The Association between Early Artificial Amniotomy and Chorioamnionitis in Nulliparous Induction of Labor

Laura G Cooney, Jamie A Bastek, Laura G Cooney, Jamie A Bastek

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate whether early artificial amniotomy (AROM) <4 cm in nulliparous women admitted for induction of labor was associated with an increased rate of chorioamnionitis and cesarean section or a decreased time to vaginal delivery. Study Design. A retrospective cohort study was performed on nulliparous women with a term, singleton gestation and intact membranes who presented for induction of labor (January 2008 to December 2011). Chorioamnionitis was defined using ICD9 codes. Results. 1,567 women were enrolled; 25.4% underwent early AROM. Overall, the prevalence of chorioamnionitis was 12.4%, the rate of cesarean section was 32.2%, and the time from 4 cm cervical dilation to vaginal delivery was 413 min. Compared to women without AROM < 4 cm, early AROM did not affect overall chorioamnionitis rates (10.2 versus 13.2%, P = 0.12) but was associated with an increased cesarean section rate (40.2 versus 29.5%, P < 0.001). However, among those who delivered vaginally, AROM < 4 cm decreased the rate of chorioamnionitis (8.4 versus 14.6%, P = 0.01), which persisted when controlling for potential confounders (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92), and decreased the time from 4 cm dilation to vaginal delivery (329 versus 472 min, P < 0.001). Conclusions. Our findings do not suggest that early AROM is associated with an increased rate of clinical chorioamnionitis.

References

    1. Martin J. A., Hamilton B. E., Ventura S. J., Osterman M. J. K., Wilson E. C., Mathews T. J. Births: final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2012;61(1):1–72.
    1. Caughey A. B., Sundaram V., Kaimal A. J., et al. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment no. 176. (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidenced-Based Practice Center under Contract no. 290-02-0017) Rockville, Md, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
    1. O'Driscoll K., Foley M., MacDonald D. Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1984;63(4):485–490.
    1. Fraser W. D., Sauve R., Parboosingh I. J., Fung T., Sokol R., Persaud D. A randomized controlled trial of early amniotomy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1991;98(1):84–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10316.x.
    1. Fraser W. D., Marcoux S., Moutquin J.-M., Christen A. Effect of early amniotomy on the risk of dystocia in nulliparous women. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1993;328(16):1145–1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304223281602.
    1. The UK Amniotomy Group. A multicenter randomized trial of amniotomy in spontaneous first labour at term. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1994;101(4):307–309.
    1. Garite T. J., Porto M., Carlson N. J., Rumney P. J., Reimbold P. A. The influence of elective amniotomy on fetal heart rate patterns and the course of labor in term patients: a randomized study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993;168(6):1827–1832. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90697-H.
    1. MacOnes G. A., Cahill A., Stamilio D. M., Odibo A. O. The efficacy of early amniotomy in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;207(5):403.e1–403.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.032.
    1. Gagnon-Gervais K., Bujold E., Iglesias M.-H., et al. Early versus late amniotomy for labour induction: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2012;25(11):2326–2329. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.695819.
    1. Levy R., Ferber A., Ben-Arie A., et al. A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. BJOG. 2002;109(2):168–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01137.x.
    1. Mercer B. M., McNanley T., O'Brien J. M., Randal L., Sibai B. M. Early versus late amniotomy for labor induction: a randomized trial. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1995;173(4):1321–1325. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91379-3.
    1. Newton E. R. Chorioamnionitis and intraamniotic infection. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993;36(4):795–808. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199312000-00004.
    1. Shatrov J. G., Birch S. C. M., Lam L. T., Quinlivan J. A., McIntyre S., Mendz G. L. Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;116(2):387–392. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e90046.
    1. Seaward P. G., Hannah M. E., Myhr T. L., et al. International multicentre term prelabor rupture of membranes study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997;177(5):1024–1029. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70007-3.
    1. Tran S. H., Cheng Y. W., Kaimal A. J., Caughey A. B. Length of rupture of membranes in the setting of premature rupture of membranes at term and infectious maternal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;198(6):700.e1–700.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.031.
    1. Friedman E. A. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1955;6(6):567–589.
    1. Zhang J., Troendle J. F., Yancey M. K. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. The American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002;187(4):824–828.
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 485: prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;117(4):1019–1027. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318219229b.
    1. Kessous R., Weintraub A. Y., Sergienko R., et al. Bacteruria with group-B streptococcus: is it a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2012;25(10):1983–1986. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.671872.
    1. Harper L. M., Shanks A. L., Tuuli M. G., Roehl K. A., Cahill A. G. The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013;209(1):38.e1–38.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.001.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다