Mixed and Match vs One-size-fits-all
22 maart 2022 bijgewerkt door: Dr Katherine Lam, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Mixed and Match Versus One-size-fits-all: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Self-determination Theory on a Menu of Smoking Cessation Options (SDTM) Among Adult Smokers
Most existing smoking cessation services are based on '5A's' and '5R's' models which are recognized by the World Health Organization as a standardized tool for smoking cessation.
While there are more techniques that are known to be effective and could be incorporated in existing smoking cessation interventions to further promote their effectiveness.
This study is to examine the effectiveness SDTM in assisting adult smokers in Hong Kong to quit.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Nog niet aan het werven
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted.
One-hundred adult smokers aged 25 or above will be recruited from smoking hotspots in Hong Kong.
Participants in the intervention group will be contacted by our trained research assistant to receive a telephone counselling session at baseline.
Participants can choose to receive their own smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
Control group participants will only receive a self-help quitting leaflet
Studietype
Ingrijpend
Inschrijving (Verwacht)
500
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.
Studiecontact
- Naam: Katherine Lam, PhD
- Telefoonnummer: 27666420
- E-mail: kwkatlam@polyu.edu.hk
Studie Contact Back-up
- Naam: Eva Ho, PhD
- Telefoonnummer: 27666417
- E-mail: kyeva.ho@polyu.edu.hk
Deelname Criteria
Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
25 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Ja
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Allemaal
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- have smoking in the previous 30 days.
- be above 25 years old
- able to speak Cantonese and read Chinese
Exclusion Criteria:
- who are receiving current smoking cessation services
- report psychological disorders
- at risk of suicide
Studie plan
Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Ander: Mixed and Match
Participants can choose to receive their own smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
|
Participants will receive a brief 15-minute counselling session based on the 5A's' and '5R's' models by our trained research assistant.
Participants will be able to choose their smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
|
|
Ander: Control
Participants will receive a self-help quitting leaflet
|
Participants in the control group will receive a self-help quitting leaflet issued by the TACO
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Biochemically validated abstinence
Tijdsspanne: At 6 months follow-up
|
validate the self-reported abstinence if the level of carbon monoxide in expired air was less than 4 parts per million and saliva cotinine level was less than100 ng/mL in parallel tests
|
At 6 months follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Screening rate
Tijdsspanne: at day 1
|
calculated as the number of smokers screened at smoking hotspots by the RA divided by number of smokers available
|
at day 1
|
|
Eligibility rate
Tijdsspanne: at day 1
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who are eligible by the number who are screened.
|
at day 1
|
|
Randomization rate
Tijdsspanne: at day 1
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who are randomized into intervention and control groups by those who provide consent.
|
at day 1
|
|
Attendance rate
Tijdsspanne: Immediately after the training workshop
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who complete the intervention by those who are randomized.
|
Immediately after the training workshop
|
|
Retention rate at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Retention rate at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Retention rate at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Retention rate at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 6-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 6-month follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-week follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-month follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 3-month follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-week follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 1-month follow-up
|
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: At 3-month follow-up
|
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 1-week follow-up
Tijdsspanne: at 1-week follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
at 1-week follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 1-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: at 1-month follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 3-month follow-up
Tijdsspanne: at 3-month follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
at 3-month follow-up
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Katherine Lam, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Studie record data
Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Verwacht)
1 juli 2022
Primaire voltooiing (Verwacht)
31 december 2023
Studie voltooiing (Verwacht)
31 december 2023
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
18 mei 2021
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
22 maart 2022
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
28 maart 2022
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
28 maart 2022
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
22 maart 2022
Laatst geverifieerd
1 maart 2022
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- SDTM-adult
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
NEE
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Nee
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Nee
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .