Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Mixed and Match vs One-size-fits-all

22. marts 2022 opdateret af: Dr Katherine Lam, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Mixed and Match Versus One-size-fits-all: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Self-determination Theory on a Menu of Smoking Cessation Options (SDTM) Among Adult Smokers

Most existing smoking cessation services are based on '5A's' and '5R's' models which are recognized by the World Health Organization as a standardized tool for smoking cessation. While there are more techniques that are known to be effective and could be incorporated in existing smoking cessation interventions to further promote their effectiveness. This study is to examine the effectiveness SDTM in assisting adult smokers in Hong Kong to quit.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. One-hundred adult smokers aged 25 or above will be recruited from smoking hotspots in Hong Kong. Participants in the intervention group will be contacted by our trained research assistant to receive a telephone counselling session at baseline. Participants can choose to receive their own smoking cessation treatment options from our menu. Control group participants will only receive a self-help quitting leaflet

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Forventet)

500

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

25 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have smoking in the previous 30 days.
  • be above 25 years old
  • able to speak Cantonese and read Chinese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who are receiving current smoking cessation services
  • report psychological disorders
  • at risk of suicide

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Andet: Mixed and Match
Participants can choose to receive their own smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Mixed and match Intervention
Participants will receive a brief 15-minute counselling session based on the 5A's' and '5R's' models by our trained research assistant. Participants will be able to choose their smoking cessation treatment options from our menu.
Andet: Control
Participants will receive a self-help quitting leaflet
Andet: Control
Participants in the control group will receive a self-help quitting leaflet issued by the TACO

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Self-reported abstinence at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
At 6-month follow-up
Biochemically validated abstinence
Tidsramme: At 6 months follow-up
validate the self-reported abstinence if the level of carbon monoxide in expired air was less than 4 parts per million and saliva cotinine level was less than100 ng/mL in parallel tests
At 6 months follow-up
Self-efficacy at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting. The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
At 6-month follow-up

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Screening rate
Tidsramme: at day 1
calculated as the number of smokers screened at smoking hotspots by the RA divided by number of smokers available
at day 1
Eligibility rate
Tidsramme: at day 1
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who are eligible by the number who are screened.
at day 1
Randomization rate
Tidsramme: at day 1
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who are randomized into intervention and control groups by those who provide consent.
at day 1
Attendance rate
Tidsramme: Immediately after the training workshop
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who complete the intervention by those who are randomized.
Immediately after the training workshop
Retention rate at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-week follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
At 1-week follow-up
Retention rate at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
At 1-month follow-up
Retention rate at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
At 6-month follow-up
Retention rate at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 3-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who remain in the study by those who are randomized
At 3-month follow-up
Adherence to intervention protocol at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-week follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
At 1-week follow-up
Adherence to intervention protocol at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
At 1-month follow-up
Adherence to intervention protocol at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 3-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
At 3-month follow-up
Adherence to intervention protocol at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who follow and practice the chosen treatment options by those who are randomized
At 6-month follow-up
Complete rate at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-week follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
At 1-week follow-up
Complete rate at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
At 1-month follow-up
Complete rate at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 3-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
At 3-month follow-up
Complete rate at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
calculated by dividing the number of smokers who returned questionnaires by the number of questionnaires distributed
At 6-month follow-up
Missing data at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-week follow-up
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
At 1-week follow-up
Missing data at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-month follow-up
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
At 1-month follow-up
Missing data at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 3-month follow-up
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
At 3-month follow-up
Missing data at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
calculated as the percentage of missing values in the dataset
At 6-month follow-up
Adverse events at 6-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 6-month follow-up
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
At 6-month follow-up
Adverse events at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-week follow-up
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
At 1-week follow-up
Adverse events at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-month follow-up
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
At 1-month follow-up
Adverse events at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 3-month follow-up
Participants will report any unfavorable and unintended events
At 3-month follow-up
Self-reported abstinence at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-week follow-up
Participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
At 1-week follow-up
Self-reported abstinence at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 1-month follow-up
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
At 1-month follow-up
Self-reported abstinence at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: At 3-month follow-up
participants will be asked about their self-reported abstinence in the past 7 and 30 days
At 3-month follow-up
Self-efficacy at 1-week follow-up
Tidsramme: at 1-week follow-up
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting. The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
at 1-week follow-up
Self-efficacy at 1-month follow-up
Tidsramme: at 1-month follow-up
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting. The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
at 1-month follow-up
Self-efficacy at 3-month follow-up
Tidsramme: at 3-month follow-up
Participants will be asked about their self-efficacy in quitting. The score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher self-efficacy.
at 3-month follow-up

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Katherine Lam, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Forventet)

1. juli 2022

Primær færdiggørelse (Forventet)

31. december 2023

Studieafslutning (Forventet)

31. december 2023

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

18. maj 2021

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

22. marts 2022

Først opslået (Faktiske)

28. marts 2022

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

28. marts 2022

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

22. marts 2022

Sidst verificeret

1. marts 2022

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • SDTM-adult

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Mixed and match Intervention

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Sweden

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner