Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Patient Priorities Aligned Discrete Decision Making for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

21 oktober 2026 bijgewerkt door: Aanand Dinkar Naik, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

The purpose of the study is to to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) powered large language model (LLM) chatbot -PrioritiesAI -that assists patients in understanding, clarifying, and communicating their health priorities and desired outcomes related to elective hernia surgery.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Werving

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

80

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Contact Back-up

Studie Locaties

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

60 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Capacity to provide informed consent
  • Ability to communicate effectively by phone in English
  • Access to a working email address that the participant checks regularly
  • Scheduled for an upcoming outpatient consultation with one of our partner surgeons to discuss elective hernia surgery (femoral, ventral, inguinal, or umbilical)
  • No significant cognitive impairment that would interfere with meaningful participation

To ensure focus on surgical decisions, participants must fall into one of these categories:

  1. Patients scheduled for an upcoming outpatient consultation with one of our partner surgeons specifically to discuss a potential surgical procedure
  2. Patients who have undergone a surgical procedure performed one of our partner surgeons after January 1, 2025
  3. Participants must meet criteria #1 or #2 above and must not have participated in Phase 1 of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment sufficient to interfere with meaningful participation in Patient Priorities Care (PPC) discussions
  • Communication challenges that cannot be reasonably accommodated within the study protocol
  • Inability to complete patient-reported outcome measures independently or with minimal assistance
  • Lack of decision-making capacity regarding surgical care

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ander
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Geen tussenkomst: Bedieningsarm
Experimenteel: AI Chatbot
Gedragsmatig: AI Chatbot

Participants receive a personalized web link by email .The link provides access to the Priorities AI chatbot on any internet-connected device. The chatbot guides participants through a structured conversation to identify their health priorities and goals related to their surgical decision,

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Decision regret as assessed by the Decision regret scale
Tijdsspanne: 4 months after surgery

This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(no regret)-5 (high regret). Average of the item scores are calculated then 1 is subtracted and the final score is multiplied by 25 for a final metric from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicating worse outcome
4 months after surgery
Self-identified health goals following elective hernia surgery, as measured by the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Tijdsspanne: 4 months after surgery

This is rated on a 5-point scale from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much better than expected), with 0 representing the expected level of goal attainment. Higher scores indicate greater attainment of individualized goals.
4 months after surgery

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Decision-making quality in surgical consultations using the Shared Decision-Making Process (SDMP)Scale
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

The Shared Decision-Making Process (SDMP) Scale is a 4-item, patient-reported measure. Maximum scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater shared decision-making.
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
Perceived involvement in care using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS, binary format)
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored as 1(agree) or 0(disagree) for a total score 0-13, with higher scores indicating greater perceived involvement in care.
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
Decisional confidence using the SURE scale
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored as a 1(yes) or 0(no) for a maximum score of 0-4,higher score indicating greater decisional confidence
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
Acceptability as assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
Appropriateness as assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
Feasibility as assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1( completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) for a maximum score of 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention
Assigned preparation approach on health-related quality of life using the Short Form (SF-12) Quality of Life Scale
Tijdsspanne: 4 months after surgery

The SF-12 assesses physical and mental health across eight health concepts and generates two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). Both scores are calculated using responses to all 12 items and are typically reported on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
4 months after surgery
Comfort and function following surgery using the Carolina's Comfort Scale (CCS)
Tijdsspanne: 4 months after surgery

This is a 23 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(no symptoms) to 5( disabling symptoms) for a score range of 0-115, higher score indicating worse postoperative comfort
4 months after surgery
Satisfaction as assessed by the Satisfaction Measure
Tijdsspanne: 24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

This is a 1 item questionnaire and scored from 0(worst visit possible)-10 ( best visit possible) , higher value means better outcome
24 hours-72 hours after the intervention

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Aanand D Naik, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

30 april 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

30 oktober 2027

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

30 oktober 2027

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

22 september 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

22 september 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 september 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

26 oktober 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

21 oktober 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 september 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • HSC-SPH-22-0586

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren