- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT02487771
Kansas University DHA Outcome Study (KUDOS) Follow-Up
29. januar 2018 oppdatert av: Susan Carlson, PhD
This is a continuation study to KUDOS (NCT00266825).
The purpose of this study is to follow-up with participants on the original study to determine if the effects of increasing DHA intake during pregnancy increase cognitive development in 2 to 6 year-old children.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Numerous trials show benefits of postnatal DHA supplementation for visual acuity.
There are also numerous observational(not intervention)studies that link higher maternal DHA status during pregnancy to higher cognitive function.
Intervention studies that increase DHA exposure during fetal life and that measure cognitive development of infants are lacking; and no study to date has systematically followed children whose mothers were randomly assigned to DHA supplementation to school age with regular 6 month assessments of age-appropriate assessments of cognitive development.
The absence of such studies is a serious limitation because there is evidence that differences in cognitive function due to such interventions do not become robust until around age 4 years.
Women in the US consume low amounts of DHA compared to other world populations, and this likely means less DHA transfer to the fetus than in many other populations.
Prenatal DHA exposure may be more important than postnatal exposure, because animal studies show critical windows for brain DHA accumulation in relation to effects on neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine and GABA.
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
190
Fase
- Fase 3
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, Forente stater, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
16 år til 35 år (Barn, Voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Hunn
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant females 16.0-35.0 years of age (inclusive) at 8-20 weeks gestation at enrollment (date/ultrasound)
- Agree to consume study capsules from enrollment until delivery
- Agree to return to the study center for delivery
- BMI < 40
- No serious illnesses (e.g., cancer, diabetes, lupus, hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, not HIV positive)
- Available by telephone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 16 or greater than 35 years of age
- BMI < 40
- Serious illness such as cancer, lupus, hepatitis, sexually transmitted disease or HIV positive
- Expecting multiple infants
- Diabetes or gestational diabetes at baseline
- Elevated blood pressure due to any cause
- Not planning to return to the study center for delivery
- Gestational age at baseline < 8 weeks or >20 weeks
- Unable or unwilling to agree to consume capsules until delivery
- Unable to provide informed consent in English
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Dobbelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Placebo komparator: Placebo kapsel
|
600 mg of Soybean Oil and Corn Oil, which does not contain any DHA
|
|
Eksperimentell: DHA Capsule
|
600 mg DHA capsule
Andre navn:
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Full Scale IQ
Tidsramme: 36 Months
|
The Full Scale IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's general intellectual ability based upon assessments of verbal, cognitive, and performance domains.
At three years the Full Scale IQ score has a range of 41 (poorest performance) to 155 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 40 to 160.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
36 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Full Scale IQ
Tidsramme: 48 Months
|
The Full Scale IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's general intellectual ability based upon assessments of verbal, cognitive, and performance domains.
At three years the Full Scale IQ score has a range of 41 (poorest performance) to 155 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 40 to 160.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
48 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Full Scale IQ
Tidsramme: 72 Months
|
The Full Scale IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's general intellectual ability based upon assessments of verbal, cognitive, and performance domains.
At three years the Full Scale IQ score has a range of 41 (poorest performance) to 155 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 40 to 160.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
72 Months
|
|
Cognitive Function Score - Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
Tidsramme: 60 Months
|
The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd Edition provides a standardized assessment of a person's receptive vocabulary.
The Standard Score can range from 40 (poorest performance) to 160 (best performance) and has been normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
60 Months
|
|
Cognitive Function Score - Test of Preschool Early Literacy
Tidsramme: 42 Months
|
The Test of Preschool Early Literacy provides a standardized Early Literacy Index score, a measure of general, early literacy skills that relate to later reading and writing skill acquisition.
The score is based on assessments of vocabulary, print knowledge, and phonological awareness.
The score can range from 40 (poorest performance) to 144 (best performance) and has been normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
42 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Verbal IQ
Tidsramme: 36 Months
|
The Verbal IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's verbal ability based upon assessments of vocabulary, general knowledge, and reasoning.
At three years the Verbal IQ score has a range of 49 (poorest performance) to 150 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 46 to 155.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
36 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Verbal IQ
Tidsramme: 48 Months
|
The Verbal IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's verbal ability based upon assessments of vocabulary, general knowledge, and reasoning.
At three years the Verbal IQ score has a range of 49 (poorest performance) to 150 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 46 to 155.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
48 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Verbal IQ
Tidsramme: 72 Months
|
The Verbal IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's verbal ability based upon assessments of vocabulary, general knowledge, and reasoning.
At three years the Verbal IQ score has a range of 49 (poorest performance) to 150 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 46 to 155.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
72 Months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Tidsramme: 36 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
36 Months
|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Tidsramme: 48 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
48 Months
|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Tidsramme: 60 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
60 Months
|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Tidsramme: 72 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
72 Months
|
Andre resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 2 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 3 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 2 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
6 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 3 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
6 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 2 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 3 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
6 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 2 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 3 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
6 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 2 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
2 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 2.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 3 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
3 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 3.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
4 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
6 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
6 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
6 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Tidsramme: 4 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Tidsramme: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Tidsramme: 5 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Tidsramme: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Tidsramme: 6 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
6 years
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Samarbeidspartnere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Susan E Carlson, PhD, University of Kansas Medical Center
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Generelle publikasjoner
- Colombo J, Shaddy DJ, Gustafson K, Gajewski BJ, Thodosoff JM, Kerling E, Carlson SE. The Kansas University DHA Outcomes Study (KUDOS) clinical trial: long-term behavioral follow-up of the effects of prenatal DHA supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 May 1;109(5):1380-1392. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz018.
- Kerling EH, Hilton JM, Thodosoff JM, Wick J, Colombo J, Carlson SE. Effect of Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Children With Overweight Condition or Obesity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0088.
Hjelpsomme linker
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
1. juli 2008
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
1. mai 2016
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
1. mai 2016
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
18. juni 2012
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
30. juni 2015
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
1. juli 2015
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
7. februar 2018
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
29. januar 2018
Sist bekreftet
1. januar 2018
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 11406
- 1R01HD047315 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Ja
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .