Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Video-Based Treatment Options for Basal Cell Carcinoma

13 augustus 2015 bijgewerkt door: Suephy Chen, MD, Emory University

The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Using Video-Based Treatment Option Education Medium for Basal Cell Carcinoma Patients

The purpose of this study is to determine if presenting treatment options to basal cell carcinoma patients in video format will improve efficiency and allow patients to receive consistent, comprehensive, visually-depicted treatment option information to improve patient quality of care. Patients can learn more about treatment options as they are depicted visually so as to better assist them in understanding treatment risks and benefits to confidently make a well-informed decision. Primarily, the study will evaluate efficiency when using the education video medium. The study will also evaluate the effectiveness of the video medium as an aid to decision making in addition to standard of care in comparison to the standard of care alone. Additionally, the study will evaluate both patients' and dermatologists' satisfaction of the educational intervention.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Currently, verbal consultation is the widespread practice in presenting treatment options for basal cell carcinoma patients. This method, although personable and direct, is often incomplete and subject to variability.

The Emory Department of Dermatology has created an educational video involving treatment options for patients with newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma as part of routine clinical care. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the video format in improving efficiency and workflow. Many studies have shown that multimedia tools improve patient education and have been more efficient than in-office verbal discussions alone. In addition, educational videos have been documented to increase patient satisfaction as well as decrease patient stress level and anxiety. Other advantages of educational videos are for the repetition and reinforcement that would benefit the patient.

Moreover, with the utilization of video, patients will receive the same comprehensive information, making the delivery reproducible and controlled. With verbal communication, there is usually no standardized interaction between staff and patients to ensure that the patient is receiving all pertinent information regarding their options. For example, a study designed to examine retention rates for verbal and written instructions, including 10 potential complications, in patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery showed an overall poor retention rate of only 26.5% just 20 minutes after being informed. It is obvious then that educational protocols need additional modalities in order to improve overall retention rates. This then suggests that information presented in video format increases knowledge retention in patients, even weeks after initial delivery of information.

Study participants will be randomly assigned to the control (Group I) - or video- (Group II) group. Participants will be randomized by clinic. Patients randomized to Group II will complete a pre-video knowledge assessment followed by viewing of the BCC educational video. Patients will complete a post-video knowledge assessment following video viewing. Group II patients will then undergo discussion of treatment options with their physician as per standard of care. After the treatment discussion, Group II patients will complete an additional knowledge assessment. After the treatment visit is complete, patients will complete a satisfaction survey. Patients randomized to Group I will not view the educational video. Group I patients will complete a pre-knowledge assessment before their standard of care discussion of treatment options with their physician. Similar to Group II, patients in Group I complete an additional knowledge assessment after the treatment discussion and a satisfaction survey at the conclusion of the treatment visit.

If there is failure of completion of a satisfaction survey in the dermatology clinic, patients (group I and group II) may be contacted via phone to complete the survey.

Physicians will be recruited to complete a satisfaction survey at the end of the day only if they provided treatment to a Group II patient (patients who viewed the video).

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

32

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, Verenigde Staten, 30322
        • Emory University
      • Decatur, Georgia, Verenigde Staten, 30033
        • Atlanta VA Medical Center

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients aged 18 or above for which treatment of Mohs surgery is not necessary and who agree to voluntarily participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma patients with an aggressive histologic subtype of BCC or for which treatment by Mohs surgery is deemed necessary based on clinician assessment

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Video Group
Patients randomized to Group II will be emailed the educational video, pre- and post- knowledge assessments, and patient satisfaction survey with instructions on what order to fill them out. Group II patients will report to the treatment visit and undergo discussion of options and treatment as per standard of care. An additional knowledge assessment survey will be administered to Group II patients after discussion with treating physician.
Geen tussenkomst: Control Group
Patients randomized to Group I will be come to the clinic for the treatment visit and discuss options and treatment as per standard of care. Pre- and post- discussion knowledge assessments and satisfaction surveys will be administered at the time of the treatment visit.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Patient Satisfaction
Tijdsspanne: Up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Paper surveys
Up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Physicians' satisfaction
Tijdsspanne: Up to 10 hours (end of clinic day)
Online satisfaction survey
Up to 10 hours (end of clinic day)
Change in health knowledge
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Paper surveys
Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Video Medium Effectiveness
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Paper surveys
Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Suephy Chen, MD, Emory University

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 juli 2014

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 augustus 2015

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 augustus 2015

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

2 juni 2014

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

5 juni 2014

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

9 juni 2014

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

17 augustus 2015

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

13 augustus 2015

Laatst geverifieerd

1 augustus 2015

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • IRB00058881
  • DCOR-BCC (Andere identificatie: Other)
  • IRB00074984 (VA IRB number) (Andere identificatie: Other)

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren