- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT03352973
Regulation of Craving in Internet Gamers
Regulation of Craving in Internet Gamers: Neural Mechanisms and tDCS Intervention
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
As with the experiment about tDCS effects on regulation of craving and aversive emotions, the experiment aims to test whether tDCS over dlPFC will enhance cognitive regulation of craving and aversive emotions. It is a within-subject, sham-controlled, double-blind design. Each participant receive both active and sham tDCS of dlPFC in a randomized order separated by one week. During both active and sham tDCS sessions, participants will perform regulation of craving (ROC) and emotion regulation (ER) tasks. In the ROC task, participants will be asked to downregulate and upregulate craving elicited by gaming pictures using cognitive reappraisal. In the ER task, participants will be asked to downregulate and upregulate aversive feelings elicited by negative pictures using cognitive reappraisal. During these tasks, self-report ratings and skin conductance responses (SCRs) will be recorded. The cognitive regulation ability is indexed by rating and SCRs differences between the up- and downregulation conditions.
As with the experiment about tDCS effects on attentional bias, the experiment aims to test whether tDCS over dlPFC will enhance inhibitory control of attentional bias towards gaming related cues. The inhibitory control of attentional bias will be measured by a cognitive task in which participants will perform a number classification task with gaming pictures and non-gaming pictures being distractors. The experiment is a within-subject, sham-controlled, double-blind design. Each participant will receive both active and sham tDCS of dlPFC in a randomized order separated by one week. After each tDCS session, participants will complete the cognitive task assessing inhibitory control of attentional bias. During the task, reaction times (RTs) wil be recorded. The attentional bias is indexed by RTs differences between trials with gaming pictures and trials with non-gaming pictures.
Studietype
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100875
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- engagement in a popular Internet game (Arena of Valor) for over 14 hours per week for a minimum of 6 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- current or history of use of illegal substances and gambling;
- current or history of psychiatric or neurological illness;
- current use of psychotropic medications.
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Fundamentele wetenschap
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Crossover-opdracht
- Masker: Dubbele
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: active tDCS on the dlPFC
tDCS on the DLPFC Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) target will be identified by the baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study for regulation of craving using a separate sample.
During the intervention, each participant will receive an active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention on this DLPFC region (1.5 mA for 20 minutes).
|
During active tDCS session, participants will perform the regulation of craving (ROC) and emotion regulation (ER) tasks.
In the ROC task, participants will downregulate and upregulate craving elicited by gaming pictures using cognitive reappraisal.
In the ER task, participants will downregulate and upregulate aversive feelings by negative pictures using cognitive reappraisal.
After the active tDCS session, participants will complete a cognitive task assessing inhibitory control of attentional bias, in which participants will perform a number classification task with gaming pictures and non-gaming pictures being distractors.
During the task, reaction times (RTs) wil be recorded.
Andere namen:
|
|
Sham-vergelijker: sham tDCS on the dlPFC
Each participant will also receive a sham tDCS intervention as a controlled condition.
The sham tDCS only include a 30-s ramp up and a 30-s ramp down.
|
During the sham tDCS session, participants will perform the regulation of craving (ROC) and emotion regulation (ER) tasks.
In the ROC task, participants will downregulate and upregulate craving elicited by gaming pictures using cognitive reappraisal.
In the ER task, participants will downregulate and upregulate aversive feelings by negative pictures using cognitive reappraisal.
After the sham tDCS session, participants will complete a cognitive task assessing inhibitory control of attentional bias, in which participants will perform a number classification task with gaming pictures and non-gaming pictures being distractors.
During the task, reaction times (RTs) wil be recorded.
Andere namen:
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Craving in the regulation of craving (ROC) task after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 4 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS for half of the participants
|
Using the Visual Analog Scale (from 1 = 'not at all' to 9 = 'very much'), craving is assessed in the ROC task.
This task lasts 12-13 minutes.
Craving in the downregulation condition will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
Craving in the upregulation condition will also be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
4 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS for half of the participants
|
|
Aversive feeling in the emotion regulation (ER) task after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 16-17 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Using the Visual Analog Scale (from 1 = 'not at all' to 9 = 'very much'), aversive feeling is assessed in the ER task.
This task lasts 12-13 minutes.
Aversive feeling in the downregulation condition will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
Aversive feeling in the upregulation condition will also be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
16-17 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
|
Reaction times (RTs) in the cognitive task assessing inhibition of attentional bias after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 45-47 minutes after the initiation of of active and sham tDCS
|
Using the E-prime software, RTs are recorded in milliseconds in the cognitive task assessing inhibition of attentional bias.
The cognitive task lasts 5-6 minutes.
RTs difference between the trials including gaming pictures and those including gaming pictures will be calculated and such RTs difference will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
45-47 minutes after the initiation of of active and sham tDCS
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Skin conductance responses (SCRs) in the ROC task after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 4 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Using a biosignal recorder, SCRs are recorded in μs in the ROC task.
This task lasts 12-13 minutes.
SCRs in the downregulation condition will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
SCRs in the upregulation condition will also be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
4 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
|
Skin conductance responses (SCRs) in the ER task after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 16-17 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS ham tDCS
|
Using a biosignal recorder, SCRs are recorded in μs in the ER task.
This task lasts 12-13 minutes.
SCRs in the downregulation condition will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
SCRs in the upregulation condition will also be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
16-17 minutes after the initiation of active and sham tDCS ham tDCS
|
|
Background craving before the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: Approximately 10 minutes before the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Using the Visual Analog Scale (from 1 = 'not at all' to 9 = 'very much'), background craving is assessed with a one-item questionaire (how much do you crave playing internet games now?).
This assessment lasts approximately 1 minute.
Background craving will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
Approximately 10 minutes before the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
|
Cue-induced craving before the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: Approximately 8 minutes before the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Using the Visual Analog Scale (from 1 = 'not at all' to 9 = 'very much'), cue-induced craving is assessed in a cue-reactivity task.
This assessment lasts 1-2 minutes.
Cue-induced craving will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
Approximately 8 minutes before the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
|
Background craving after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 38-40 minutes after the the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Using the Visual Analog Scale (from 1 = 'not at all' to 9 = 'very much'), background craving is assessed with a one-item questionaire (how much do you crave playing internet games now?).
This assessment lasts approximately 1 minute.
Background craving will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
38-40 minutes after the the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
|
Cue-induced craving after the initiation of active and sham tDCS
Tijdsspanne: 40-42 minutes after the the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Using the Visual Analog Scale (from 1 = 'not at all' to 9 = 'very much'), cue-induced craving is assessed in a cue-reactivity task.
This assessment lasts 1-2 minutes.
Cue-induced craving will be compared between the active and sham tDCS.
|
40-42 minutes after the the initiation of active and sham tDCS
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Jin-Tao Zhang, Phd, Beijing Normal University
Publicaties en nuttige links
Algemene publicaties
- Kober H, Mende-Siedlecki P, Kross EF, Weber J, Mischel W, Hart CL, Ochsner KN. Prefrontal-striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14811-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007779107. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
- Wu LL, Potenza MN, Zhou N, Kober H, Shi XH, Yip SW, Xu JH, Zhu L, Wang R, Liu GQ, Zhang JT. Efficacy of single-session transcranial direct current stimulation on addiction-related inhibitory control and craving: a randomized trial in males with Internet gaming disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021 Jan 4;46(1):E111-E118. doi: 10.1503/jpn.190137.
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Werkelijk)
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- IGDROC
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .