Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Evaluation of Two Different Methods of Resin Composite Application In Class II Restorations

2. oktober 2015 oppdatert av: Damascus University

Evaluation of Two Different Methods of Resin Composite Application Using Bulk-fill Technique In Class II Restorations

Three clinical groups will be evaluated. Each group of patients will undergo one method of Resin Composite application (multi-layer technique 'control group' - bulk-fill Technique - Sonicfill technique). The restored teeth will be followed-up till one year. A comparison is going to be made between the three groups in relation to the modified United Sates Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria of good restorations.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

The modified USPHS criteria include the evaluation of seven characteristics of the restorations: color match, marginal integrity, surface texture, wear of both restoration and antagonist, recurrent dental caries, fracture or detachment, and gingivitis around the abutment.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

60

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

  • Den syriske arabiske republikk
      • Damascus, Den syriske arabiske republikk, DM20AM18
        • Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Damascus Dental School

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

15 år til 60 år (Barn, Voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cooperated patients.
  2. Good general health.
  3. Good oral hygiene.
  4. Aged 15 to 60 years.
  5. Class II restoration (upper or lower)
  6. Full erupted teeth.
  7. Caries value D3 -D4 according to Daignodent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. If the caries value according to Daignodent is less than D3 -D4.
  2. If the tooth is partially erupted.
  3. Class II box-like cavity only without any extensions.
  4. Patient outside the required age range (15-60 years).
  5. Bad oral hygiene.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Ingen inngripen: Conventional Technique
Multi-layer filling technique
Aktiv komparator: Bulk fill technique
Fremgangsmåte: Bulk fill
This is one of the composite restoration application techniques
Eksperimentell: SonicFill technique
Fremgangsmåte: SonicFill
This is the recent intervention under evaluation

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Color Match
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Color match

  1. The restoration appears to match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth tissues.
  2. The restoration does not match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth tissues, but the mismatch is within the range of tooth shade.
  3. The restoration does not match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth tissues, and the mismatch is outside the normal range of tooth shade and translucency.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.
Change in Marginal Integrity
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Marginal integrity

  1. The explorer does not catch when drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth, or, if the explorer does catch, there is no visible crevice along the periphery of the restoration.
  2. The explorer catches and there is visible evidence of crevice, into which the explorer penetrates, indicating that the edge of the restoration does not adapt closely to the tooth structure.
  3. the explorer penetrates a crevice defect.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.
Change in Surface Texture
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Surface texture:

  1. Surface texture is similar to polished enamel as determined by means of a sharp explorer.
  2. Surface texture is gritty similar to a surface subject to a white stone or similar to a composite containing supramicron sizes particles.
  3. Surface pitting is sufficiently coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.
Change in Restoration Wear
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Wear

  1. The restoration is continuation of existing anatomic form or is slightly flattened.
  2. A surface concavity is evident.
  3. There is a loss of restorative substance such that a surface concavity is evident. Replacement or restorative treatment is required.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.
Recurrent dental caries
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Recurrent dental caries:

  1. The restoration is a continuation of existing anatomic form adjacent to the restoration.
  2. There is visual evidence of dark deep discoloration adjacent to the restoration.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.
The Fracture/detachment Status
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Fracture/detachment:

  1. No bulk fracture/detachment is present.
  2. Bulk fracture/ detachment is evident.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.
Change in gingival status
Tidsramme: Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Gingival status

  1. No clinical inflammation is present.
  2. Clinical inflammation is present.
Assessment will be done at (T0) within the first hour following composite sitting, (T1) after 3 months, (T2) after six months, (T3) after six months, (T4) at 12 months following application.

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Damascus University

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Rahaf Alkurdi, DDS MSc, PhD student, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus
  • Studieleder: Souad Abboud, DDS MSc PhD, Associate Professor, Operative Dentistry Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. juli 2014

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. juli 2015

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. oktober 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

4. juli 2014

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

4. juli 2014

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

9. juli 2014

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

5. oktober 2015

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

2. oktober 2015

Sist bekreftet

1. oktober 2015

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • UDDS-OperDent-01-2014

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere