- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT05297370
Mixed and Match vs One-size-fits-all
22. März 2022 aktualisiert von: Dr Katherine Lam, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Mixed and Match Versus One-size-fits-all: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Self-determination Theory on a Menu of Smoking Cessation Options (SDTM) Among Adult Smokers
Most existing smoking cessation services are based on '5A's' and '5R's' models which are recognized by the World Health Organization as a standardized tool for smoking cessation.
While there are more techniques that are known to be effective and could be incorporated in existing smoking cessation interventions to further promote their effectiveness.
This study is to examine the effectiveness SDTM in assisting adult smokers in Hong Kong to quit.
Studienübersicht
Status
Noch keine Rekrutierung
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted.
One-hundred adult smokers aged 25 or above will be recruited from smoking hotspots in Hong Kong.
Participants in the intervention group will be contacted by our trained research assistant to receive a telephone counselling session at baseline.
Participants can choose to receive their own smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
Control group participants will only receive a self-help quitting leaflet
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)
500
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienkontakt
- Name: Katherine Lam, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 27666420
- E-Mail: kwkatlam@polyu.edu.hk
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Eva Ho, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 27666417
- E-Mail: kyeva.ho@polyu.edu.hk
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
25 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Ja
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- have smoking in the previous 30 days.
- be above 25 years old
- able to speak Cantonese and read Chinese
Exclusion Criteria:
- who are receiving current smoking cessation services
- report psychological disorders
- at risk of suicide
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Sonstiges: Mixed and Match
Participants can choose to receive their own smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
|
Participants will receive a brief 15-minute counselling session based on the 5A's' and '5R's' models by our trained research assistant.
Participants will be able to choose their smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
|
|
Sonstiges: Control
Participants will receive a self-help quitting leaflet
|
Participants in the control group will receive a self-help quitting leaflet issued by the TACO
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Biochemically validated abstinence
Zeitfenster: At 6 months follow-up
|
validate the self-reported abstinence if the level of carbon monoxide in expired air was less than 4 parts per million and saliva cotinine level was less than100 ng/mL in parallel tests
|
At 6 months follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Screening rate
Zeitfenster: at day 1
|
calculated as the number of smokers screened at smoking hotspots by the RA divided by number of smokers available
|
at day 1
|
|
Eligibility rate
Zeitfenster: at day 1
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who are eligible by the number who are screened.
|
at day 1
|
|
Randomization rate
Zeitfenster: at day 1
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who are randomized into intervention and control groups by those who provide consent.
|
at day 1
|
|
Attendance rate
Zeitfenster: Immediately after the training workshop
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who complete the intervention by those who are randomized.
|
Immediately after the training workshop
|
|
Retention rate at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Retention rate at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Retention rate at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Retention rate at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to intervention protocol at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Complete rate at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-week follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-month follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 3-month follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Missing data at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 6-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 6-month follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 6-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-week follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-month follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Adverse events at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 3-month follow-up
|
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-week follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 1-week follow-up
|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 1-month follow-up
|
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 1-month follow-up
|
|
Self-reported abstinence at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: At 3-month follow-up
|
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
|
At 3-month follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 1-week follow-up
Zeitfenster: at 1-week follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
at 1-week follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 1-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: at 1-month follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Self-efficacy at 3-month follow-up
Zeitfenster: at 3-month follow-up
|
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting.
The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
|
at 3-month follow-up
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Katherine Lam, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Voraussichtlich)
1. Juli 2022
Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)
31. Dezember 2023
Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)
31. Dezember 2023
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
18. Mai 2021
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
22. März 2022
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
28. März 2022
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
28. März 2022
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
22. März 2022
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. März 2022
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- SDTM-adult
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Mixed and match Intervention
-
Berkeley Eye CenterSengiRekrutierung
-
Arizona State UniversityFoundation for Professional DevelopmentRekrutierung
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiAbgeschlossenBrustkrebs | Prostatakrebs | LeberkrebsVereinigte Staaten
-
Drexel UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Rekrutierung
-
Indiana UniversityIndiana University HealthAbgeschlossenMetastasierender Krebs | Fortgeschrittener KrebsVereinigte Staaten
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityFlorida State UniversityRekrutierungBeschränkter Intellekt | Sprech- und SprachstörungVereinigte Staaten
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Aktiv, nicht rekrutierendZerebralparese | FrühgeborenesVereinigte Staaten
-
Indiana UniversityIndiana University Health; Regenstrief Institute, Inc.AbgeschlossenDepression | PTBS | Angst | Kommunikation | BefriedigungVereinigte Staaten
-
Taipei Medical UniversityAktiv, nicht rekrutierendEmotionale Störung | Neuroentwicklungsstörungen | VerhaltensstörungenTaiwan
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Nottingham University Hospitals... und andere MitarbeiterNoch keine RekrutierungPädiatrischer Hirntumor | Hirntumor im Kindesalter | Hirntumore im Kindesalter | Pädiatrische HirntumorenVereinigtes Königreich