18):1437–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046039
    1. De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP. Management of Calcific Coronary Artery Lesions: Is it Time to Change Our Interventional Therapeutic Approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(15):1465–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.038
    1. De Maria GL, Banning AP. Use of Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Treat Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Interv Cardiol. 2017;12(1):8–12. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:1:3
    1. Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004;110(18):2831–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146338.62813.E7
    1. de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, et al.. Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(4):351–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064
    1. Mintz GS, Lefevre T, Lassen JF, Testa L, Pan M, Singh J, et al.. Intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(4):e467–e74. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00194
    1. Fassa AA, Wagatsuma K, Higano ST, Mathew V, Barsness GW, Lennon RJ, et al.. Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(2):204–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.066
    1. Oviedo C, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Araki H, Choi SY, Tsujita K, et al.. Intravascular ultrasound classification of plaque distribution in left main coronary artery bifurcations: where is the plaque really located? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(2):105–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.906016
    1. Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Oh JH, Park DW, et al.. Changes in left main bifurcation geometry after a single-stent crossover technique: an intravascular ultrasound study using direct imaging of both the left anterior descending and the left circumflex coronary arteries before and after intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(4):355–61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.961045
    1. Escaned J, Collet C, Ryan N, De Maria GL, Walsh S, Sabate M, et al.. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(42):3124–34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512
    1. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Song HG, Kim WJ, Park DW, et al.. Intravascular ultrasound-derived predictors for fractional flow reserve in intermediate left main disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(11):1168–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.009
    1. Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Banning AP, Lefevre T, Darremont O, Hildick-Smith D, et al.. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;13(13):1540–53. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00622
    1. Rusinova RP, Mintz GS, Choi SY, Araki H, Hakim D, Sanidas E, et al.. Intravascular ultrasound comparison of left main coronary artery disease between white and Asian patients. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(7):979–84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.014
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al.. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
    1. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim WJ, Suh J, et al.. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(3):167–77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799494
    1. de la Torre Hernandez JM, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez Hospital JA, Alfonso Manterola F, Garcia Camarero T, Gimeno de Carlos F, et al.. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(3):244–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.014
    1. Ladwiniec A, Walsh SJ, Holm NR, Hanratty CG, Makikallio T, Kellerth T, et al.. Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(3):201–9. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01003
    1. de la Torre Hernandez JM, Garcia Camarero T, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez-Hospital JA, Veiga Fernandez G, Lee Hwang DH, et al.. Outcomes of predefined optimisation criteria for intravascular ultrasound guidance of left main stenting. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(3):210–7. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01057
    1. Gao XF, Kan J, Zhang YJ, Zhang JJ, Tian NL, Ye F, et al.. Comparison of one-year clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents for left main lesions: a single-center analysis of a 1,016-patient cohort. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:1299–309. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S65768
    1. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, et al.. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289
    1. Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989;80(2):410–4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.2.410
    1. Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976;54(3):522–3.
    1. Spitzer E, McFadden E, Vranckx P, de Vries T, Ren B, Collet C, et al.. Defining Staged Procedures for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trials: A Guidance Document. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):823–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.044
    1. Raber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, Johnson TW, Holm NR, Onuma Y, et al.. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(35):3281–300. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285
    1. Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, et al.. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):27–36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25135
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al.. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Glob Heart. 2018;13(4):305–38. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.08.004
    1. Testa L, Latib A, Bollati M, Antonio Montone R, Colombo A, Crea F, et al.. Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179060
    1. Ye Y, Yang M, Zhang S, Zeng Y. Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease with or without intravascular ultrasound: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179756
    1. Spitzer E, McFadden E, Vranckx P, Garcia-Garcia HM, Seltzer JH, Held C, et al.. Critical Appraisal of Contemporary Clinical Endpoint Definitions in Coronary Intervention Trials: A Guidance Document. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(9):805–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.031
    1. Ltd SE. Power calculator for binary outcome superiority trial. 2012. [Available from: .
    1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al.. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e574–651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ba622

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다