Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Video-Based Treatment Options for Basal Cell Carcinoma

13 de agosto de 2015 actualizado por: Suephy Chen, MD, Emory University

The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Using Video-Based Treatment Option Education Medium for Basal Cell Carcinoma Patients

The purpose of this study is to determine if presenting treatment options to basal cell carcinoma patients in video format will improve efficiency and allow patients to receive consistent, comprehensive, visually-depicted treatment option information to improve patient quality of care. Patients can learn more about treatment options as they are depicted visually so as to better assist them in understanding treatment risks and benefits to confidently make a well-informed decision. Primarily, the study will evaluate efficiency when using the education video medium. The study will also evaluate the effectiveness of the video medium as an aid to decision making in addition to standard of care in comparison to the standard of care alone. Additionally, the study will evaluate both patients' and dermatologists' satisfaction of the educational intervention.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Currently, verbal consultation is the widespread practice in presenting treatment options for basal cell carcinoma patients. This method, although personable and direct, is often incomplete and subject to variability.

The Emory Department of Dermatology has created an educational video involving treatment options for patients with newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma as part of routine clinical care. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the video format in improving efficiency and workflow. Many studies have shown that multimedia tools improve patient education and have been more efficient than in-office verbal discussions alone. In addition, educational videos have been documented to increase patient satisfaction as well as decrease patient stress level and anxiety. Other advantages of educational videos are for the repetition and reinforcement that would benefit the patient.

Moreover, with the utilization of video, patients will receive the same comprehensive information, making the delivery reproducible and controlled. With verbal communication, there is usually no standardized interaction between staff and patients to ensure that the patient is receiving all pertinent information regarding their options. For example, a study designed to examine retention rates for verbal and written instructions, including 10 potential complications, in patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery showed an overall poor retention rate of only 26.5% just 20 minutes after being informed. It is obvious then that educational protocols need additional modalities in order to improve overall retention rates. This then suggests that information presented in video format increases knowledge retention in patients, even weeks after initial delivery of information.

Study participants will be randomly assigned to the control (Group I) - or video- (Group II) group. Participants will be randomized by clinic. Patients randomized to Group II will complete a pre-video knowledge assessment followed by viewing of the BCC educational video. Patients will complete a post-video knowledge assessment following video viewing. Group II patients will then undergo discussion of treatment options with their physician as per standard of care. After the treatment discussion, Group II patients will complete an additional knowledge assessment. After the treatment visit is complete, patients will complete a satisfaction survey. Patients randomized to Group I will not view the educational video. Group I patients will complete a pre-knowledge assessment before their standard of care discussion of treatment options with their physician. Similar to Group II, patients in Group I complete an additional knowledge assessment after the treatment discussion and a satisfaction survey at the conclusion of the treatment visit.

If there is failure of completion of a satisfaction survey in the dermatology clinic, patients (group I and group II) may be contacted via phone to complete the survey.

Physicians will be recruited to complete a satisfaction survey at the end of the day only if they provided treatment to a Group II patient (patients who viewed the video).

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

32

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 30322
        • Emory University
      • Decatur, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 30033
        • Atlanta VA Medical Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients aged 18 or above for which treatment of Mohs surgery is not necessary and who agree to voluntarily participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma patients with an aggressive histologic subtype of BCC or for which treatment by Mohs surgery is deemed necessary based on clinician assessment

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Video Group
Patients randomized to Group II will be emailed the educational video, pre- and post- knowledge assessments, and patient satisfaction survey with instructions on what order to fill them out. Group II patients will report to the treatment visit and undergo discussion of options and treatment as per standard of care. An additional knowledge assessment survey will be administered to Group II patients after discussion with treating physician.
Sin intervención: Control Group
Patients randomized to Group I will be come to the clinic for the treatment visit and discuss options and treatment as per standard of care. Pre- and post- discussion knowledge assessments and satisfaction surveys will be administered at the time of the treatment visit.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Patient Satisfaction
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Paper surveys
Up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Physicians' satisfaction
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 10 hours (end of clinic day)
Online satisfaction survey
Up to 10 hours (end of clinic day)
Change in health knowledge
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Paper surveys
Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Video Medium Effectiveness
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)
Paper surveys
Baseline (beginning of clinic visit), up to 1 hour (end of clinic visit)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Suephy Chen, MD, Emory University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de julio de 2014

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de junio de 2014

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de junio de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

9 de junio de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

17 de agosto de 2015

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de agosto de 2015

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2015

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • IRB00058881
  • DCOR-BCC (Otro identificador: Other)
  • IRB00074984 (VA IRB number) (Otro identificador: Other)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir