Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Cauterization From the Origin Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

15 mei 2026 bijgewerkt door: Hadeer Ali Alashry Mohamed, Kafrelsheikh University
The main goal of this study is to compare between total Laparoscopic hysterectomy proceeded by Uterine artery cauterization at its origin and conventional total Laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding: bleeding , operative time , intra operative time and follow up post operative.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

The most common non-pregnancy-related gynecological procedure performed for women is a hysterectomy. (Uwais et al,. 2024 )In Germany, the incidence of hysterectomy ranges from 2.13 to 3.62/1000, while in the United States, it is 5.4/1000. In the US, about 600,000 hysterectomy surgeries are carried out each year. (Harvey et al ,. 2022 ) Fibroids, adenomyosis, endometriosis, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, uterine prolapse, and premalignant and malignant lesions are among the many indications for a hysterectomy. (Singh et al ,. 2024 ) Traditionally , hysterectomy has been done abdominally or by vaginal route . In the present era , Laparoscopic hysterectomy has recently received a considerable respect as a favourable hysterectomy technique . ( Bartels et al ,. 2020 ) Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe , workable technique , provides minimal post operative discomfort, shorter hospital stay , rapid convalescence , early return to daily activities. ( Pepin , K. et al ., 2020 ).

Selection of route of hysterectomy can be influenced by size , shape of the vagina and uterus, accessibility of the uterus, extent of extra uterine disease , surgeon experience, available hospital support, whether the case is emergent or scheduled and preference of the informed patient . ( Panda et al ,. 2022 )

.As Laparoscopic surgery becomes more advanced and widely applied, the absolute contraindications to laparoscopy are diminishing . Patient limitations to Laparoscopic surgery can be both anatomical and physiological .

Adverse anatomical limitations include difficult access to the abdomen , obliteration of the peritoneal space , organomegaly , intestinal distension and the potential for cancer dissemination.

The major physiological obstacles to safe Laparoscopy include increased intracranial pressure, abnormalities in cardiac output and gas exchange in the lung , chronic liver disease and coagulopathy . These anatomical and physiological conditions were formerly considered absolute contraindications to laparoscopy, they are now considered only relative contraindications.( Madhok et al ,. 2022 )

. The uterus receives the majority of its blood supply from the uterine artery, a branch of the internal iliac artery. In order to reach the uterine cervix, the uterine artery is first found 2.5 cm lateral and superior to the ureter before crossing it anteriorly to its medial side .( Selcuk I et al ,. 2018).

The ureter is more susceptible to injury during oophorectomy and hysterectomy because of its close relationship to the ovary, where it lies beneath the insertion of the infundibulopelvic ligament at the pelvic brim, and its relationship to the uterine artery, where it passes inferior to the uterine artery.( Lescay et al ,. 2024 )

Although total Laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH ) is generally safe .There is a potential risk of complications may occur . Excessive blood loss during TLH is still an issue which need blood transfusion especially in case of large uteri . ( Saad _ Naguib M et al , .2022) .

During TLH, the uterine arteries (UAs) must be closed effectively.Closing UAs at the uterine level or at the origin from the internal iliac artery are the two main options . The decision is solely based on the preferences and opinions of the surgeon.( Uccella et al ,. 2021) .

There is a shortage in data that compare two techniques , therefore , Current study will be conducted to compare feasibility, duration of the surgery , estimated blood loss , post operative complications during conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus early Uterine artery cauterization at its origin .

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

44

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Contact Back-up

  • Naam: Mustafa Farag Ellakany, Lecturer
  • Telefoonnummer: +2 01016083210

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria: Age of the patient is more than 35 y . Non malignant pathologies including fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia, Dysfunctional Uterine bleeding not responding to medical treatment.

Good general condition of the patient ( American society of Anesthesiologists "ASA" score 1 , 2 , 3 ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) .

Uterine size is less than 20 weeks by fundal level . -

Exclusion Criteria:Age of the patient is less than 35 y . Gynecological malignancies . Contraindications for laparoscopy as any medical condition worsens by peumo peritoneum or Trendelenburg position as severely compromised cardiopulmonary status .

Patients with American society of Anesthesiologists score 4 or more . ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) Uterine size is more than 20 weeks by fundal level .

-

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior uterine artery cauterization from the origin
Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin take less time and cause less bleeding
Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1
Experimenteel: Conventional Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Conventional Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy may cause more blood loss and take more time
Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with ligation of uterine artery beside uterus is considered conventional and may cause more blood loss and take more time

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Is to compare peri operative blood loss by counting amount of blood in ml drained by suction , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours after surgery
Is to compare peri operative blood loss by counting amount of blood in ml drained by suction , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
24 hours after surgery
Is to compare peri operative blood loss , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
Tijdsspanne: One week after surgery
Is to compare peri operative blood loss , operation time between conventional TLH and TLH with prior Uterine artery occlusion
One week after surgery

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Post operative pain , difference in Hemoglobin level in mg /dl pre and post operative, frequency of post operative hematoma in cm detected by us at vaginal vault and ureteric complications
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours postoperative
Post operative pain , difference in Hemoglobin level in mg / dl pre and post operative, frequency of post operative hematoma in cm detected by us at vaginal vault and ureteric complications
24 hours postoperative

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Geschat)

15 mei 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

15 mei 2027

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

15 juni 2027

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

9 juli 2025

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

15 mei 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

22 mei 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

22 mei 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

15 mei 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 mei 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • Total Laparoscopic hysterectom

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren